Operation Fortitude

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Operation Fortitude was the codename for the deception operations used by the Allied forces during World War II in connection with the Normandy landings (Operation Overlord). It was divided into Fortitude North, a threat to invade Norway, and Fortitude South, designed to induce the Germans to believe that the main invasion of France would occur in the Pas de Calais rather than Normandy. Fortitude South was one of the most successful deception operations of the war, and arguably the most important.

Both Fortitude North and Fortitude South were related to a wider deception plan called Operation Bodyguard.

Contents

The principle objective of Fortitude was to ensure that the opposition faced by the troops invading Normandy would be weak enough to ensure Allied success. Equally important was to delay the movement of German reserves to the Normandy beachhead, and prevent a potentially disastrous counterattack. The plan therefore aimed to persuade the Germans that additional assaults were planned - specifically in Scandinavia and in the Pas de Calais. This leading to the Allied Victory at D-Day [operation overlord.]

The overall strategic plan for deception by the Allies in 1944 was planned by London Controlling Section and laid out in Operation Bodyguard. However the actual conduct of such deceptions was the task of the commanders in the theatres in which the deception was to occur. The execution of the deception 'cover plan' for Overlord was therefore the responsibility of SHAEF under General Eisenhower. A special section called "Ops (B)" was established at SHAEF to handle deception.

It was initially envisioned that deception would occur through five main channels:

  1. Physical deception: the creation in the mind of the enemy of non-existent units through fake infrastructure and equipment, such as wooden tanks or landing craft.
  2. Controlled leaks of information through diplomatic channels which might be passed on via neutral countries to the Germans.
  3. Wireless traffic: the creation of non-existent units through simulation of the wireless traffic that such units would generate, which would be detected by the enemy
  4. Use of German agents controlled by the Allies through the Double Cross System to send false information to the German intelligence services
  5. Public presence of notable staff associated with phantom groups such as FUSAG (First U.S. Army Group), most notably George S. Patton, the best known Allied tank commander.

During the course of Fortitude the almost complete lack of German aerial reconnaissance, together with the absence of uncontrolled German agents in Britain came to make physical deception almost irrelevant. The unreliability of the 'diplomatic leaks' resulted in their discontinuance. The majority of deception was carried out by means of false wireless traffic and through German double agents. The latter was to prove by far the most significant.

Although Fortitude was controlled from SHAEF, London Controlling Section retained responsibility for what was called "Special Means": the use of diplomatic channels and double-agents.

The Germans had about 50 agents in England at the time, but B1A (the Counter-Intelligence Division of MI5) had caught and recruited many of them as double agents. In fact, although they did not know it, MI5 controlled all of the German agents in Britain at the time. They planned to feed German Intelligence a misleading picture of the invasion preparations via their own agents. Reports sent by these agents were carefully controlled in order to support the view of forces in the UK which the Allied deception planners wished to present.

The three key double agents for Fortitude were:

  • GARBO: Juan Pujol was a Spaniard who had got himself recruited to German intelligence and then offered to work for the British. He created a huge network of false sub-agents by the time of Fortitude. He was awarded the Iron Cross after D-Day.
  • BRUTUS: Roman Garby-Czerniawski was a Polish officer; captured by the Germans he was offered a chance to work for them as a spy. On his arrival in Britain he immediately turned himself in to British intelligence.
  • TRICYCLE: Duško Popov, a Yugoslav lawyer.

Fortitude North was the fictitious assault on Scandinavia. It consisted of two parts: first a plan to re-occupy any parts of occupied Scandinavia that might be weakened by withdrawal of German troops; second an assault on Norway.

The (fictional) unit assigned to this operation was the British Fourth Army, which was located in Scotland. Since German reconnaissance was never likely in Scotland the primary means of deception were the use of double agents, though the radio traffic of the imaginary units assigned to the Fourth Army was simulated by radio operators.

British diplomats also began negotiations with neutral Sweden in order to obtain concessions that would be useful in the event of an invasion of Norway, such as the right to fly reconnaissance missions over Sweden and the right to refuel planes that made emergency landings. These negotiations were made not in the hope of obtaining the concessions but with the intention that news of the negotiations would reach the ears of the Germans.

The units making up Fourth Army varied throughout 1944. Some were real units whose actual role and organization was disguised by agent reports; some were entirely fictitious. The order of battle at the peak of the operation was as follows:

British Fourth Army fictional - HQ Edinburgh

  • British II Corps (fictional - HQ Stirling)
    • 55th British Division (Northern Ireland)
    • 58th Division (fictional, Aberlour)
    • British 113th Independent Infantry Brigade (garrison for Orkney and Shetland Islands)
  • United States XV Corps (Northern Ireland)
    • 2nd US Infantry Division
    • 5th US Infantry Division
    • 8th US Infantry Division

Fortitude South was conducted with the intention of convincing the Germans that an invasion would come to the Pas de Calais - a logical strategic choice for an invasion since it was the closest part of France to England and its beaches were not easily defended. While it was hoped that this would reduce the number of troops in the Normandy area at the time of the invasion, even more important was to dissuade the Germans from reinforcing the Normandy battleground in the days immediately after the invasion. To this end the Allies hoped to convince the Germans that the Normandy invasion, when it occurred, was a diversion, and the main invasion was still to come near Calais.

The key element of Fortitude South was Operation Quicksilver. It entailed the creation of the belief in German minds that the Allied force consisted of two army groups, 21st Army Group under Montgomery (the genuine Normandy invasion force), and 1st U.S. Army Group (FUSAG) (a fictitious force under General George Patton), positioned in southeastern England for a crossing at the Pas de Calais.

At no point were the Germans fed false documents describing the invasion plans. Instead they were allowed to construct a misleading order of battle for the allied forces. To mount a massive invasion of Europe from England, military planners had little choice but to stage units around the country with those that would land first nearest to the embarkation point. By placing FUSAG in the south-east, German intelligence would (and did) deduce that the center of gravity of the invasion force was opposite Calais, the point on the French coast closest to England and therefore a likely landing point.

In order to facilitate this deception additional buildings were constructed; dummy vehicles and landing craft were placed around possible embarkation points. A huge amount of false radio traffic was transmitted, commensurate with a force of that size.

A deception of such a size required input from many organisations, including MI5, MI6, SHAEF via Ops B, and the armed services. Information from the various deception agencies was organized by and channeled through the London Controlling Section under the direction of Lieutenant-Colonel John Bevan.

The Allies were able to easily judge the effectiveness of these strategies. ULTRA intelligence — that gained from the breaking of German codes and ciphers, such as the Enigma machine — was able to provide an indication of the German high command's responses to their actions. They maintained the pretense of FUSAG and other forces threatening Pas de Calais for some considerable time after D-Day, possibly even as late as September 1944. This was vital to the success of the Allied plan since it forced the Germans to keep most of their reserves bottled up waiting for an attack on Calais which never came, thereby allowing the Allies to maintain and build upon their marginal foothold in Normandy.

The basis of Operation FORTITUDE SOUTH was a fictitious invasion by six Allied divisions around Cap Gris Nez (the point of land closest to Dover). The Germans defended this area with a single, third-rate coastal division (47th). Despite the claim of many authors that Fortitude 'pinned the Panzer divisions in Calais' there were, in fact no panzer divisions in the area. The Germans, based on their own calculations, feared an invasion between the Seine and the Somme, which does not contain Calais nor Cap Gris Nez. They left two good infantry divisions (84 & 85)in this area and kept panzer divisions where they could respond either to an invasion in this area or a break-out by the British near Caen. They paid no heed to any threat to Calais or Cap Gris Nez. The alleged success of Fortitude south is then only a fraud perpetrated on history, primarily by the British intelligence services involved.

Some of the key reasons why this operation was so successful:

  • The long term view taken by British Intelligence to cultivate these agents as channels of misinformation to the enemy.
  • The use of ULTRA decrypts to read ENIGMA coded messages between Abwehr and German High Command which quickly told them the effectiveness of the deception tactics. This is one of the early uses of a closed-loop deception system.
  • R V Jones, the Assistant Director Intelligence (Science) at the British Air Ministry insisted for reasons of tactical deception that for every radar station attacked within the real invasion area, two were to be attacked outside it.
  • The extensive nature of the German Intelligence machinery, and the rivalry amongst the various elements.

"So how successful was (Operation) Fortitude? It couldn't have been more successful"Stephen Ambrose


 v  d  e 
Main articles on Battle of Normandy, Western Front, World War II
Operations Key locations See also

Landing Points:

Other key locations:

More information on Battle of Normandy:

 D-day from Wiktionary
 D-day Textbooks from Wikibooks
 D-day Quotations from Wikiquote
 D-day Source texts from Wikisource
 D-day Images and media from Commons
 D-day from Wikinews

Eye of the Needle, is a novel, and later a movie about a Nazi spy figuring out the Allied deception, and racing to let the German leadership know. The Unlikely Spy is a novel that focuses on both Allied attempts to carry out Fortitude, as well as a German agent's race to discover the true plans

  • Howard, Sir Michael, Strategic Deception (British Intelligence in the Second World War, Volume 5) (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1990)
  • Holt, Thaddeus, The Deceivers: Allied Military Deception in the Second World War (Scribner, New York, 2004)
  • Harris, Tomas, "GARBO, The Spy Who Saved D-Day", Richmond, Surrey, England: Public Record Office, 2000, ISBN 1-873162-81-2
  • Hesketh, Roger, "Fortitude", Overlook Press, New York, 2000, ISBN 1-58567-075-8
  • Latimer, Jon, "Deception in War", Overlook Press, New York, 2001 ISBN 978-1585673810
  • Masters thesis of Whitney Talley Bendeck

Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.