Majoritarian

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A majoritarian electoral system is one which is based on single-member constituencies. The term is used particularly in the famous studies of Arend Lijphart.

It is more or less synonymous with a plurality voting system.

Only one member can win each constituency, which therefore means the number of votes won nationally does not equal the number of seats in the parliament. For instance, a party which wins 51% of the vote in all constituencies will win 100% of seats, but only 51% of votes.

In the simplest majoritarian system, "first past the post", the winner does not even need a majority in a constituency. This can be demonstrated in a hypothetical constituency election result:

Labour 35%
Conservative 33 %
Liberal Democrat 30 %
Other Parties 2 %

In this case, Labour will take the seat and no other party will gain anything from this constituency.

The effect of a majoritarian system is that the larger parties gain a disproportionately large share of the vote, while smaller parties are left with a disproportionately small share of the vote. For example, the 2005 UK General election results were as follows:

[discuss] – [edit]
Summary of the 5 May 2005 House of Commons of the United Kingdom election results (parties with more than one seat; not incl. N. Ireland)
Seats
This table indicates those parties with over one seat, mainland only
Seats % Votes % Votes
Labour Party 356 55.2 35.3 9,562,122
Conservative Party 198 30.7 32.3 8,772,598
Liberal Democrats 62 9.6 22.1 5,981,874
Scottish National Party 6 0.9 1.5 412,267
Plaid Cymru 3 0.5 0.6 174,838
646 27,110,727

It can be seen that Labour took a majority of seats, 55%, with only 35% of the vote. The largest two parties took 67.5% of votes and 86% of seats. Meanwhile, the smaller Liberal Democrat party took a fifth of votes but only about a tenth of the seats in parliament, and no other party not on this chart took more than one mainland seat.

The majoritarian system is praised for producing stable majorities in parliament, but is criticised for representing only the largest parties and under-representing more minority opinions. It is considered best in countries where the ostensibly fairer proportionally representative system would produce a fragmented parliament, but which are not so unstable that an under-representation of minorities and opinion fragmentation will cause violence or disorder.

Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.