From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Appeal to consequences, also known as argumentum ad consequentiam (Latin: argument to the consequences), is an argument that concludes a premise (typically a belief) to be either true or false based on whether the premise leads to desirable or undesirable consequences. This is based on an appeal to emotion and is a form of logical fallacy, since the appeal of a consequence does not address the truth value of the premise. Moreover, in categorizing consequences as either desirable or undesirable, such arguments inherently contain subjective points of view.

In logic, appeal to consequences refers only to arguments which assert a premise's truth value (true or false) based on the consequences; appeal to consequences does not refer to arguments that address a premise's desirability (good or bad, or right or wrong) instead of its truth value.

Contents 1 General form 1.1 Positive form 1.1.1 Examples 1.2 Negative form 1.2.1 Examples 2 Notes 3 References 4 See also

An argument based on appeal to consequences generally has the following argument form^[1]:

If P, then Q will occur.

Q is desirable/undesirable.

Therefore, P is true/false.

If P, then Q will occur.

Q is desirable.

Therefore, P is true.

It is closely related to wishful thinking in its construction.

• "Pi is probably a rational number: being rational would make it more elegant."
• "Real estate markets will continue to rise this year: home owners enjoy the capital gains."
• "Humans will travel faster than light: faster-than-light travel would be beneficial for space travel."
• "If the six men win, it will mean that the police are guilty of perjury, that they are guilty of violence and threats, that the confessions were invented and improperly admitted in evidence and the convictions were erroneous... This is such an appalling vista that every sensible person in the land would say that it cannot be right that these actions should go any further." Lord Denning in his judgment on the Birmingham Six

If P, then Q will occur.

Q is undesirable.

Therefore, P is false.

Appeal to force is a special instance of this form.

This form somewhat resembles modus tollens but is both different and fallacious, since "Q is undesirable" is not equivalent to "Q is false".

• "The axiom of choice must be wrong because it implies the Banach-Tarski paradox, meaning that geometry contradicts common sense."
• "Wikipedia is seldom wrong: it would not be a reliable source if it contained many errors."
• "Atheism must be erroneous: it denies eternal happiness after death."
• "Religion must be false: if it were true, nobody would have free will."

1. ^ FallacyFiles.org - Appeal to Consequences

• ESGS.org - Appeal to Consequences

• appeal to fear
• wishful thinking
• argumentum ad hominem circumstantial form
• list of logical fallacies
• Pascal's Wager

Fallacies of Irrelevance v • d • e
Absurdity | Argument from ignorance | Argument from silence | Bandwagon fallacy Bulverism | Irrelevant conclusion | Middle ground | Missing argument Proof by assertion | Straw man | Style over substance | Two wrongs make a right
Appeal to consequences:
	Appeal to force | Wishful thinking
Appeal to emotion:
	Fear | Flattery | Nature | Pity | Repugnance | Ridicule | Spite
Genetic fallacy:
	Personal attack (Appeal to motive | Guilt by association | Poisoning the well | You too) Appeal to authority (Novelty | Poverty | Tradition | Wealth) | Chronological snobbery | Etymology
Other types of fallacy