From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The factual accuracy of part of this article is disputed. The dispute is about evidence (or lack thereof) that this platform is held by any organized political entity. Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page.

Part of a series on Libertarianism
Schools of thought
Agorism Anarcho-capitalism Autarchism Geolibertarianism Green libertarianism Left-libertarianism Libertarian feminism Minarchism Neolibertarianism Paleolibertarianism Progressive libertarianism Right-libertarianism Voluntaryism
Origins
Austrian School Chicago School Classical liberalism Individualist anarchism
Ideas
Civil liberties Economic freedom Free markets Free trade Humanism Laissez-faire Liberty Individualism Non-aggression Private property Self-ownership Tax cuts
Topics
Economic views History Movement Parties Theories of law Views of rights Criticism of libertarianism Libertarian Republican Libertarian Democrat
Politics Portal
This box:  v • d • e

Green libertarianism is a political philosophy that has developed in the United States. Based upon a mixture of political third party values, such as the environmental platform from the U.S. Green Party and the civil liberties platform of the U.S. Libertarian Party, the green libertarian philosophy attempts to consolidate socially progressive values with economic conservatism.^[1]

A green libertarian would be an individual who adheres to libertarian political philosophy as well as to green ideology. While these are not traditionally seen going hand-in-hand, the two are not necessarily incompatible. For example, free market economics and environmentalism are combined in the concept of free market environmentalism. And there has recently been an interest in "how to bring green sensibilities into line with the free-market agenda of libertarians."^[2]

The biggest debate among green libertarians is how to balance ecology with economics. The green libertarian philosophy confronts conflict between the principles of environmental protection and economic free trade by stressing that the two can go hand-in-hand, only with corporate responsibility and accountability. According to some green libertarians, government intervention is required if big business is apathetic to environmental stability.

Green libertarians agree that the government itself is the biggest polluter.^{[citation needed]} Therefore, the government should be held accountable to all the same environmental regulations they place on businesses. The problem is that, whereas one can sue private corporations for its damage to the environment, the government protects itself from the same suits; therefore green libertarians call for the abolition of sovereign immunity.

The green libertarian philosophy supports limited government. Green libertarians advocate cutting the size and scope of the federal government substantially to maximize civil liberties and encourage private charity. However, they would expand the understanding of the classic libertarian motto "your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins" to include pollution as force-initiation which may be regulated.

Although many libertarians are against government regulation of business in regard to the economy, such intervention could easily be justified. A justification could look like this:

1. Pollution creates health hazards. Individuals have to pay themselves to maintain their health. Therefore, pollution is stealing.
2. Destabilization of the biosphere is initiation of force.
3. Allow that the minimal state is justified.
4. The minimal state must prevent and punish violations of the nonaggression principle.
5. Therefore, environmental regulation in a minimal state is justified.

• Natural Capitalism
• Eco-capitalism
• Property and Environment Research Center
• wise use