Ault Report

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

The "Ault Report" or more formally Air-to-Air Missile System Capability Review was a sweeping study of US Navy air-to-air missile performance during the period of 1965 to 1968. The was initiated at the behest of Admiral Tom Moorer, the Chief of Naval Operations who had recently taken office (August 1967) and was disturbed at dismal performance of Navy air-to-air missiles in engagements with North Vietnamese MiGs. Admiral Moorer tasked the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIRSYSCOM) to conduct “an in-depth examination of the entire process by which Air-to-Air missile systems are acquired and employed” and further directed that Ault be placed in charge of the effort.


Ault directed a team of five experts who addressed 5 basic questions to be addressed by the study:

1 Is industry delivering to the Navy a high quality product, designed and built to specifications?

2 Are Fleet support organizations delivering a high quality product to the CVA’s (aircraft carriers) and to forward sites ashore?

3 Do shipboard and squadron organizations (afloat and ashore) launch an optimally ready combat aircraft-missile system?

4 Does the combat aircrew fully understand and exploit the capabilities of the aircraft-missile system? (Corollary question: Is the aircraft-missile system properly designed and configured for the air-to-air mission?)

5 Is the air-to-air missile system (aircraft/fire control system/missile) repair and rework program returning a quality product to the Fleet?

Among the many findings of the Ault report was the need for an "Advanced Fighter Weapons School" to revive the community fighter expertise that had been resident in the Fleet Air Gunnery Units (FAGU) that had been disbanded some time before. Ault had already resonanted the idea with the Fleet and suggested that such a school be created under the auspices of Replacement Carrier Air Wing 12 that had organizatinal responsibility for the Replacement Air Groups (RAG) charged with training aircrews in each of the type/model/series aircraft operated off the aircraft carriers. In the case of the F-4 Phantom, Fighter Squadron 121 was the Phantom RAG. Accordingly, two VF-121 RAG instructors were detailed to begin setting up an advanced syllabus for fighter employment. Therefore, LCdr Dan Pederson and Lt Jim Ruliffson became the first two TOPGUN instructors.

One of the critical findings of the Ault Report was that many of the missile failures were due to out of envelope firings due to unfamiliarity of the aircrews with the dynamically changing launch acceptability regions (LAR). Ault proposed to create an instrumented range to help aircrews become familiar with the complexities of firing their air-to-air missiles. This led to development of the Air Combat Maneuvering Range (ACMR) at MCAS Yuma for use by aircraft flying out of NAS Miramar. The Air Force was faced with the same problem and also began development of a similar Air Combat Maneuvering Instrumentation (ACMI) range at Nellis AFB

The Air Force conducted an exhaustive study of air-to-air encounters in Southeast Asia titled "Project Red Baron" and included all service experiences in the scope of effort. The first effort reported out in Dec 1966 as Project Red Baron I (declassified in 2001), Red Baron II reported out in 1973 and Red Baron III in 1974. The impact of Project Red Baron recommendations on the Air Force also resulted in significant improvements in training such as creation of Operation Red Flag at Nellis AFB and establishment of Aggressor Squadrons worldwide to provide Dissimiliar Air Combat Training.

Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.