Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem is a result about voting systems designed to choose a single winner from the preferences of certain individuals, where each individual ranks all candidates in order of preference. It states that, for three or more candidates, one of the following three things must hold for every voting rule:

  1. The rule is dictatorial, or
  2. There is some candidate who cannot win, under the rule, in any circumstances, or
  3. The rule is manipulable (i.e. susceptible to tactical voting), in the sense that there are conditions under which a voter with full knowledge of how the other voters are to vote and of the rule being used would have an incentive to vote in a manner that does not reflect his preferences.

Since rules which forbid certain candidates from winning or which are dictatorial are not suitable for real-life voting systems, all democratic systems either are manipulable or do not meet the preconditions of the theorem. Taylor shows that the result holds even if ties are allowed in the ballots: the winner is then chosen from the candidates tied at the top of the dictator's ballot.

Arrow's impossibility theorem is a similar theorem that deals with voting systems designed to yield a complete preference order of the candidates, rather than only choosing a winner. Similarly, the Duggan-Schwartz theorem deals with voting systems that choose a (nonempty) set of winners rather than a single winner.

  • Allan Gibbard, "Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result", Econometrica, Vol. 41, No. 4 (1973), pp. 587–601.
  • Mark A. Satterthwaite, "Strategy-proofness and Arrow's Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions", Journal of Economic Theory 10 (April 1975), 187-217.
  • Alan D. Taylor, "The manipulability of voting systems", The American Mathematical Monthly, April 2002.
Image:Mathapplied-stub_ico.png This applied mathematics-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.