Sources
Help build the largest human-edited directory on the web.
Submit a site - Become an editor
Wikipedia. Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Are you an expert in this subject? Join the discussion and share your knowledge at Wikipedia.org.
Address munging
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Address munging is the practice of disguising, or munging, an e-mail address to prevent it being automatically collected and used as a target for people and organisations who send unsolicited bulk e-mail. Address munging is intended to disguise an e-mail address in a way that prevents computer software seeing the real address, or even any address at all, but still allows a human reader to reconstruct the original and contact the author: an email address such as, "no-one@example.com", becomes "no-one at example dot com", for instance. Any e-mail address posted in public is likely to be automatically collected by computer software used by bulk emailers — a process known as e-mail address harvesting — and addresses posted on webpages, Usenet or chat rooms are particularly vulnerable to this.[1] Private e-mail sent between individuals is highly unlikely to be collected, but e-mail sent to a mailing list that is archived and made available via the web or passed onto a Usenet news server and made public, may eventually be scanned and collected.
Disguising addresses makes it more difficult for people to send e-mail to each other. Many see it as an attempt to fix a symptom rather than solving the real problem of e-mail spam, at the expense of causing problems for innocent users.[2]
The use of address munging on Usenet is contrary to the recommendations of RFC 1036 governing the format of Usenet posts, which requires a valid e-mail address be supplied in the From: field of the post. In practice, few people follow this so strictly.[3]
As an alternative to address munging, there are several "transparent" techniques that allow people to post a valid e-mail address, but still make it difficult for automated recognition and collection of the address:
- "Transparent name mangling" involves replacing characters in the address with equivalent HTML references from the list of XML and HTML character entity references.
- Posting all or part of the e-mail address as an image
- Posting an e-mail address as a text logo and shrinking it to normal size using inline CSS.[4]
- Posting an e-mail address with the order of characters jumbled and restoring the order using CSS.[5]
- Building the link by client-side scripting.[6]
An example of munging "user@example.com" via client-side scripting would be:
The use of images and scripts for address obfuscation can cause problems for people using screenreaders and users with disabilities.
According to a 2003 study by the Center for Democracy and Technology, even the simplest "transparent name mangling" of e-mail addresses can be effective.[7]
Common methods of disguising addresses include:
| Disguised address | Recovering the original address |
|---|---|
| no-one at example (dot) com | Replace " at " with "@", and " (dot) " with "." |
| no-one@elpmaxe.com.invalid | Reverse domain name: elpmaxe to example remove .invalid |
| moc.elpmaxe@eno-on | Reverse the entire address |
| no-one@exampleREMOVEME.com.invalid | Instructions in the address itself; remove .invalid |
| no-one@exampleNOSPAM.com.invalid | Remove NOSPAM from the address, remove .invalid. |
| n o - o n e @ e x a m p l e . c o m | This is still readable, but the spaces between letters stop automatic spambots. |
It's a good idea to include instructions afterwards since many people are unaware of the practice of address munging.
These may not always work, as some spambots are known to remove "NOSPAM" from e-mail addresses, and such.
The reserved top level domain .invalid is appended to ensure that a real e-mail address is not inadvertently generated. One problem is that some spammers will now remove obvious munges and send spam to the cleaned up address. For this reason many people recommend using a totally invalid address (especially in the From line) and perhaps a disposable email address in the Reply To.
- ^ Email Address Harvesting: How Spammers Reap What You Sow, Federal Trade Commission. URL accessed on 24 April 2006.
- ^ Address Munging Considered Harmful, Matt Curtin
- ^ See Usenet.
- ^ Email CSS obfuscation tool (Generator requires javascript enabled, output for displaying emails requires basic CSS)
- ^ PHP jumbler tool
- ^ JavaScript address script generator (Generator requires cookies enabled, output for displaying emails requires javascript enabled)
- ^ "Why Am I Getting All This Spam? Unsolicited Commercial E-mail Research Six Month Report" March 2003.
- Web site Address munging tutorial presented by Project Honey Pot
- Address Munging Frequently Asked Questions
- Newsgroup address munging
|
|
|
|---|---|
| E-mail spam | DNSBL • Spamhaus • Anti-spam techniques • Spambot • Address munging • SORBS E-mail authentication • Directory Harvest Attack • SpamCop • Dictionary spamming |
| Spamdexing | Google bomb • Keyword stuffing • Cloaking • Link farm • Web ring Referer spam • Blog spam • Spam blogs |
| Telemarketing | Autodialer • Mobile phone spam • VoIP spam |
| Scams | Phishing • Advance fee fraud • Lottery scam • Make money fast • Pump and dump |
| Misc. | Messaging spam • Newsgroup spam • Flyposting History of spamming • Network Abuse Clearinghouse |