From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Georges Canguilhem (June 4, 1904, Castelnaudary – September 11, 1995, Marly-le-Roi) was a French philosopher and member of the Collège de France, who specialized in the philosophy of science and the study of normativity (considering that norms were always the product of a previous normativity power).

Contents 1 Life and work 1.1 Philosophy of Science 1.2 Institutional Role 2 Sources and further reading 3 External links

He entered the Ecole Normale Superieure in 1924 as part of a class that included Jean-Paul Sartre, Raymond Aron, and Paul Nizan. He agregated in 1927 and then taught in lycées throughout France, taking up the study of medicine while teaching in Toulouse.

He took up a post at the University of Strasbourg in 1941, and received his medical doctorate in 1943, in the middle of World War II. Using the pseudonym "Lafont" Canguilhem became active in the French Resistance, serving as a doctor in Auvergne.

By 1948 he was the French equivalent of department chair in philosophy at Strasbourg as well. Seven years later, he was named a professor at the Sorbonne and succeeded Gaston Bachelard as the director of the Institute for the History of Science, a post he occupied until 1971, at which time he undertook an active emeritus career.

Canguilhem's principal work in philosophy of science is presented in two works, namely Le Normal et le pathologique, first published in 1943 and then expanded in 1968 (and translated as The Normal and the Pathological) and La Connaissance de la vie. The former is an extended explorations into the nature and meaning of normality in medicine and biology, the production and institutionalization of medical knowledge. It is still a seminal work in medical anthropology and the history of ideas, and is widely influential in part thanks to Canguilhem's influence on Foucault. The latter is an extended study of the specificity of biology as a science, the historical and conceptual significance of vitalism, and the possibility of conceiving organisms not on the basis of mechanical and technical models that would reduce the organism to a machine, but rather of the organism's relation to the milieu in which it lives, its successful survival (and hence also its relation to genetic "failures" and "abnormalities") in this milieu, and its status as something greater than "the sum of its parts." Canguilhem argued strongly for these positions, criticising 18th and 19th century vitalism (and its politics) but also cautioning against the reduction of biology to a "physical science." He believed such a reduction deprived biology of a proper field of study, ideologically transforming living beings into mechanical structures serving a chemical/physical equilibrium that cannot account for the particularity of organisms or for the complexity of life. He furthered and altered these critiques in a further book, Ideology and Rationality in the History of the Life Sciences.

More than just a great theoretician, Canguilhem was one of the few philosophers of the twentieth century to develop an approach that was shaped by a medical education. He helped define a method of studying the history of science which was practical and rigorous. His work focus on the one hand on the concepts of 'normal' and 'pathological' and, on the other, a critical history of the formation of concepts such as 'reflex' in the history of science. In 1983 he was awarded the Sarton Medal by the History of Science Society. Canguilhem was also a mentor to several French scholars, most notably Michel Foucault, for whom he served as a sponsor in the presentation of 'Histoire de la folie à l'âge classique' for the Doctorat d'État (translated -in part- as Madness and Civilisation) and whose work he throughout the latter's life.

As Inspector General and then President of the Jury d'Agrégation in philosophy, Canguilhem had a tremendous and direct influence over philosophical instruction in France in the latter half twentieth century and was known to more than a generation of French academic philosophers as a demanding and exacting evaluator who, as Louis Althusser remarked, believed he could correct the philosophical understanding of teachers by bawling them out. This belief did not prevent him from being regarded with considerable affection by the generation of intellectuals that came to the fore in the 1960s, including Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Louis Althusser, and Jacques Lacan. Althusser once wrote to his English translator that "my debt to Canguilhem is incalculable" (italics in the original, from Economy and Society 27, page 171). Likewise, Foucault, in his introduction to Canguilhem's The Normal and the Pathological, wrote:

"Take away Canguilhem and you will no longer understand much about Althusser, Althusserism and a whole series of discussions which have taken place among French Marxists; you will no longer grasp what is specific to sociologists such as Bourdieu, Castel, Passerson and what marks them so strongly within sociology; you will miss an entire aspect of the theoretical work done by psychoanalysts, particularly by the followers of Lacan. Further, in the entire discussion of ideas which preceded or followed the movement of '68, it is easy to find the place of those who, from near or from afar, had been trained by Canguilhem."

Derrida (who failed his agrégation on first attempt) recalled that Canguilhem advised him early in his career that he would have to distinguish himself as a serious scholar before he could exhibit professionally the particular philosophical sense of humour for which he is at turns famous and notorious, advice which Derrida seemed to have taken in earnest.

After years of neglect, the past decade has seen a great deal of Canguilhem's writings translated into English. Among them are a collection of essays entitled A Vital Rationalist and his most celebrated work, The Normal and the Pathological.

• Michel Foucault, "Introduction" to Georges Canguilhem, The Normal and the Pathological, [New York: Zone Books, 1991].
• François Dagonet, Georges Canguilhem: Philosophie de la vie, [Paris: 1997].
• Special issue of Economy and Society dedicated to Georges Canguilhem. Economy and Society 27:2-3. 1998.
• R. Horton, "Georges Canguilhem: philosopher of disease," Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 88 (1995): 316-319.
• Étienne Balibar et al, Georges Canguilhem: philosophe, historien des sciences, [Paris: Albin Michel, 1993].

• Centre Georges Canguilhem
• Georges Canguilhem biography by Jim Marshall of the University of Auckland.