From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Newsgroup spam is a type of spam where the targets are Usenet newsgroups.

Spamming of Usenet newsgroups actually pre-dates e-mail spam. The first widely recognized Usenet spam (though not the most famous) was posted on January 18, 1994 by Clarence L. Thomas IV, a sysadmin at Andrews University.^[1][2] Entitled "Global Alert for All: Jesus is Coming Soon",^[3] it was a fundamentalist religious tract claiming that "this world's history is coming to a climax." The newsgroup posting bot Serdar Argic also appeared in early 1994, posting tens of thousands of messages to various newsgroups, consisting of identical copies of a political screed relating to the Armenian Genocide.

The first commercial Usenet spam,^[4][2] and the one which is often (mistakenly) claimed to be the first Usenet spam of any sort, was an advertisement for legal services entitled "Green Card Lottery - Final One?".^[5] It was posted in April 1994 by Arizona lawyers Laurence Canter and Martha Siegel, and hawked legal representation for United States immigrants seeking papers ("green cards").

Usenet convention defines spamming as excessive multiple posting, that is, the repeated posting of a message (or substantially similar messages). During the early 1990s there was substantial controversy among Usenet system administrators (news admins) over the use of cancel messages to control spam. A cancel message is a directive to news servers to delete a posting, causing it to be inaccessible to those who might read it. Some regarded this as a bad precedent, leaning towards censorship, while others considered it a proper use of the available tools to control the growing spam problem.

A culture of neutrality towards content precluded defining spam on the basis of advertisement or commercial solicitations. The word "spam" was usually taken to mean excessive multiple posting (EMP), and other neologisms were coined for other abuses — such as "velveeta" (from the processed cheese product) for excessive cross-posting.^[6] A subset of spam was deemed cancellable spam, for which it is considered justified to issue third-party cancel messages.^[7]

In the late 1990s, spam became used as a means of vandalising newsgroups, with malicious users committing acts of sporgery to make targeted newsgroups all but unreadable without heavily filtering. A prominent example occurred in alt.religion.scientology. Another known example is the Meow Wars.

The prevalence of Usenet spam led to the development of the Breidbart Index as an objective measure of a message's "spamminess". The use of the BI and spam-detection software has led to Usenet being policed by anti-spam volunteers, who purge newsgroups of spam by sending cancels and filtering it out on the way into servers. This very active form of policing has meant that Usenet is a far less attractive target to spammers than it used to be, and most of the industrial-scale spammers have now moved into e-mail spam instead.

• [Message Poster 2003]

1. ^ Templeton, Brad. Origin of the term "spam" to mean net abuse. Retrieved on July 11, 2006.
2. ^ ^{a b} 20 Year Archive on Google Groups. Google (2003). Retrieved on July 11, 2006.
3. ^ http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=9401191510.AA18576%40jse.stat.ncsu.edu
4. ^ History of Spam. Mailmsg.com. Retrieved on July 11, 2006.
5. ^ http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=2odj9q%2425q%40herald.indirect.com
6. ^ http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/V/velveeta.html
7. ^ http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/spam-faq/

• Sporgery