From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The continuous and progressive aspects are grammatical aspects that express incomplete action in progress at a specific time: they are non-habitual, imperfective aspects. Most languages treat continuous and progressive aspects as alike and use the two terms interchangeably, but there are languages that distinguish them.

As with other grammatical categories, the precise semantics of the aspects vary from language to language, and from grammarian to grammarian. For example, G.L. Lewis's grammar of Turkish counts the -iyor form as a present tense; Robert Underhill's as a progressive tense; and Jacklin Kornfilt's as both a continuous (nonhabitual imperfective) and a progressive (continuous non-stative) aspect.

The difference between the continuous and progressive aspects is hard to grasp for those whose languages do not distinguish between the two (as is the case in English and most other languages). In general, the progressive aspect expresses the dynamic quality of actions that are in progress while the continuous aspect expresses the state of the subject that is continuing the action. For instance, the English sentence "Tom is walking" can express the active movement of Tom's legs (progressive aspect), or Tom's current state, the fact that Tom is walking rather than doing something else at the moment (continuous aspect). Another example is the difference between "The cat was sitting on the mat" (continuous: the cat's state is "seated") and "The cat was sitting down on the mat" (progressive: at that moment, the cat was in the middle of the action of sitting down).

The relationship between the progressive and continuous aspects is not quite clear. Some linguists consider the progressive aspect to be a kind of continuous aspect, one that merely emphasizes the action already conveyed by the continuous. However, some other linguists consider the continuous aspect to be a kind of progressive aspect, because in many languages that distinguish the two, the formal progressive aspect can convey a semantic continuous aspect, but not the reverse. Additionally, the continuous and progressive aspects (whatever the relationship between them) are both sometimes considered to be kinds of durative aspect.

Unless otherwise indicated, the following languages treat continuous and progressive aspects the same, in which case the term continuous is used to refer to both.

The continuous aspect is expressed with a regularly conjugated form of to be, together with the present participle of the main verb. For example, in the sentence "I was going to the store," the verb phrase was going is in the past continuous tense - that is, in the continuous aspect and the past tense.

The continuous aspect can be applied with any mood, voice, and tense, and in combination or not with the perfect aspect, although for obvious semantic reasons, some combinations are less common than others. Some examples of the continuous aspect include:

• We had been talking for hours. (indicative mood, active voice, past tense, perfect continuous aspect)
• If you're not going to be working on it the whole time, … (indicative mood, active voice, present tense, continuous aspect)
• … then I recommend you at least be working on it when the teacher gets back. (present subjunctive mood, active voice, continuous aspect)
• I wish I were being given more interesting tasks. (past subjunctive mood, passive voice, continuous aspect)

The continuous is generally used for actions that are actively on-going at the time in question, and does not focus on the larger time-scale. For example, the sentence "John was playing tennis when Jane called him" indicates what John was doing when Jane called him, but does not indicate for how long John played, nor how often he plays; for that, the simple past would suffice: "John played tennis three hours every day for several years."

The perfect continuous (have been doing), as a special case, implies that the action being described was interrupted at the time in question, and does not clarify whether the action resumed. For example, "John had been playing tennis when Jane called him" suggests that Jane's calling him interrupted his tennis-playing (whereas in the former example, it was possible that he simply ignored her call), and leaves open the possibility that what she told him required such urgent action that he forfeited his match and left.

In the present tense, the continuous aspect can be used to describe actions that have not begun yet; and in any tense, a similar effect can be achieved with the auxiliary "go" in its continuous aspect. An example of the former is "I'm taking three classes next semester"; of the latter, "I was going to do it if I had time, and then I didn't have time." In this use, this construction has a temporal (tense-like) quality in additional to its usual aspectual one.

One hypothesis regarding the origin of the development of the English progressive aspect was the Old English construction that used a form of beon/wesan (to be/to become) with a present participle (-ende). Although there is some debate among scholars, it is generally thought that such a construction in Old English was not analogous to progressive aspect signaled in present-day-English (a more modern development), but rather carried the meaning of a simple stative verb, where the past participle functioned as an adjective, and was predominantly used for translating the corresponding construction in Latin texts (Brinton, 1988, p. 109).

One postulated source of the English's current progressive aspect is the Celtic languages that were spoken in Britain during much of Britain's history, all of which formed it similarly;^[1] This may explain why English is the only Germanic language with this feature.^{[citation needed]}

Chinese is one family of languages that makes a distinction between the continuous and progressive aspects.

Cantonese has a very regular system for expressing aspects via verb suffixes. 緊 is typically used to express progressive aspect while 住 is used to express continuous aspect. Take the following example:

In the example, the progressive aspect expresses the fact that the subject is actively putting on clothes rather than merely wearing them as in the continuous aspect. This example is useful for showing English speakers the difference between continuous and progressive because "wearing" in English never conveys the progressive aspect (instead "putting on" must be used).

In Cantonese, the progressive marker 緊 can express the continuous aspect as well, depending on the context (so the example above could also mean "I'm wearing clothes" in addition to "I'm putting on clothes"), but in general, the progressive aspect is assumed. In order to emphasize the progressive aspect rather than the continuous, 喺度 (literally meaning "at here") can be used in front of the verb:

我(I) 喺度(at here) 著(wear) 緊(PROG) 衫(clothes) 。(.)

喺度 can also be used without 緊 to indicate the progressive aspect.

Unlike Cantonese, Mandarin does not have a verb suffix for expressing the progressive aspect, but it can use 正在 (or simply just 在), which also translates to "at [here]", similar to how Cantonese uses 喺度 in front of the verb.

The continuous aspect does have a verb suffix, 著, which is cognate with the Cantonese 住 in this context. Incidentally, 著 is also used for the Cantonese word for "wear", but is actually not related since it's one of those words that has multiple meanings in Chinese.

French does not have a continuous aspect per se; events that English would describe using its continuous aspect, French would describe using a neutral aspect. That being said, French can express a continuous sense using the periphrastic construction être en train de ("to be in the middle of"); for example, English's "we were eating" might be expressed in French either as nous étions en train de manger, or as simply nous mangions.

Quebec French often expresses a continuous sense using the periphrastic construction être après (lit. "to be after"); for example, English's "we were eating" might be expressed in Quebec French either as nous étions après manger, or as simply nous mangions.

Italian forms a continuous aspect in much the same way as in English, using a present tense conjugation of the verb stare ("to be") followed by the present participle of the main verb. Depending upon the ending of the main verb in the infinitive, the present participle will replace the infinitive suffix with -ando (if the verb's infinitive ends in -are) or -endo (if the infinitive ends in -ere or -ire). For example: Sto leggendo ("I am reading").

Depending upon the region of Italy, continuous aspects in the present tense (the present progressive) may or may not be commonly used, but in nearly all regions its use is practically interchangeable with the standard present tense. For example, Sto pattinando and Io pattino ("I am skating" and "I skate") carry virtually identical connotations in standard Italian. In addition, the Italian language does not differentiate, as English does, between progressive and perfect progressive. While in English, one may say "We are reading" and "We have been reading" to two different effects, there is no expression specifically for the latter in Italian.

Conjugations of the Present Progressive:

person	avere	essere	parlare	credere	finire	dire	opporre
io	sto avendo	sto essendo	sto parlando	sto credendo	sto finendo	sto dicendo	sto opponendo
tu	stai avendo	stai essendo	stai parlando	stai credendo	stai finendo	stai dicendo	stai opponendo
lui/lei	sta avendo	sta essendo	sta parlando	sta credendo	sta finendo	sta dicendo	sta opponendo
noi	stiamo avendo	stiamo essendo	stiamo parlando	stiamo credendo	stiamo finendo	stiamo dicendo	stiamo opponendo
voi	state avendo	state essendo	state parlando	state credendo	state finendo	state dicendo	state opponendo
loro	stanno avendo	stanno essendo	stanno parlando	stanno credendo	stanno finendo	stanno dicendo	stanno opponendo

As the table shows, the present progressive tense is one of the least irregular tenses in the Italian language, with a very predictable conjugation pattern even for verbs that are typically irregular, such as essere ("to be") and avere ("to have"). The suffix of the main verb will always be either -ando or -endo depending upon the suffix of the verb's infinitive, and stare (another way of saying "to be"), the active verb, is irregular only in its third person plural (loro) form.

Much like the present progressive and present tenses are considered interchangeable in standard Italian conversational patterns, the past progresive is considered interchangeable with the imperfect tense. The past participle will be identical to the present participle, such as avendo, but the conjugation of stare changes to its normal conjugation for the imperfect tense. For example, Sto andando ("I am going") would change to Stavo andando ("I was going") in the past progressive. In conventional Italian speaking, Stavo andando, the past progressive, is mostly interchangeable with Andavo ("I used to go" or "I went"), the imperfect.

Conjugations of the Past Progressive:

person	avere	essere	parlare	credere	finire	dire	opporre
io	stavo avendo	stavo essendo	stavo parlando	stavo credendo	stavo finendo	stavo dicendo	stavo opponendo
tu	stavi avendo	stavi essendo	stavi parlando	stavi credendo	stavi finendo	stavi dicendo	stavi opponendo
lui/lei	stava avendo	stava essendo	stava parlando	stava credendo	stava finendo	stava dicendo	stava opponendo
noi	stavamo avendo	stavamo essendo	stavamo parlando	stavamo credendo	stavamo finendo	stavamo dicendo	stavamo opponendo
voi	stavate avendo	stavate essendo	stavate parlando	stavate credendo	stavate finendo	stavate dicendo	stavate opponendo
loro	stavano avendo	stavano essendo	stavano parlando	stavano credendo	stavano finendo	stavano dicendo	stavano opponendo

Like the present progressive, the Italian past progressive is extremely regular. There are no irregular past participles, and stare follows the regular conjugation pattern for -are verbs in the imperfect tense.

There is no continuous aspect in standard German; however, certain regional dialects, such as those of the Rhineland, the Ruhr Area, and Westphalia, form a continuous aspect using the verb sein (to be), the preposition am (short for an dem) (at the or on the), and a gerund. For example, ich bin am Lesen, ich bin beim Lesen (literally I am on/at the reading) means I am reading. Known as the rheinische Verlaufsform (roughly Rhenish progressive form), it has become increasingly common in the casual speech of many speakers of standard German, although it is still frowned upon in formal and literary contexts.

There are various methods of forming a continuous in Dutch.

• One is the same as in English: zijn (to be) with the present participle, e.g. Het schip is zinkende (The ship is sinking). This is usually used to give some dramatic overtone and is not normally used.
• The second method of forming is as in the German dialects above: zijn, the preposition aan, and the gerund (verb used as a noun), e.g. De man is aan het eten (literally The man is at the eating), meaning The man is eating. Mainly (and extensively) used in colloquial speech, but not in official writing.
• The third method is by using a verb expressing position, like zitten (to sit), staan (to stand), liggen (to lie). Examples: Hij zit te lezen (litt. He sits to read), meaning He is reading, Zij ligt te slapen (litt. She lies to sleep), meaning She is sleeping. Using a strange position is found comedic: Hij loopt te koken (litt. He walks to cook). Mainly (and extensively) used in colloquial speech, but not in official writing.
• A fourth method, also available in English, is using the adverb bezig (busy), e.g. Ik ben bezig met lezen (litt. I am busy with reading), meaning I am busy reading.

Formed exactly as in Rhenish German, Jèrriais constructs the continuous with verb êt' (be) + à (preposition) + infinitive. For example, j'têmes à mangi translates as we were eating.

In the Russian language the continuous aspect may be expressed using reduplication.^{[citation needed]}

In Spanish, the continuous is constructed much as in English, using a conjugated form of estar (to be) plus the gerundio (gerund/gerundive/adverbial participle) of the main verb; for example, estar haciendo means to be doing (haciendo being the gerundio of hacer, to do). Unlike in English, the continuous cannot be used to describe an action that has not yet begun at the time of interest; however, in the present tense, the simple present suffices for this, and in any tense, a similar effect can be achieved with the auxiliary ir a ("to go to") in its non-continuous aspect.

Like English, Spanish also has a few related constructions with similar structures and related meanings; for example, seguir haciendo means to keep doing (seguir being to continue).

Hindi and Urdu has a definite progressive/continuous aspect, marked by auxiliaries, for past, present, and future. It is distinguished from the simple aspect, and is widely used in everyday speech. Like English, it is also used to denote an immediate future action. For a complete conjugation of the continuous tenses, see Hindi grammar.

Quechua uses a specific suffix: -chka or sha; which is directly attached before the conjugation suffixes. Although the continuous aspect in Quechua is similar to that of English, it is more used than the simple tenses and is commonly translated into them (simple present and past), because of the idea that actions are not instantaneous, but they have a specific duration (mikuni [I eat] and mikuchkani [I am eating] are both correct, but it is preferred to use mikuchkani because we don't eat in a second).

Japanese uses the same grammar form to form the progressive and the continuous aspect, specifically by using the -teiru form of a verb. Depending on the transitivity of the verb, they are interpreted as either progressive or continuous. For example:

鞄にペンが入っている。

kaban ni pen ga haitteiru.

The pen is in the bag (continuous).

彼は鞄にペンを入れている。

kare wa kaban ni pen wo ireteiru.

He is putting the pen in the bag (progressive).

• Matthews, Stephen and Yip, Virginia (1994). Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-08945-X. 
• Yip, Po-Ching and Rimmington, Don (2004). Chinese: A Comprehensive Grammar. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-15032-9. 

• Frequentative
• Grammatical aspect
• Imperfective aspect
• Grammar of the Breton language

• What is continuous aspect?
• What is progressive aspect?
• The Present Progressives in the European Parliament Proceedings