de Havilland Canada Dash 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from CC-132 Dash 7)
Jump to: navigation, search
"Dash 7"
Dash 7 in Voyageur Airways colours at the Winnipeg International Airport, 2005.
Type Regional STOL airliner
Manufacturer de Havilland Canada
Maiden flight 27 March 1975
Introduced 3 February 1978
Status Active service
Primary users Various airlines
Canadian Forces
United States Army
Venezuelan Navy
Produced 1975-1988
Number built 113
Developed from DHC-6 Twin Otter
Variants de Havilland Canada Dash 8

The de Havilland Canada DHC-7, popularly known as the Dash 7, is a turboprop-powered regional airliner with STOL capabilities. It first flew in 1975 and remained in production until 1988 when the parent company, de Havilland Canada, was purchased by Boeing.

Contents

In the 1960s, de Havilland Canada was already well known worldwide for their series of high-performance STOL aircraft, notably the very popular Twin Otter. However, these aircraft were generally fairly small and served outlying routes, as opposed to the main feederliner routes which were already well served by larger, higher-performance aircraft such as the Handley Page Jetstream and Fokker F27.

The de Havilland Canada company felt they could compete with these designs in a roundabout way. With their excellent STOL performance, their designs could fly into smaller airports more centrally located in city centers, with runways that the other aircraft could not easily use. The original specification called for a 40-passenger aircraft with a fairly short range of 200 statute miles, operating from runways only 2,000 ft long.

With new noise restrictions coming into effect throughout the 1970s, an aircraft tailored for this role would also have to be very quiet. To meet this restriction, the new design used oversized propellers geared to spin at a slower speed than normal; much of the sound from a propeller is generated at the tips which are spinning near the speed of sound, and therefore, by reducing the number of RPM, this noise is reduced substantially. The Dash 7 often landed with only 900 RPM, and took off at only 1,200.

In other respects, the new DHC-7 was essentially a larger, four-engine version of the Twin Otter. The general layout remained similar, with a large T-tail intended to keep the elevator clear of the propwash during takeoff, a high aspect ratio high-mounted wing, and most details of the cockpit and nose profile. Changes included the addition of cabin pressurization which required a switch to a fuselage with a circular cross-section and landing gear that folded forward into the inner engine nacelles.

Most of the rear wing was spanned by a complex double Fowler flap arrangement for high low-speed lift. The Twin Otter also included "flapperons" that drooped the ailerons as part of the flaps, but these were removed due to safety concerns. Instead the ailerons were reduced in size to allow more flap area, and were so small that they had to be aided by spoilers. On touchdown, hydraulic pressure was automatically reduced in the flaps, allowing them to "blow back" to the 25% position and thus "drop" the aircraft to the runway for better braking performance. The flaps would also "blow back" when engine power was increased during a go-around.[citation needed] The four-engine layout aided lift at low speeds due to the wide span of the propellers blowing air over the wing. When reverse thrust was selected on landing, the props "stole" airflow from the wing, further decreasing lift and increasing the effectiveness of the brakes. More importantly, if an engine failed, the asymmetric thrust was much less than on a twin-engine layout, thereby increasing safety and allowing for a lower minimum control speed with an engine inoperative (Vmc). The engines could actually produce drag in flight at idle speed, allowing fine control of the glide slope.

U.S. Army Airborne Reconnaissance Low RC-7B (later EO-5C) at the Mojave Airport in 2001
U.S. Army Airborne Reconnaissance Low RC-7B (later EO-5C) at the Mojave Airport in 2001

Development started in 1972 and the prototype first flew on 27 March 1975. Testing went smoothly, and the first delivery took place to Rocky Mountain Airways on 3 February 1978. One hundred were delivered by 1984, when the production line was put on hold in favour of the Dash 8. Another 13 were delivered between 1984 and 1988, when the production lines were removed when Boeing bought the company.

The original Series 100 represents the vast majority of the aircraft delivered, and came in two models; the -102 passenger version and -103 combi with an enlarged cargo door. These were followed by the Series 110 which met British CAA requirements, including the -110 and -111, and finally the Series 150 which included additional fuel tankage and an improved interior in the -150 and -151. There were plans for a Series 200 with the new PT6A-50/7 engines which improved hot-and-high power, but these plans were shelved when Boeing ended production of the design.

The mixture of features on the Dash 7 met with limited commercial success. Most turboprop operators used them as feederliners into large airports, where the STOL performance wasn't considered important. In comparison to other feederliners, the Dash 7's four engines required twice the maintenance of a twin-engine model, thereby driving up operational costs. Finally, those airports that did require a high performance STOL operation were generally small and well served by the Twin Otters; had the airport needed a larger plane to serve its customer base, they would have built larger runways. One exception to this was operations at London City Airport which, upon opening in 1987, was capable of handling few aircraft types besides the Dash 7.

The United States Army operates several Dash 7 aircraft as surveillance platforms with the designation RC-7B (EO-5C from 2004)[1] under the Airborne Reconnaissance Low program.

The executives at de Havilland realized they had simply misread the market and ended production in 1988.[citation needed] Learning from their mistakes,[citation needed] de Havilland started the design of a much more "conventional" twin-engine design in 1978, the extremely popular Dash 8. The DHC-7 production line eventually delivered 113, of which four have been lost and one scrapped. Many of the rest remain in service.

The de Havilland Canada DHC-7 has been involved in six accidents with a total of 68 fatalities.[2]

In August 2006, a total of 71 Dash 7 aircraft (all variants) remain in airline service. Major operators include:

Some ten other airlines operate smaller numbers of the aircraft.[3]

A Dash-7 at Stanley, Falkland Islands.
A Dash-7 at Stanley, Falkland Islands.

Flag of Canada Canada
Flag of the United States United States
Flag of Venezuela Venezuela

General characteristics

Performance

  • Hotson, Fred W. The De Havilland Canada Story. Toronto: CANAV Books, 1983. ISBN 0-07-549483-3.

Designation sequence

Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.