From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For the Wikipedia sister project, see Wikimedia Commons.

In England and Wales, a common (or common land) is a piece of land over which other people—often neighbouring landowners—could exercise one of a number of traditional rights, such as allowing their cattle to graze upon it. The older texts use the word "common" to denote any such right, but more modern usage is to refer to particular rights of common, and to reserve the word "common" for the land over which the rights are exercised. By extension, the term "commons" has come to be applied to other resources which a community has rights or access to.

Contents 1 Commons in England and Wales 2 Wider usage of the term 3 See also 4 External links 5 References

The fact that land is common land does not mean it has no owner—all land in England and Wales is owned by someone. Those who have a right to exercise a right of common are known as commoners. Historically most rights of common were "appurtenant" to particular plots of land. So the commoner would be the person who, for the time being, was the owner of the land. Some rights of common were said to be "in gross" in that they were unconnected with ownership or tenure of land. This was more usual in regions where commons were more extensive, such as in Northern England or in the Fens but also included many village greens across England and Wales.

Example rights of common are:

• common pasture (right to pasture cattle, horses, sheep or other animals on the common land)
• common piscary (the right to fish)
• common turbary (the right to take sods of turf)
• estovers (the right to take sufficient wood for the commoner's house or agriculture)

Rights of common grazing might also be held over privately owned arable strips in some open field manors; this right was exercised either after the harvest or during a fallow year. Rights of grazing in the open fields was most valuable in manors with relatively little other grazing.

It is often thought that a common is somehow owned by everyone, or at least by the community in some sense. While that may have been true more than a thousand years ago, when waste would be used for grazing by the local community and over which there would not be, nor would there need to be, any particular limit or control of usage; since at least late Anglo-Saxon times, the right to exercise a right of common has been restricted to a commoner. Since the right of common would have some natural limitations itself, commons never suffered from the tragedy of the commons.

The legal position concerning common land is confused. Most commons are based on ancient rights which predate the established law and even the Monarchy. The exact rights which apply to individual commons may be documented but more often are based on long held traditions. The UK government tried to regularise the definitions of common land with the Commons Registration Act 1965, which established a register of common land. However numerous inconsistencies and irregularities remain.

Prior to the Erection of Cottages Act 1588, an Englishman could build his house on common land, if he could raise the roof over his head and have a fire at the hearth between sunrise and sunset, and claim the dwelling as his home.

The act of transferring resources from the commons to individual ownership is known as enclosure or inclosure.

The word "Commons" has now come to be used in the sense of any sets of resources that a community recognizes as being accessible to any member of that community. The nature of commons is different in different communities, but they often include cultural resources and natural resources.

While commons are generally seen as a system opposed to private property, they have been combined in the idea of common property, which are resources owned equally by every member of the community, even though the community recognises that only a limited number of members may use the resource at any given time.

Commons are a subset of public goods; specifically meaning a public good which is not infinite. Commons can therefore be land, rivers and, arguably, money. The Commons is most often a finite but replenishable resource, which requires responsible use in order to remain available. A subset of this is a commons which requires not only responsible use but also active contribution from its users, such as a school or church funded by local donations.

In order to ensure responsibility of the users, there must be a system of management. Such models include the Hobbesian Leviathan model, where there is a central authority that monitors the behaviour of the users and can sanction abusers. There are also many other models, some of which can require no maintenance—for instance, if it is known that the collective consists mostly of contingent cooperators, then once responsible behaviour has been established, it will most likely continue without management. Another model is reputation management.

• Boston Common - a commons purchased by the City of Boston, 1630
• Citizen's dividend
• Crown Estate
• Inclosure
• Ithaca Commons
• Property rights (economics)
• Public domain
• Rights of Way
• Tragedy of the commons
• Tragedy of the anticommons
• Village green
• Wong
• Wikimedia Commons

• Cooperation Commons The Cooperation Project, a collaboration between the Institute for the Future and Howard Rheingold, proposes to catalyze an interdisciplinary study of cooperation, commons research and collective action.
• Project Communis weblog on privatisation and common property
• Section Z promotes building common assets.
• The Commons: Open Society Sustainability Initiative Technology, sustainable development and "social justice"
• Common land, town and village greens and the Commons Bill
• Information Commons - Uniting society’s public information into one massively distributed database.
• A French definition
• The Commons Institute - promoting the use of commons (in the wider sense).
• History of Parliament
• Conservation CommonsThe Conservation Commons promotes conscious, effective, and equitable sharing of knowledge resources to advance conservation.

• Frischmann , Brett M., "An Economic Theory of Infrastructure and Commons Management" . Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 89, pp. 917-1030, 2005
• J.M. Neeson, Commoners: Common Right, Enclosure and Social Change in England, 1700 – 1820, [1, Cambridge University Press, 1993, ISBN 0-521-56774-2]
• Martina de Moor, Leigh Shaw-Taylor, and Paul Warde, eds. The Management of Common Land in North West Europe, c. 1500-1850. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 2002.
• Meinzen-Dick, Ruth, Esther Mwangi, and Stephan Dohrn: Securing the Commons. CAPRi Policy Brief 4. Washington DC: IFPRI. May 2006.