From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Physical Cosmology

Physical Cosmology

Universe · Big Bang Age of the universe Timeline of the Big Bang... Ultimate fate of the Universe

Early universe

Inflation · Nucleosynthesis Cosmic microwave background

Expanding universe

Redshift · Hubble's law Metric expansion of space Friedmann equations · FLRW metric

Structure formation

Shape of the universe Structure formation Galaxy formation Large-scale structure

Components

Lambda-CDM model Dark energy · Dark matter

History

Timeline of cosmology...

Cosmology experiments

Observational cosmology 2dF · SDSS CoBE · BOOMERanG · WMAP

Scientists

Einstein · Lemaître · Friedman Hubble · Penzias · Wilson Gamow · Dicke · Zel'dovich Mather · Smoot · others

This box: view • talk • edit

Cosmic variance is the idea that we are only able to observe one universe at one particular time, so it is difficult to make statistical statements about cosmology on the scale of the entire universe.

The standard big bang model is usually supplemented with cosmic inflation. In inflationary models, we only see a tiny fraction of the whole universe, much less than a billionth (1/10⁹) of the volume of the universe postulated in inflation. So the observable universe (the so-called particle horizon of the universe) is the result of processes that follow some general physical laws, including quantum mechanics and general relativity. Some of these processes are random: for example, the distribution of galaxies throughout the universe can only be described statistically and cannot be derived from first principles.

This raises philosophical problems: suppose that random physical processes happen on length scales both smaller than and bigger than the horizon. A physical process (such as an amplitude of a primordial perturbation in density) that happens on the horizon scale only gives us one observable realization. A physical process on a larger scale gives us zero observable realizations. A physical process on a slightly smaller scale gives us a small number of realizations.

In the case of only one realization it is difficult to draw statistical conclusions about its significance. For example, if the underlying model of a physical process implies that the observed property should occur only 1% of the time, does that really mean that the model is excluded? Consider the physical model of the citizenship of human beings in the early 21st century, where about 30% are Indian and Chinese citizens, about 5% are American citizens, about 1% are French citizens, and so on. For an observer who has only one observation - of his/her own citizenship- and who happens to be French and cannot make any external observations, the model can be rejected at the 99% significance level. Yet we, the external observers with more information unavailable to the first observer, know that the model is correct.

In other words, even if the bit of the universe we observe is the result of a statistical process, we can only observe one realization of that process, so our observation is statistically insignificant for saying much about the model, unless we are careful to include the variance. This variance is called the cosmic variance and is separate from other sources of experimental error: a very accurate measurement of only one value drawn from a distribution still leaves considerable uncertainty about the underlying model. Variance is normally plotted separately from other sources of uncertainty. Because it is necessarily a large fraction of the signal, workers must be very careful in interpreting the statistical significance of measurements on scales close to the horizon.

In physical cosmology, the common way of dealing with this on the horizon scale and on slightly sub-horizon scales (where the number of occurrences is greater than one but still quite small), is to explicitly include the variance of very small statistical samples (Poisson distribution) when calculating uncertainties. This is important in describing the low multipoles of the cosmic microwave background and has been the source of much controversy in the cosmology community since the COBE and WMAP measurements.

A similar problem is faced by evolutionary biologists. Just as cosmologists have a sample size of one universe, biologists have a sample size of one fossil record. The problem is closely related to the anthropic principle.

• Stephen Hawking (2003). Cosmology from the Top Down. Proceedings of the Davis Meeting on Cosmic Inflation. (online)

Cosmic variance is also the name of a collaborative weblog discussing astrophysics and fundamental physics, written by JoAnne Hewett, Mark Trodden, Sean Carroll, Risa Wechsler, Julianne Dalcanton, John Conway, and Daniel Holz. [1]