Great Ape personhood

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Animal rights

Activists
Greg Avery · David Barbarash
Rod Coronado · Barry Horne
Ronnie Lee · Keith Mann
Ingrid Newkirk · Andrew Tyler
Jerry Vlasak · Robin Webb

Groups/campaigns
Animal Aid
Animal Liberation Front
Animal liberation movement
Animal Rights Militia
BUAV · Great Ape Project
Justice Department
PETA
PCRM · SPEAK
Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty
Viva!

Issues
Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act
Animal rights
Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986
Animal testing · Bile bear
Factory farming
International trade in primates
Nafovanny
Non-human primate experiments
Operation Backfire
Speciesism

Cases
Britches
Cambridge University primates
Covance · Huntingdon Life Sciences
Pit of despair · Silver Spring monkeys
Unnecessary Fuss

Writers/advocates
Steven Best · Stephen R.L. Clark
Gary Francione · Gill Langley
Tom Regan · Richard D. Ryder
Peter Singer · Steven M. Wise

Categories
Animal experimentation
Animal Liberation Front
Animal rights movement

Animal rights
This box: view  talk  edit

Advocates of Great Ape personhood consider common chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans (the hominid apes) to be persons. They seek legal recognition of this status.

Well-known advocates are primatologist Jane Goodall, appointed a goodwill ambassador for the United Nations to fight the bushmeat trade and end ape extinction; Richard Dawkins, Professor for the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University, [1] Peter Singer, professor of philosophy at Princeton University; Alan Dershowitz and Laurence Tribe of Harvard Law School; and attorney and former Harvard professor Steven Wise. [1]

Goodall's longitudinal studies revealed the social and family life of chimps to be very similar to that of human beings in most respects. She herself calls them individuals, and says they relate to her as an individual member of the clan. Laboratory studies of ape language ability began to reveal other human traits, as did genetics, and eventually three of the great apes were reclassified as hominids.

This, plus rising ape extinction and the animal-rights movement has put pressure on nations to recognize apes as having limited rights and being legal "persons". In response, the United Kingdom introduced a ban on research using Great Apes, although testing on other non-human primates continues. [2]

Contents

Professor Steve Jones of the University of London has raised concerns over this movement. He has based his opposition on the fact that although great apes share over 98% of DNA with humans, all other species of life share common DNA to a certain extent. In addition he has remarked;

"Rights and responsibilities go together and I've yet to see a chimp imprisoned for stealing a banana because they don't have a moral sense of what's right and wrong. To give them rights is to give them something without asking for anything in return."[3]

Kenan Malik argues in his book Man, Beast and Zombie that demonstrations of apes supposedly using language have lacked rigour, and that there is no evidence that apes possess a natural capacity for language, abstract concepts, or symbolic thought; they do not possess anything like humans' awareness of self. [4] Malik specifically opposes Singer's proposal for Great Apes to be accorded basic rights.[5]


  1. ^ Motavalli, Jim. "Rights from Wrongs. A Movement to Grant Legal Protection to Animals is Gathering Force", E Magazine, March/April 2003.
  2. ^ http://education.guardian.co.uk/businessofresearch/story/0,,1663535,00.html
  3. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6505691.stm
  4. ^ Kenan Malik, Man, Beast and Zombie (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2000): 214-17.
  5. ^ Kenan Malik, Man, Beast and Zombie (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2000): 371-72

Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.