Animal Liberation Front
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Animal Liberation Front (ALF) is a name used internationally by animal liberation activists who engage in direct action on behalf of animals. This includes removing animals from laboratories or fur farms, and sabotaging facilities involved in animal testing and other animal-based industries. According to ALF statements, any direct action that furthers the cause of animal liberation, where all reasonable precautions are taken not to endanger life, may be claimed as an ALF action.[2]
The ALF is not a group with a membership, but instead is an example of a leaderless resistance, whereby activists who want to engage in action under the auspices of the ALF simply claim their action in the ALF's name. Covert cells, currently active in around 35 countries, operate clandestinely and independently of one other, with activists working on a need-to-know basis. A cell might consist of just one person. Robin Webb, who runs the Animal Liberation Press Office in the UK, has said of this model of activism: "That is why the ALF cannot be smashed, it cannot be effectively infiltrated, it cannot be stopped. You, each and every one of you: you are the ALF."[3]
The activists who speak on behalf of the ALF say that the movement is non-violent. In an interview for Behind the Mask, a 2006 documentary about the ALF, leading activist Rod Coronado said: "One thing that I know that separates us from the people we are constantly accused of being — that is, terrorists, violent criminals — is the fact that we have harmed no one."[4]There has nevertheless been widespread criticism that ALF spokespersons have, at the very least, failed to condemn acts of violence. Groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which monitors U.S. domestric extremism, have noted the involvement of ALF activists in the Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty campaign, which SPLC identifies as using "frankly terroristic tactics similar to those of anti-abortion extremists."[5] In 1998, British terrorism expert Paul Wilkinson said that the ALF and its splinter groups were the "most serious domestic terrorist threat within the United Kingdom,"[6] and in January 2005, the ALF was named as a "terrorist threat" by the United States Department of Homeland Security.[7][8]
Contents |
The ALF is entirely decentralized, with no formal membership or hierarchy, which serves to act as a firebreak when it comes to determining legal responsibility. Founded in the UK in 1976, ALF cells are now active in around 35 countries, including in North and South America, Australia and New Zealand, Russia, South Africa, Turkey, Israel, Iceland, and most European countries. [10]
Activists claim actions on behalf of the ALF anonymously by contacting one of the animal liberation press offices[11] or Bite Back, the direct-action magazine,[12] or by leaving a communication at the location of the action. The press offices are run by Robin Webb in the UK and by surgeon Jerry Vlasak in North America. Webb writes that ALF activists are "people from all walks of life and social background, of all ages, of all beliefs and none."[13]
Although the ALF itself has no formal existence, a sister organization called the Animal Liberation Front Supporters Group[14] exists to support activists who are jailed for actions performed in the name of the ALF. Some leading ALF activists also run an Animal Liberation Front website.[15]
Steven Best, professor of philosophy at the University of Texas at El Paso and a press officer with the Animal Liberation Press Office, describes ALF activism:
ALF activists operate under cover, at night, wearing balaclavas and ski masks, and in small cells of a few people. After careful reconnaisance, skilled liberation teams break into buildings housing animal prisoners in order to release them (e.g. mink and coyotes) or rescue them (e.g. cats, dogs, mice, and guinea pigs). They seize and/or destroy equipment, property, and materials used to exploit animals, and they use arson to raze buildings and laboratories. They have cost the animal exploitation industries hundreds of millions of dollars. They willfully break the law, because the law wrongly consigns animals to cages and confinement, to loneliness and pain, to torture and death.
– Steven Best, Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, p. 11.
The ALF's stated aims are:
- To inflict economic damage on those who profit from the misery and exploitation of animals.
- To liberate animals from places of abuse, i.e. laboratories, factory farms, fur farms etc., and place them in good homes where they may live out their natural lives, free from suffering.
- To reveal the horror and atrocities committed against animals behind locked doors, by performing nonviolent direct actions and liberations
- To take all necessary precautions against harming any animal, human and non-human.
- Any group of people who are vegetarians or vegans and who carry out actions according to ALF guidelines have the right to regard themselves as part of the ALF.[2]
Best writes that "just as nineteenth-century white abolitionists in the US worked across racial lines to create new forms of solidarity, so the new freedom fighters reach across species lines to help our fellow beings in the animal world."[16] He argues that the fight for animal liberation is the "most difficult human battle ever fought," because success will require widespread agreement that human beings ought to give up what many see as their God-given right to use animals.[17]
The ALF's roots can be traced to 19th century England, and a small group of activists called the Bands of Mercy, which was set up in 1824 to thwart fox hunters.[18] In 1965, the group was re-created, this time called the Hunt Saboteurs Association; it laid false scents, blew hunting horns to send the hounds in the wrong direction, set off smoke bombs, and members lay down between the hunters and the fox.
In 1972, activists Ronnie Lee and Cliff Goodman revived the 19th century name and set up the Band of Mercy, a more militant group, which attacked hunters' vehicles by slashing tires and breaking windows. They progressed to attacking pharmaceutical laboratories and seal-hunting boats. On November 10, 1973, they set fire to a building in Milton Keynes, as part of a strategy to make insurance prohibitive for what they saw as exploitative industries, and thus began a campaign of arson that continues to this day.[19]
In August 1974, Lee and Goodman were arrested for allegedly taking part in a raid on Oxford Laboratory Animal Colonies in Bicester, which earned them the name the "Bicester Two." They were sentenced to three years in prison, but released after serving one.
After his release, Goodman allegedly became the first-ever police informer on the animal liberation movement, whereas Lee emerged from prison more militant than before.[19] He organized 30 activists to set up a new liberation campaign, and in 1976, in order to show that the new campaign was prepared to intimidate but was also compassionate, he named it the Animal Liberation Front.[19]
There are conflicting accounts of when the ALF first emerged in the United States. Freeman Wicklund and Kim Stallwood say the first ALF action there was on May 29, 1977, when researchers Ken LeVasseur and Steve Sipman released two dolphins, Puka and Kea, into the ocean at Yokohama Bay, Oahu, Hawaii, from captivity in the University of Hawaii's Marine Mammal Laboratory.[20][21][22]
The North American Animal Liberation Press Office attributes the dolphin release to a group called Undersea Railroad,[23] and says the first ALF action was in fact a raid on the New York University Medical Center on March 14, 1979,[23] when activists removed one cat, two dogs, and two guinea pigs. Ingrid Newkirk, the president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, says that the first ALF cell in the U.S. was set up in late 1982, with the first raid taking place on December 24 that year on Howard University, when 24 cats were removed, some of whose back legs had been crippled in an experiment.[24][20]
Two early ALF raids led to the closure of two university laboratories. A raid on May 28, 1984 on the University of Pennsylvania's head injury clinic caused $60,000 worth of damage and saw the removal of 60 hours of research tapes.[25]The tapes showed researchers laughing and joking as they used a hydraulic device to cause brain damage to baboons.[26] The tapes were turned over to PETA, who edited the content and added voiceover commentary to produce a 26-minute video called Unnecessary Fuss. The ensuing publicity led to the closure of the head injury clinic.[27]
On April 20, 1985, the ALF raided a University of California, Riverside laboratory and hundreds of animals, including Britches, a five-week old macaque monkey who had been separated from his mother and left alone in a wire cage with his eyes sewn shut as part of a study into blindness. As a result of the raid, which was recorded by the ALF (video), eight of the 17 research projects active at the laboratory at the time of the raid were shut down.[25]
Robin Webb has written that, during the 1970s and early 1980s, the media portrayed animal rights activists in a positive light, as animal lovers who were merely eccentric and taking things a little too far: the "Robin Hoods of the animal welfare world."[28] Ronnie Lee, the ALF's founder, wrote in Peace News in 1974 that direct action should be "limited only by reverence for life and hatred of violence,"[29] and in 1979 that the ALF "is not violent in that much care is taken to prevent injury to people and many raids have been called off because of possible confrontation."[29] Lee later said that he regrets the decision to create the ALF as non-violent, and that he now believes "there would have been a place for limited violence against animal abusers."[30]
By the mid-80s, activists realized that economic sabotage was more effective than demonstrations and handing out leaflets. Activists moved on to smashing butchers' shop windows and setting fire to department stores that sold fur coats.
In 1985, the Animal Rights Militia emerged, claiming responsibility for sending letter bombs to those involved in animal testing, and setting fire to stores on the Isle of Wight in 1994, causing £3 million worth of damages. Barry Horne, who was a close friend of Webb's, was subsequently jailed for 18 years for the attacks, later dying in jail during a hunger strike; Webb himself was almost charged with conspiracy in connection with the attacks. [31]
In response to the emergence of this more violent strain of protest in the UK, the British police set up the Animal Rights National Index (ARNI) in or around 1985, which was intended to act as a liaison between the police and MI5, the internal security service, which had started to monitor activists.
Violence against property began to increase substantially after several high-profile campaigns managed to close down a number of facilities perceived to be abusive to animals — Consort Kennels, a facility breeding beagles for animal testing; Hillgrove Farm, which bred cats, and Newchurch Farm, which bred guinea pigs, were all closed after being targeted by animal rights campaigns that appeared to involve the ALF. In the UK, the financial year 1991-1992 saw around 100 refrigerated meat trucks destroyed by incendiary devices at a cost of around $10 million. Butchers' locks were superglued, shrink-wrapped meats were pierced in supermarkets, slaughterhouses and refrigerated meat trucks were set on fire.[31]
| “ | If you support or raise funds for any company connected with Huntingdon Life Sciences we will track you down, come for you and destroy your property with fire. — Statement by the ALF in support of Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty[32] | ” |
There is elsewhere clear evidence that the ALF's attitude toward violence is hardening. In 1999, ALF activists became involved in Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC), an international campaign that aims to close Huntingdon Life Sciences, Europe's largest animal-testing laboratory. The Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors U.S. domestic extremism, has described SHAC's modus operandi as "frankly terroristic tactics similar to those of anti-abortion extremists."[5] The ALF has made no secret of its commitment to SHAC. In May 2005, it issued a warning that threatened violence on behalf of the campaign: "A new era has dawned for those who fund the abusers and raise funds for them to murder animals with ... If you support or raise funds for any company connected with Huntingdon Life Sciences we will track you down, come for you and destroy your property with fire."[32]
ALF activist Donald Currie was jailed for 12 years and placed on probation for life in December 2006 after being found guilty of planting homemade bombs on the doorsteps of a GlaxoSmithKline executive and the director of PDP Couriers, both of which have links to Huntingdon Life Sciences.[33] When ALF activist David Blenkinsop and two others assaulted Huntingdon Life Sciences director Brian Cass with pick-axe handles in February 2001 — an attack so serious that Detective Chief Inspector Tom Hobbs of Cambridgeshire police remarked: "It's only by sheer luck that we are not beginning a murder inquiry"[34] — Ronnie Lee said: "He has got off lightly. I have no sympathy for him."[35]
In June 2006, the ALF claimed responsibility for a firebomb attack on UCLA researcher Lynn Fairbanks. The Animal Liberation Press Office issued a statement saying that Fairbanks was conducting "painful addiction experiments" on monkeys, although Fairbanks herself said she studies primate behavior and does not do invasive research.[citation needed] A firebomb was placed on the doorstep of a house occupied by Fairbanks' 70 year-old neighbor and a tenant; according to the FBI, the device was lit, and was powerful enough to have killed the occupants, but it failed to ignite. The attack was credited by the acting chancellor of UCLA as helping to shape the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, a bill before the U.S. Congress to law enforcement officials more power when dealing with animal rights activism.[36] ALF spokesman Jerry Vlasak said of the attack on Fairbanks: "force is a poor second choice, but if that's the only thing that will work ... there's certainly moral justification for that."[37]
In Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, a collection of essays by animal rights activists, Robin Webb quotes Gandhi, saying: "Where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence." Webb argues that: "[W]hile politicians talked and negotiated, Nazi Germany invaded neighboring countries and began building the concentration camps. It took the overwhelming violence of World War II ... to rid the world of that evil. Such an example suggests that short-term violence may be justifiable in pursuit of a longer-term peace."[38]
Dr. Steven Best, a professor of philosophy at the University of Texas at El Paso and a press officer for the Animal Liberation Press Office, recently coined the term "extensional self-defense" to describe actions carried out in defense of animals by human beings acting as "proxy agents."[39] He argues that, in carrying out acts of extensional self-defense, activists may have the moral right to engage in acts of sabotage or even violence.[39] Extensional self-defense is justified, he writes, because animals are "so vulnerable and oppressed they cannot fight back to attack or kill their oppressors."[40] Best argues that the principle of extensional self defense mirrors the penal code statues known as the "necessity defense," which can be invoked when a defendant believes that the illegal act was necessary to avoid immanent and great harm.[40] In testimony to the Senate in 2005, Dr. Jerry Vlasak stated that he regarded violence against Huntingdon Life Sciences as extensional self-defense on behalf of non-human animals.[41]
Activists who have engaged in direct action that could endanger life have acted using the names Animal Rights Militia (ARM) and the Justice Department, which first appeared in the UK in 1985 and 1993 respectively. Actions claimed under either of these names tend to be more violent or extreme than standard ALF direct action. Whether there is any meaningful distinction between the ALF, ARM, and the Justice Department, in terms of the groups of people involved, is not known.
The Justice Department manifesto, posted on the ALF website, says: "The Animal Liberation Front achieved what other methods have not while adhering to nonviolence. A separate idea was established that decided animal abusers had been warned long enough. ... [T]he time has come for abusers to have but a taste of the fear and anguish their victims suffer on a daily basis."[citation needed]
Robin Webb has said: "[If] someone wishes to act as the Animal Rights Militia or the Justice Department ... the third policy of the ALF [opposition to violence] no longer applies."[42] He has said elsewhere that the "only difference between ALF and the more radical ones is that ALF basically takes every precaution not to endanger life at any time. The Animal Rights Militia are prepared to twist the arm of animal abusers".[citation needed]
Professor Paul Wilkinson, former director of the University of St Andrews Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence, has written that the ALF, the Justice Department and the Animal Rights Militia are essentially the same. In a report on terrorism discussed in the House of Commons, Wilkinson argues that "a cluster of small groups such as the so-called Justice Department of the Animal Liberation Front, and the Animal Rights Militia, have crossed the threshold from extra-parliamentary protest and demonstrations to what can only be described as acts of terrorism; incendiary attacks on shops and other premises and letter and parcel bombs." [43]
Wilkinson cites as examples two attacks on scientists in 1990 — one in Bristol, which led to no injuries, and one in Porton Down, in which a researcher's 13-month-old child was hurt by shrapnel — as well as firebomb attacks in 1994 against shops in Newport, Isle of Wight, York, and Harrogate, one of which ALF activist Barry Horne was convicted in connection with. [43]
The Justice Department claimed responsibility in 1998 for sending letters containing razor blades to hunting guides and people working in the fur industry. David Barbarash, a former Animal Liberation Office press officer based in Canada, was charged with 22 offences in connection with the letters, though the charges were stayed.
The ALF was named as a terrorist threat by the United States Department of Homeland Security in January 2005.[7] In hearings held on May 18, 2005 before a Senate panel, officials of the FBI and ATF stated that "violent animal rights extremists and eco-terrorists now pose one of the most serious terrorism threats to the nation," adding that "of particular concern are the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF)."[45]
The Southern Poverty Law Center has criticized the Department of Homeland Security for concentrating on the Animal and Earth Liberation Fronts rather than on white supremacists, writing that "for all the property damage they have wreaked, eco-radicals have killed no one — something that cannot be said of the white supremacists and others who people the American radical right."[46] Senator James Jeffords said that the "ELF and ALF may threaten dozens of people each year, but an incident at a chemical, nuclear or wastewater facility would threaten tens of thousands."[45]
In 1998, Professor Paul Wilkinson said that the ALF and its splinter groups were the "most serious domestic terrorist threat within the United Kingdom."[44] He told Channel 4's Dispatches that the ALF is "very close" to killing someone, adding: "Keith Mann, who was sentenced to 11 years for his extremist violence, said in a message to ALF activists that sooner or later someone would die. He didn’t express any remorse about this or any regret. Now that does show to me a level of fanaticism which is very dangerous indeed."[44] The The Daily Telegraph has called the ALF "the most active terrorist organisation in Britain."[47]
On January 20, 2006, as part of Operation Backfire, the U.S. Department of Justice announced charges against nine American and two Canadian activists calling themselves the "Family," who are alleged to have engaged in direct action in the name of the Animal Liberation Front and Earth Liberation Front. The Justice Department called the acts examples of "domestic terrorism." Activists and some media sources criticized the investigations, calling them a "witch hunt"[48] and "the Green Scare"[49] — an allusion to the anti-Communist Red Scares of the 20th century.
The incidents included arson attacks against meat-processing plants, lumber companies, a high-tension power line, and a ski center, in Oregon, Wyoming, Washington, California, and Colorado between 1996 and 2001.[50]
In 2006, after three years of filming, animal-rights lawyer Shannon Keith[51] released a documentary about the ALF entitled "Behind the Mask: The Story Of The People Who Risk Everything To Save Animals". The documentary was produced in response to what the ALF sees as a growing bias within the mainstream media against the animal rights movement, both above and underground.
- ^ Lampert, Nicola. "Heather moves in on Stella's ad", The Daily Mail, October 23, 2003.
- ^ a b Best, Steven & Nocella, Anthony J. (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters?, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 8.
- ^ "Staying on Target and Going the Distance: An Interview with U.K. A.L.F. Press Officer Robin Webb", No Compromise, Issue 22, undated
- ^ Behind the Mask: The Story Of The People Who Risk Everything To Save Animals, a film by Shannon Keith, 2006.
- ^ a b "From Push to Shove", Southern Poverty Law Center Intelligence Report, Fall 2002.
- ^ "Inside the ALF", Dispatches with David Monagh, Channel 4 television, 1998. It is unclear whether Professor Wilkinson is referring to the ALF or to the Justice Department and the Animal Rights Militia, names used by splinter groups with an unclear relationship to the ALF. In a report on terrorism discussed in the House of Commons, Wilkinson implies that the ALF, the Justice Department and the Animal Rights Militia are essentially the same. He writes: "The majority of those involved in the animal welfare lobby keep firmly within the law and abhor violence. However, a cluster of small groups such as the so-called Justice Department of the Animal Liberation Front, and the Animal Rights Militia, have crossed the threshold from extra-parliamentary protest and demonstrations to what can only be described as acts of terrorism; incendiary attacks on shops and other premises and letter and parcel bombs. In 1990 animal rights extremists used car bombs in two attacks on scientists, one in Bristol and one in Porton Down. In the former case the scientist was unhurt, but a 13 month old baby was injured by shrapnel. There were major firebomb attacks against shops in Newport, Isle of Wight, York and Harrogate, in 1994. Millions of pounds worth of damage has been caused over the past few years alone" (Hansard, December 14, 1992, column 223).
- ^ a b Rood, Justin. "Animal Rights Groups and Ecology Militants Make DHS Terrorist List, Right-Wing Vigilantes Omitted", Congressional Quarterly, March 25, 2005.
- ^ Tolson, Giselle. "The ALF: America’s Favorite 'Terrorists'", The Bard Observer, Issue 15, 2006, retrieved August 17, 2006.
- ^ Best, Steven in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 11.
- ^ ALF cells are known to be active in Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Belarus, Canada, Canary Islands, Chile, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Holland, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States. See "Diary of Actions", Bite Back, March 23, 2007.
- ^ Animal Liberation Press Office
- ^ "Bite Back"
- ^ Webb, Robin. "Animal Liberation — By "Whatever Means Necessary," in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 75.
- ^ Animal Liberation Supporters Group website
- ^ Animal Liberation Front website
- ^ Best, Steven in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 12.
- ^ Best, Steven in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 13.
- ^ Best, Steven in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 19.
- ^ a b c Best, Steven in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 20.
- ^ a b Best, Steven in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 21.
- ^ Vorsino, Mary. Biography of Ken LeVasseur", Whales on the Net.
- ^ "Last dolphin dies at marine laboratory", Honolulu Star-Bulletin, February 26, 20404.
- ^ a b "History of the Animal Liberation Movement", North American Animal Liberation Press Office.
- ^ Newkirk 2000.
- ^ a b Best, Steven in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 22.
- ^ The video footage released by PETA can be viewed at Unnecessary Fuss 1 Unnecessary Fuss 2 Unnecessary Fuss 3 Unnecessary Fuss 4 Unnecessary Fuss 5 (videos).
- ^ On the basis of Unnecessary Fuss, PETA petitioned the Office for Protection from Research Risks (OPRR) to have the University of Pennsylvania's head injury lab closed down. The OPRR initially refused to act on the basis of edited material and after more than a year of refusing to turn over the original tapes, PETA eventually did so. The edited tape was found to have "grossly overstated the deficiencies in the Head Injury Clinic", but OPRR also found serious violations of accepted procedure. As a result, the head injury clinic was closed, the university's chief veterinarian was fired, the university was put on probation, the administration of the program was reorganized, and new training programs for staff were instituted. (McCarthy, Charles R. Reflections on the Organizational Locus of the Office for Protection from Research Risks Online Ethics Centre for Engineering and Science, Charles R. McCarthy, October 28, 2004. Retrieved October 2, 2006).
- ^ Webb, Robin. "Animal Liberation — By 'Whatever Means Necessary'," in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 77.
- ^ a b Stallwood, Kim. "A Personal Overview of Direct Action," in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 83.
- ^ Lee, Ronnie. "The Formation of the Band of Mercy and A.L.F.", No Compromise, issue no. 28.
- ^ a b Webb, Robin. "Animal Liberation — By 'Whatever Means Necessary'," in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 78.
- ^ a b Laville, Sandra & Campbell, Duncan. "Animal rights extremists in arson spree", The Guardian, June 25, 2005.
- ^ Addley, Esther. "Animal Liberation Front bomber jailed for 12 years", The Guardian, December 8, 2006.
- ^ Goodwin, Jo-Ann. "The Animals of Hatred", The Daily Mail, October 15, 2003.
- ^ "From Push to Shove", Southern Poverty Law Center, undated, retrieved 2 October 2006.
- ^ Trounson, Rebecca & Mozingo, Joe. "UCLA to Protect Animal Research", LA Times, August 26, 2006.
- ^ "Terror at UCLA", Critical Mass, August 22, 2006.
- ^ Webb, Robin. "Animal Liberation — By 'Whatever Means Necessary'," in Best & Nocella (eds), Terrorists or Freedom Fighters, Lantern Books, 2004, p. 80.
- ^ a b Best, Steven. "Gaps in Logic, Lapses in Politics: Rights and Abolitionism in Joan Dunayer's Speciesism", drstevebest.org.
- ^ a b Best, Steven. "Who's Afraid of Jerry Vlasak?", Animal Liberation Press Office.
- ^ Miller, John J. "In the name of the animals: America faces a new kind of terrorism", National Review, July 3, 2006.
- ^ "Staying on Target and Going the Distance: An Interview with U.K. A.L.F. Press Officer Robin Webb", No Compromise, Issue 22. Retrieved October 2, 2006.
- ^ a b Hansard, December 14, 1992, column 223.
- ^ a b c "Inside the ALF", Dispatches with David Monagh, Channel 4 television, 1998.
- ^ a b FBI, ATF address domestic terrorism CNN.com, Terry Frieden, May 19, 2005.
- ^ "Decade of domestic terror documented by Center", Southern Poverty Law Center, September 2005. Retrieved October 2, 2006.
- ^ Terrorists in our midst The Telegraph, 21 February 2006. Retrieved 2 October 2006
- ^ FBI Witch Hunt, retrieved October 2, 2006.
- ^ FBI Green scare continues more arrests this week Indybay, Arizona Indymedia Center, February 2, 2006. Retrieved October 2, 2006.
- ^ Eleven Defendants Indicted on Domestic Terrorism Charges US Department of Justice, January 20, 2006. Retrieved 2 October 2006
- ^ Shannon Keith's animal-rights legal practice
- Animal Liberation Front website - Global website
- Animal Liberation Front Press Office website - US
- Animal Liberation Front Supporters Group
- Official ALF Forum
- Arkangel, a magazine dedicated to animal liberation
- Bite Back a magazine and diary of Animal Liberation Front actions
- No Compromise "The militant, direct action publication of grassroots animal liberationists and their supporters"
- Animal Liberation Front (ALF) Frequently Asked Questions by the North American ALF Supporters Group.
- Animal Liberation Through Trade Unions?
- ADL Entry for the ALF and EcoTerrorism
- FBI testimony on the ALF, James F. Jarboe before the House Resources Committee, Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health, February 12, 2002.
- Ingrid Newkirk, Free the Animals: The Story of the Animal Liberation Front, Lantern Books, 2000, ISBN 1-930051-22-0
- "Interviews with AR activists and supporters of AR activists", Animal Liberation Front, retrieved October 27, 2005
- SourceWatch article on ALF
- "Terrorism 2000 / 2001" FBI document citing the ALF as special interest terrorists
- FBI material on the Animal Liberation Front