Brown Corpus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Brown Corpus of Standard American English (or just Brown Corpus) was compiled by Henry Kucera and W. Nelson Francis at Brown University, Providence, RI as a general corpus (text collection) in the field of corpus linguistics.

In 1967, Kucera and Francis published their classic work Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English (1967), which provided basic statistics on what is known today simply as the Brown Corpus. The Brown Corpus was a carefully compiled selection of current American English, totalling about a million words drawn from a wide variety of sources. Kucera and Francis subjected it to a variety of computational analyses, from which they compiled a rich and variegated opus, combining elements of linguistics, psychology, statistics, and sociology. It has been very widely used in computational linguistics, and was for many years among the most-cited resources in the field.

One interesting result is that even for quite large samples, graphing words in order of decreasing frequency of occurrence shows a hyperbola: the frequency of the n-th most frequent word is roughly proportional to 1/n. Thus "the" constitutes nearly 7% of the Brown Corpus, and "of" more than another 3; while about half the total vocabulary of about 50,000 words are hapax legomena: words that occur only once in the corpus. This simple rank vs. frequency relationship was noted for an extraordinary variety of phenomena by George Kingsley Zipf (for example, see his "The Psychobiology of Language"), and is known as Zipf's Law.

Shortly after publication of the first lexicostatistical analysis, Boston publisher Houghton-Mifflin approached Kucera to supply a million word, three-line citation base for its new American Heritage Dictionary. This ground-breaking new dictionary, which first appeared in 1969, was the first dictionary to be compiled using corpus linguistics for word frequency and other information.

The initial Brown Corpus had only the words themselves, plus a location identifier for each. Over the following several years part-of-speech tags were applied. The Greene and Rubin tagging program (see under part of speech tagging) helped considerably in this, but the high error rate meant that extensive manual proofreading was required.

The tagged Brown Corpus used a selection of about 80 parts of speech, as well as special indicators for compound forms, contractions, foreign words and a few other phenomena, and formed the basis for many later corpora such as the Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus. The tagged corpus enabled far more sophisticated statistical analysis, much of it carried out by graduate student Andrew Mackie. Some of the analysis appears in Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar, by Winthrop Nelson Francis and Henry Kucera, Houghton Mifflin (January, 1983) ISBN 0-395-32250-2.

Although the Brown Corpus pioneered the field of corpus linguistics, by now typical corpora (such as the British National Corpus) tend to be much larger, on the order of 100 million words.

The Corpus consists of 500 samples, distributed across 15 genres in rough proportion to the amount published in 1961 in each of those genres. All works sampled were published in 1961; as far as could be determined they were first published then, and were written by native speakers of American English.

Each sample began at a random sentence-boundary in the article or other unit chosen, and continued up to the first sentence boundary after 2,000 words. In a very few cases miscounts led to samples being just under 2,000 words.

The original data entry was done on upper-case only keypunch machines; capitals were indicated by a preceding asterisk, and various special items such as formulae also had special codes.

The corpus originally (1961) contained 1,014,312 words sampled from 15 text categories:

  • A. PRESS: Reportage (44 texts)
    • Political
    • Sports
    • Society
    • Spot News
    • Financial
    • Cultural
  • B. PRESS: Editorial (27 texts)
    • Institutional Daily
    • Personal
    • Letters to the Editor
  • C. PRESS: Reviews (17 texts)
    • theatre
    • books
    • music
    • dance
  • D. RELIGION (17 texts)
    • Books
    • Periodicals
    • Tracts
  • E. SKILL AND HOBBIES (36 texts)
    • Books
    • Periodicals
  • F. POPULAR LORE (48 texts)
    • Books
    • Periodicals
  • G. BELLES-LETTRES - Biography, Memoirs, etc. (75 texts)
    • Books
    • Periodicals
  • H. MISCELLANEOUS: US Government & House Organs (30 texts)
    • Government Documents
    • Foundation Reports
    • Industry Reports
    • College Catalog
    • Industry House organ
  • J. LEARNED (80 texts)
    • Natural Sciences
    • Medicine
    • Mathematics
    • Social and Behavioral Sciences
    • Political Science, Law, Education
    • Humanities
    • Technology and Engineering
  • K. FICTION: General (29 texts)
    • Novels
    • Short Stories
  • L. FICTION: Mystery and Detective Fiction (24 texts)
    • Novels
    • Short Stories
  • M. FICTION: Science (6 texts)
    • Novels
    • Short Stories
  • N. FICTION: Adventure and Western (29 texts)
    • Novels
    • Short Stories
  • P. FICTION: Romance and Love Story (29 texts)
    • Novels
    • Short Stories
  • R. HUMOR (9 texts)
    • Novels
    • Essays, etc.

  • . sentence closer (. ; ? *)
  • ( left paren
  • ) right paren
  • * not, n't
  • -- dash
  • , comma
  •  : colon
  • ABL pre-qualifier (quite, rather)
  • ABN pre-quantifier (half, all)
  • ABX pre-quantifier (both)
  • AP post-determiner (many, several, next )
  • AT article (a, the, no)
  • BE be
  • BED were
  • BEDZ was
  • BEG being
  • BEM am
  • BEN been
  • BER are, art
  • BEZ is
  • CC coordinating conjunction (and, or)
  • CD cardinal numberal (one, two, 2, etc.)
  • CS subordinating conjunction (if, although)
  • DO do
  • DOD did
  • DOZ does
  • DT singular determiner/quantifier (this, that)
  • DTI singular or plural determiner/quantifier (some, any)
  • DTS plural determiner (these, those)
  • DTX determiner/double conjunction (either)
  • EX existential there
  • FW foreign word (hypenated before regular tag)
  • HV have
  • HVD had (past tense)
  • HVG having
  • HVN had (past participle)
  • IN preposition
  • JJ adjective
  • JJR comparative adjective
  • JJS semantically superlative adjective (chief,top)
  • JJT morphologically superlative adjective (biggest)
  • MD modal auxiliary (can, should, will)
  • NC cited word (hyphenated after regular tag)
  • NN singular or mass noun
  • NN$ possessive singular noun
  • NNS plural noun
  • NNS$ possessive plural noun
  • NP proper noun or part of name phrase
  • NP$ possessive proper noun
  • NPS$ possessive plural proper noun
  • NR adverbial noun (home, today, west)
  • OD ordinal numeral (first, 2nd)
  • PN nominal pronoun (everybody, nothing)
  • PN$ possessive nominal pronoun
  • PP$ possessive personal pronoun (my, our)
  • PP$$ second (nominal) possessive prounon (mine, ours)
  • PPL singular reflexive/intensive personal pronoun (myself)
  • PPLS plural reflexive/intensive personal pronoun (ourselves)
  • PPO objective personal pronoun (me, him, it, them)
  • PPS 3rd. singular nominative pronoun (he, she, it, one)
  • PPSS other nominative personal pronoun (I, we, they, you)
  • QL qualifier (very, fairly)
  • QLP post-qualifer (enough, indeed)
  • RB adverb
  • RBR comparative adverb
  • RBT superlative adverb
  • RN nominal adverb (here, then, indoors)
  • RP adverb/particle (about, off, up)
  • TO infinitive marker to
  • UH interjection, exclamation
  • VB verb, base form
  • VBD verb, past tense
  • VBG verb, present participle/gerund
  • VBN verb, past participle
  • VBZ verb, 3rd. singular present
  • WDT wh- determiner (what, which)
  • WP$ possessive wh- pronoun (whose)
  • WPO objective wh- pronoun (whom, which, that)
  • WPS nominative wh- pronoun (who, which, that)
  • WQL wh- qualifier (how)
  • WRB wh- adverb (how, where, when)

Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.