People Power Revolution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from People Power)
Jump to: navigation, search
Commemorative statue of the Revolution at Camp Aguinaldo
Commemorative statue of the Revolution at Camp Aguinaldo

The People Power Revolution (also known as the EDSA Revolution and the Philippine Revolution of 1986) was a series of nonviolent and prayerful mass street demonstrations in the Philippines that occurred in 1986.[1] The protests were the culmination of a long resistance by the people against the 20-year running authoritarian[2] regime of the current president Ferdinand Marcos and made news headlines as "the revolution that surprised the world".[3] The majority of the demonstrations took place of Epifanio de los Santos Avenue, known more commonly by its acronym EDSA, and involved over 200,000 Filipino civilians as well as several political and military figures. The protests, fueled by a resistance and opposition of years of corrupt governance by Marcos, occurred from February 22 to 25 in 1986, when Marcos fled Malacañang Palace to the United States and conceded[4] to Corazon Aquino as President of the Philippines.[5]

Contents

President Ferdinand Marcos
President Ferdinand Marcos
Opposition Senator Benigno "Ninoy" Aquino Jr.
Opposition Senator Benigno "Ninoy" Aquino Jr.

Throughout his presidency, Ferdinand Marcos had set up a regime in the Philippines that would give him ultimate power over the military and the national treasury. Following his declaration of martial law on September 21, 1972,[6] Marcos immediately began to embezzle money from the government and order the military to kill any political competition against him. As a result, the Philippine economy began to tumble greatly, and the nation lost its competitive edge in Southeast Asia.

Several groups of people, however, even within the government, conspired throughout the term of the Marcos regime to overthrow him. They were led by the popular public figure, opposition senator Benigno "Ninoy" Aquino Jr, said to be leaning to a left-wing solution. While gaining popularity amongst the Filipino people for his stance against Marcos, Aquino was eventually forced to seek exile in the United States for his beliefs after several groups threatened to assassinate him. However, in 1983, despite being warned not to return to the Philippines, Aquino announced that he would fly back to fight for his people.

The Manila Bulletin headline of Aquino's assassination on August 21, 1983
The Manila Bulletin headline of Aquino's assassination on August 21, 1983

Despite several warnings from the military and other pro-Marcos groups not to return to the Philippines, Ninoy Auqino announced that he would return on August 21, 1983, after a three-year exile in the United States, which was celebrated by the Filipino people. However, as he disembarked from his aircraft at the then-Manila International Airport (now named after him in his honour), Aquino was shot and assassinated.[7] His assassination shocked and outraged many Filipino citizens, most of whom by then had lost confidence in the Marcos administration. The event led to more suspicions on the government, triggered non-cooperation among Filipinos that eventually caused more civil disobediences.[8] It also shook the Marcos government, which was by then deteriorating, in part due to Marcos' worsening condition and eventual fatal illness.

The assassination of Ninoy Aquino in 1983 caused the economic problems of the country due to embezzlement by Marcos to deteriorate even further, and the government spiralled further into debt. By the end of 1983, the country was bankrupt, and the economy retracted by 6.8%. [9]

In 1984, Marcos appointed a commission, led by Chief Justice Fernando, to launch an inquiry and investigation into Aquino's assassination. Despite the conclusions it made, Cardinal Jaime Sin, the Archbishop of Manila at the time, declined an offer to sit for the commission, rejecting the government's views on the assassination. In October of that year, Marcos appointed a second commission to investigate. The commission's final report accused the military of staging a conspiracy to assassinate Aquino, dealing another major blow to the already collapsing government.

On November 23, 1985, after pressures from Washington[10], Marcos suddenly announced that a presidential snap elections would take place the following year, one year ahead of the regular presidential election schedule, to legitimize his control over the country.[1] The snap elections was legalized with the passage of Batas Pambansa Blg. 883 (National Law No. 883) by the Marcos-controlled unicameral congress called the Batasang Pambansa. The growing opposition movement encouraged Ninoy Aquino's widow, Corazon Aquino, to run for the presidency with Salvador Laurel for vice-president and as her running mate. Marcos ran for re-election, with Arturo Tolentino as his running mate.

The elections were held on February 7, 1986.[1] The electoral exercise was marred by widespread reports of violence and tampering of election results. The official election canvasser, the Commission on Elections (COMELEC), declared Marcos the winner. The final tally of COMELEC, the government's poll body, had Marcos winning with 10,807,197 votes against Aquino's 9,291,761 votes. On the other hand, the final tally of the National Movement for Free Elections (NAMFREL), an accredited poll watcher, had Aquino winning with 7,835,070 votes against Marcos' 7,053,068 points.

Because of the reports on the alleged fraud, the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) issued a statement condemning the elections. The United States Senate also passed a resolution stating the same condemnation.,[1] US president Ronald Reagan, a friend of Marcos, issued a statement calling the fraud reports as "disturbing".[11] In response to the protest by the aggravated party, COMELEC claimed that Marcos with 53 percent won over Aquino. However, NAMFREL's account retorted that the latter won over Marcos with 52 percent of votes.[12]

Marcos was still proclaimed the winner amidst the widespread election controversy. The Filipino people refused to accept the results, however, asserting that Aquino was the real victor. Both presidentiables had their oath of office in two different places, with the latter gaining mass support. Dismayed by the election frauds, several military officials began to stage a coup attempt aginst Marcos. Learning the military's plans, however, Marcos ordered their leaders' arrest.[13]

Attempts
at regime change
in the Philippines
(1970–2007)

Civil unrest (1970)
People Power (1986)
Claim of Tolentino (1986)
Honasan's First (1987)
Honasan's Second (1989)
Fall of Estrada (2001)
May 1 riots (2001)
Oakwood mutiny (2003)
State of emergency (2006)
Manila Peninsula rebellion (2007)

The then-Vice Chief-of-Staff Fidel Ramos
The then-Vice Chief-of-Staff Fidel Ramos

The events of the revolution started when two key leaders of the military withdrew their support for Marcos.[14] At 6:45 p.m. on Friday, February 22, 1986, the Minister of Defense Juan Ponce Enrile and the Vice Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces Lt. Gen. (later president) Fidel Ramos announced at a press conference that they felt Marcos had stolen the election. Therefore, they declared that they could no longer support Marcos and that Aquino was the rightful president.[15] Subsequently, they barricaded themselves in two military camps: Ramos at Camp Crame, Headquarters of the Philippine Constabulary-Integrated National Police and Enrile at the Ministry of National Defense in Camp Aguinaldo. Both camps faced each other across EDSA in Quezon City, Metro Manila. Supported by only a few hundred fellow soldiers, Enrile and Ramos prepared for the inevitable attack by Marcos-loyal troops led by Gen. Fabian Ver, the Armed Forces Chief of Staff.[15]

A few hours later, Radio Veritas—a Roman Catholic Church radio station which helped amplifying the voice of the Filipinos during the mass revolution and the only non-government-controlled radio station[16]—replayed the press conference nationwide. Marcos himself later conducted his own news conference calling on Enrile and Ramos to surrender, urging them to "stop this stupidity."[15]

At about 9 p.m., in a message aired over Radio Veritas, the highly influential Catholic Archbishop of Manila Jaime Cardinal Sin exhorted Filipinos to come to the aid of the rebel leaders by going to EDSA between Camp Crame and Aguinaldo and giving emotional support, food and other supplies. For many, this seemed an unwise decision since civilians would not stand a chance against a dispersal by government troops. Nevertheless, many people, especially priests and nuns, trooped to EDSA.[15]

Radio Veritas played a critical role during the mass uprising. Nemenzo stated that: "Without Radio Veritas, it would have been difficult, if not possible, to mobilize millions of people in a matter of hours." Similarly, a certain account in the event said that: "Radio Veritas, in fact, was our umbilical cord to whatever else was going."[14]

During the height of the revolution, an estimated one to three million people filled EDSA from Ortigas Avenue all the way to Cubao. The photo above shows the area at the intersection of EDSA and Boni Serrano Avenue, just between Camp Crame and Camp Aguinaldo.
During the height of the revolution, an estimated one to three million people filled EDSA from Ortigas Avenue all the way to Cubao. The photo above shows the area at the intersection of EDSA and Boni Serrano Avenue, just between Camp Crame and Camp Aguinaldo.

At dawn, Sunday, government troops arrived to knock down the main transmitter of Radio Veritas, cutting off broadcasts to people in the provinces. The station switched to a standby transmitter with a limited range of broadcast.[14] The station was targeted because it had proven to be a valuable communications tool for the people supporting the rebels, keeping them informed of government troop movements and relaying requests for food, medicine, and supplies.[15]

Still, people came to EDSA until it swelled to hundreds of thousands of unarmed civilians. The mood in the street was actually very festive, with many bringing whole families. Performers entertained the crowds, nuns and priests led prayer vigils, and people set up barricades and makeshift sandbags, trees, and vehicles in several places along EDSA and intersecting streets such as Santolan and Ortigas Avenue. Everywhere, people listened to Radio Veritas on their radios. Several groups sang Bayan Ko (My Homeland),[17] which, since 1980, had become a patriotic anthem of the opposition. People frequently flashed the LABAN (fight) sign,[18] which is an "L" formed with their thumb and index finger.

Shortly after lunch on February 23, Enrile and Ramos decided to consolidate their positions. Enrile crossed EDSA from Camp Aguinaldo to Camp Crame amidst cheers from the crowd.[15]

In the mid-afternoon, Radio Veritas relayed reports of Marines massing near the camps in the east and tanks approaching from the north and south. A contingent of Marines with tanks and armored vans, led by Brigadier General Artemio Tadiar, was stopped along Ortigas Avenue, about two kilometers from the camps, by tens of thousands of people.[19] Nuns holding rosaries knelt in front of the tanks and men and women linked arms together to block the troops.[20] Tadiar threatened the crowds but they did not budge. In the end, the troops were forced to retreat with no shots fired.[15]

By evening, the standby transmitter of Radio Veritas failed. Shortly after midnight, the staff were able to go to another station to begin broadcasting from a secret location under the moniker "Radyo Bandido" (Bandit Radio). June Keithley was the radio broadcaster who continued Radio Veritas' program throughout the night and in the remaining days.[15]

At dawn on February 24, Monday, the first serious encounter with government troops occurred. Marines marching from Libis, in the east, lobbed tear gas at the demonstrators, who quickly dispersed. Some 3,000 Marines then entered and held the east side of Camp Aguinaldo.[15]

Later, helicopters manned by the 15th Air Force Strike Wing, led by Major General Antonio Sotelo, were ordered from Sangley Point in Cavite to head to Camp Crame.[21] Secretly, the squadron had already defected and instead of attacking Camp Crame, landed in it, with the crowds cheering and hugging the soldiers who came out. The presence of the helicopters boosted the morale of Enrile and Ramos who had been continually encouraging their fellow soldiers to join the opposition movement.[15] In the afternoon, Aquino arrived at the base where Enrile, Ramos, RAM officers and a throng were waiting.[21]

At around that time, June Keithley received reports that Marcos had left Malacañang Palace and broadcasted this to the people at EDSA. The crowd celebrated and even Ramos and Enrile came out from Crame to appear to the crowds. The jubilation was however short-lived as Marcos later appeared on television on the government-controlled Channel 4,[22] declaring that he would not step down. It was thereafter speculated that the false report was a psychological warfare ploy against Marcos to encourage more defections.[15]

During this broadcast, Channel 4 suddenly went off air. A contingent of rebels, under Colonel Mariano Santiago, had captured the station. Channel 4 was put back online, shortly after noon, with a voice declaring, "This is Channel 4. Serving the people again." By this time, the crowds at EDSA had swollen to over a million.[15] (Some estimates placed them at two million.)

In the late afternoon, rebel helicopters attacked Villamor Airbase, destroying presidential vehicles. Another helicopter went to Malacañang, fired a rocket and caused minor damage. Later, most of the officers who had graduated from the Philippine Military Academy (PMA) defected; the majority of the Armed Forces had already changed sides.[15]

Audio sample:

The actual dialogue on TV went as follows:

Fabian Ver: We have to immobilize the helicopters they've got. We have two fighter planes flying now to strike at any time, sir.
Ferdinand Marcos: My order is not to attack.
Ver: They are massing civilians near our troops and we cannot keep on withdrawing. You asked me to withdraw yesterday....
Marcos (interrupting): My order is to disperse [them] without shooting them.
Ver: We cannot withdraw all the time...
Marcos: No, no, no! Hold on. You disperse the crowds without shooting them. You may use any other weapon...

Incoming President Corazon Aquino
Incoming President Corazon Aquino

On the morning of February 25, Tuesday, at around 7 a.m., a minor clash occurred between loyal government troops and the reformists. Snipers stationed atop the government-owned Channel 9 tower, near Channel 4, began shooting at the reformists. Many rebel soldiers surged to the station.[15]

Later in the morning, Corazon Aquino was inaugurated as President of the Philippines in a simple ceremony at Club Filipino[23] in Greenhills, about a kilometer from Camp Crame. She was sworn in as President by Senior Associate Justice Claudio Teehankee, and Laurel as Vice-President by Justice Vicente Abad Santos. The Bible on which Aquino swore her oath was held by Aurora Aquino, the mother of Ninoy Aquino. Attending the ceremonies were Ramos, who was then promoted to General, Enrile, and many politicians.[15] Outside Club Filipino, all the way to EDSA, about hundreds of people cheered and celebrated. Bayan Ko (My Homeland, a popular folk song and the unofficial national anthem) was sung after Aquino's oath-taking. Many people wore yellow, the color of Aquino's campaign for presidency.

An hour later, Marcos conducted the inauguration at Malacañang. Loyalist civilians attended the ceremony, shouting "Marcos, Marcos, Marcos pa rin! (Marcos, Marcos, still Marcos!)". On the Palace balcony, Marcos took his oath as the President of the Philippines, broadcast by the remaining government television channels and channel 7.[15] None of the invited foreign dignitaries attended the ceremony for security reason (although Moscow sent a congratulatory message). The couple finally stepped out in the balcony of the palace in front of the 3000 KBL loyalists who were shouting to Marcos: "Capture the snakes!"[24] First Lady Imelda Marcos sang one more rendition of "Dahil Sa Iyo" (Because of You), the couple's theme song, rather tearfully,[24] chanting her trademark Tagalog entreaties:

Because of you I attained happiness
I offer you my love
If it is true that you shall enslave me
All of this is because of you.[24]

After the inauguration, the Marcos family and their close associates hurriedly rushed to leave the Palace. The broadcast of the event was also cut off as rebel troops successfully captured the other stations.[15]

By this time, tens of hundreds of people had amassed at the barricades along Mendiola, only a hundred meters away from Malacañang. They were prevented from storming the Palace by loyal government troops securing the area. The angry demonstrators were pacified by priests who warned them not to be violent.[15]

The Inquirer's headline on 26 Feb., 1986.
The Inquirer's headline on 26 Feb., 1986.

At 3:00 p.m., Monday, (American time) Marcos talked to US Senator Paul Laxalt,[24] asking for advice from the White House. Laxalt advised him to "cut and cut cleanly",[24] to which Marcos expressed his disappointment after a short pause. In the afternoon, Marcos talked to Enrile, asking for safe passage for him and his family. Finally, at 9:00 p.m., the Marcos family was transported by four American helicopters[2] to Clark Air Base in Angeles City, Pampanga, about 83 kilometers north of Manila, before heading on to Guam, and finally to Hawaii.[15][3]

When the news of Marcos' departure reached the people, many rejoiced and danced in the streets. Over at Mendiola, the demonstrators were finally able to enter Malacañang Palace, long denied to Filipinos in the past decade. Looting by overly angry protesters occurred, but mostly people wandered inside, looking at the place where all the decisions that changed the course of Philippine history had been made.

Many people around the world rejoiced and congratulated Filipinos they knew. Bob Simon, an anchorman at CBS said, "We Americans like to think we taught the Filipinos democracy; well, tonight they are teaching the world."[15]

Despite the EDSA revolution, the democratic political system of the Philippines is still fragile and flawed. Patronage politics still hinders the development of democracy and resources are still at the hands of the few. However, the fall of Marcos and the collapse of the Communist movements has discouraged non-democratic alternatives to politics. The revolution also provided the restoration of democratic institutions after thirteen years of authoritarian rule. These institutions can be used by political and social actors to challenge the entrenched political clans and develop Philippine democracy.[25]

While the EDSA Revolution is almost universally acknowledged as a great example of democracy at work, many political scientists and sociologists have commented that the Philippines has largely failed to actualize the possible gains from a fresh change in government, including the new constitution. Among the conditions cited are the overall slow growth of the Philippine economy, especially compared to that of other nearby Southeast Asian countries, the essentially unchanged political atmosphere in the country, and the general feeling of worsening living conditions, especially among the poor sectors of society.

Many people, particularly vocal activist groups and non-governmental organizations, have decried the return to power of many of the individuals associated with the Marcos regime. Many would also argue that the run of politics in the country did not change, only the politicians. Nepotism is still widespread, with many places in the Philippines being bailiwicks of local political dynasties. The concept of the trapo (rag) or the "traditional politician", which is a term used to describe an old, corrupt politician who clings to power, have solidified in the administrations after Marcos. Essentially, the EDSA Revolution served to replace the old trapos with new and opportunistic ones who immediately denounced the Marcos regime for their own gains in the 1987 elections.

Some political scientists have even said that the Philippines today is one of the worst examples of a democratic state; that the Philippines is still not ready for true democracy. Some Filipinos have labeled Philippine democracy as the tyranny of the masses, mob rule, or Ochlocracy. Traditional politicians cling to old posts, while Filipinos have frequently voted into office movie and TV actors and actresses, and other celebrities, whether they were capable or not. One critic called this phenomenon a "showbiztocracy".

While the EDSA Revolution drove out a strongman, the situation that emerged is, according to critics, even worse. Evidence of this may be seen in today's Philippine society, which has been polarized. Another, the 1987 Constitution adopted after Marcos' ouster left future Presidents vulnerable to "revolutions" such as this one, as evidenced by former President Joseph Estrada's ouster, and the various attempts to oust President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. The constitutionality of the Revolution was also disputed because the historic events, from the snap election to the Revolution, up to the exile of Marcos, were done through extra-constitutional means. This has become a moot point since a new constitution was adopted in 1987.

  1. ^ a b c d Zunes, Stephen et. Al (1999), Nonviolent Social Movements: A Geographical Perspective, Blackwell Publishing, p. 129, ISBN 1577180763, <http://books.google.com/books?id=rlIH-NQbFQgC&pg=PA129&dq=Philippine+People+power+revolution&sig=7ySJUQMNs_CGk1eRVRlEqYqACv8#PPA129,M1>. Retrieved on 2007-12-03.
  2. ^ a b Halperin, Jonathan J. (1987), The Other Side: How Soviets and Americans Perceive Each Other, Transaction Publishers, p. 63, ISBN 0887386873, <http://books.google.com/books?id=H1so7Od--csC&pg=PA63&dq=Marcos+departure&sig=CY-uUSrVrHjMDmSJ-2ikvXrl5TY>. Retrieved on 2007-12-03.
  3. ^ a b Kumar, Ravindra, Mahatma Gandhi at the Close of 20th Cen., Anmol Publications PVT. LTD., p. 168, ISBN 8126117362, <http://books.google.com/books?id=lTNpstqGlAMC&pg=PA168&dq=EDSA+Revolution&sig=RWRvAUMNSnSXer3slFLqGK6EJO0>. Retrieved on 2007-12-02.
  4. ^ The Original People Power Revolution. Angela Stuart-Santiago. Retrieved on 2007-12-03.
  5. ^ McFerson, Hazel M. (2002), Mixed Blessing: The Impact of the American Colonial Experience on Politics ..., Greenwood Press, p. 153, ISBN 0313307911, <http://books.google.com/books?id=7FPLWmaGQpEC&pg=PA153&dq=EDSA+Revolution&sig=0MVAAaGBzZxmnAFet4MuUW1Tss0>. Retrieved on 2007-12-02.
  6. ^ Schirmer, Daniel B. & Shalom, Stephen Rosskamm (1987), The Philippines Reader: A History of Colonialism, Neocolonialism ..., South End Press, p. 225, ISBN 089608275X, <http://books.google.com/books?id=TXE73VWcsEEC&pg=PA225&dq=Philippine+Martial+Law+declared+by+Marcos&sig=CnNhnzMPMXCGcYv7WadNusDpjl0>. Retrieved on 2007-12-05.
  7. ^ Javate-De Dios, Aurora et. Al, ed. (1988), Dictatorship and Revolution: Roots of People's Power, Conspectus Foundation Incorporated, pp. 132, ISBN 991-91080-1-8.
  8. ^ Schock, Kurt (2005). "People Power Unleashed: South Africa and the Philippines", Unarmed Insurrections: People Power Movements in Nondemocracies. University of Minnesota Press, 56. ISBN 0816641927. 
  9. ^ Lakas Ng Bayan: The People's Power/EDSA Revolution 1986 (third paragraph). University of Alberta, Canada. Retrieved on 2007-12-10.
  10. ^ Election developments in the Philippines - President Reagan's statement - transcript. US Department of State Bulletin, April, 1986. Retrieved on 2007-12-03.
  11. ^ PRESIDENT'S STATEMENT, FEB. 11, 1986. US Department of State Bulletin, April, 1986. Retrieved on 2007-12-03.
  12. ^ Schock, Kurt, Unarmed Insurrections: People Power Movements in Nondemocracies, p. 77, <http://books.google.com/books?id=RRVk5qJpOH8C&pg=PA77&dq=Cory+Aquino+1986+inauguration&sig=KKedzVOUym3FD_si5OU-rTl6RBc#PPA77,M1>. Retrieved on 2007-12-03.
  13. ^ West, Lois A. (1997), Militant Labor in the Philippines, Temple University Press, p. 19-20, ISBN 1566394910, <http://books.google.com/books?id=KcaOhzm8gAQC&pg=PA20&dq=Philippine+People+power+revolution&sig=GbAyNRVoUOtriANs55Jl3lM85OQ#PPA20,M1>. Retrieved on 2007-12-03.
  14. ^ a b c McCargo, Duncan (2003), Media and Politics in Pacific Asia, Routledge, p. 20, ISBN 0415233755, <http://books.google.com/books?id=CuGJ575iLLAC&pg=PA20&dq=Radio+Veritas+1986+Philippine+revolution&sig=6KgtwGf7fFlJGSgA1mMSCHSiAtY>. Retrieved on 2007-12-03.
  15. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Paul Sagmayao, Mercado; Francisco S. Tatad (1986). People Power: The Philippine Revolution of 1986: An eyewitness history. Manila, Philippines: The James B. Reuter, S.J., Foundation. ISBN 0963942078. 
  16. ^ Hamburg, David A. et. Al., ed. (1998), Preventing Deadly Conflict, DIANE Publishing, pp. 115, ISBN 0788170902, <http://books.google.com/books?id=_3_c7OlLUBAC&pg=PA115&dq=Radio+Veritas+1986+Philippine+revolution&sig=kgObjoqgpwXeNxYklwn-xdQhuF8#PPA115,M1>.
  17. ^ Taylor, Robert H. (2002), The Idea of Freedom in Asia and Africa, Stanford University Press, p. 210, ISBN 0804745145, <http://books.google.com/books?id=RfbSlkGP8TEC&pg=PA210&dq=Bayan+Ko+in+1986+Philippine+revolution&sig=4mXbSuab0bitdIn388cnqEz--WM>. Retrieved on 2007-12-03.
  18. ^ Crisostomo, Isabelo T. (1987), Cory, Profile of a President: The Historic Rise to Power of Corazon ..., Branden Books, p. 217, ISBN 0828319138, <http://books.google.com/books?id=iW_ddLowBYkC&pg=PA217&dq=LABAN+signs+during+EDSA+I&sig=Akqi1anF8mOXKXo8dclSjbk7q3E#PPA217,M1>. Retrieved on 2007-12-03.
  19. ^ Lizano, Lolita (1988), Flower in a Gun Barrel: The Untold Story of the Edsa Revolution, <http://books.google.com/books?id=Bm0yAAAAIAAJ&dq=EDSA+Revolution&q=EDSA+Revolution&pgis=1#search>. Retrieved on 2007-12-02.
  20. ^ Merkl, Peter H. (2005), The Rift Between America And Old Europe: the distracted eagle, Routledge, p. 144, ISBN 0415359856, <http://books.google.com/books?id=WavpuvE2HA4C&pg=PA144&dq=EDSA+Revolution&sig=MHtMBpwLhkNbXWDv72qakOk__Qo>. Retrieved on 2007-12-02.
  21. ^ a b Crisostomo, Isabelo T. (1987), Cory, Profile of a President: The Historic Rise to Power of Corazon ..., p. 226, <http://books.google.com/books?id=iW_ddLowBYkC&pg=PA226&dq=Col.+Antonio+Sotelo+to+camp+crame&sig=8mi_fKwg8Es6GkYyyyuXCd9FPz0>. Retrieved on 2007-12-03.
  22. ^ Maramba, Asuncion David (1987), On the Scene: The Philippine Press Coverage of the 1986 Revolution, Solar Publishing Corp., p. 27, <http://books.google.com/books?id=2QAeAAAAMAAJ&dq=Channel+9+tower+in+1986+revolution&q=Channel+4&pgis=1#search>. Retrieved on 2007-12-03.
  23. ^ Crisostomo, Isabelo T., Cory, Profile of a President: The Historic Rise to Power of Corazon ..., p. 257, <http://books.google.com/books?id=iW_ddLowBYkC&pg=PA257&dq=Cory+Aquino+in+Club+Filipino&sig=cZKEQ46Ff0iiB5BIQkVvBP8Prcw>. Retrieved on 2007-12-03.
  24. ^ a b c d e Ellison, Katherine (2005), Imelda: Steel Butterfly of the Philippines, iUniverse, p. 244, ISBN 0595349226, <http://books.google.com/books?id=Dfl53AtDM0oC&pg=RA1-PA244&dq=Dahil+Sa+sang+by+Imelda+Marcos&sig=SEFcEZr_o3z8yofynWO8l7quWak>. Retrieved on 2007-12-03.
  25. ^ Putzel, James (Spring 1999). "Survival of an imperfect democracy in the Philippines". Democratization 6 (1): 198 - 223. doi:10.1080/13510349908403603. Retrieved on 2007-12-04. 

  • Mercado, Paul Sagmayao, and Tatad, Francisco S. People Power: The Philippine Revolution of 1986: An eyewitness history. Manila, Philippines. The James B. Reuter, S.J., Foundation. 1986.
  • Baron, Cynthia S. and Suazo, Melba M. Nine Letters: The Story of the 1986 Filipino Revolution. Quezon City, Philippines. Gerardo P. Baron Books. 1986
  • Schock, Kurt. Unarmed Insurrections: People Power Movements in Nondemocracies. Minneapolis, USA. University of Minnesota Press. 2005.

Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.