Phonological history of wh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

The hole-whole merger is the replacement of /ʍ/ with /h/ before the vowels /oː/ and /uː/ which occurred in Old English resulting in the following pronunciations:

  • who - /huː/
  • whom - /huːm/
  • whole - /hoːl/
  • whore - /hoːr/

"hole" and "whole" became homophonous.

Wh-labioldentalization is the merger of /ʍ/ and the voiceless labioldental fricative /f/ occurring in the Scots and Māori languages resulting in wh' denoting /f/. In Scots this leads to pronunciations like:

  • whit (what) - /fɪt/
  • when - /fɛn/

Whine and fine become homophonous as /fain/.

The wine-whine merger is a merger by which [ʍ] or sequence /hw/ (spelled wh) becomes /w/; it occurs in the speech of the great majority of English speakers. The resulting /w/ is generally pronounced like the original /w/, but sometimes like the original /ʍ/ or /hw/; this may be due to hypercorrection.

The whine-wine merger in the United States. The area marked in purple is where preservation of the contrast is strongest. In other areas the merger predominates, though sporadic instances of contrast preservation are found throughout the country. Based on [1] and the map at Labov, Ash, and Boberg (2006: 50).
The whine-wine merger in the United States. The area marked in purple is where preservation of the contrast is strongest. In other areas the merger predominates, though sporadic instances of contrast preservation are found throughout the country. Based on [1] and the map at Labov, Ash, and Boberg (2006: 50).[1]

The merger is essentially complete in England, Wales, the West Indies, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa, and is widespread in the United States and Canada. In accents with the merger, pairs like wine/whine, wet/whet, weather/whether, Wales/whales, wear/where, which/witch etc. are homophonous. The merger is not found in Scotland, Ireland (except in the popular speech of Dublin), and parts of the U.S. and Canada. The merger is not usually stigmatized except occasionally by very speech-conscious people.

According to Labov, Ash, and Boberg (2006: 49)[1], while there are regions of the U.S. (particularly in the South and the Midwest) where speakers keeping the distinction are about as numerous as those having the merger, there are no regions where the preservation of the distinction is predominant (see map). Throughout the U.S. and Canada, about 83% of respondents in the survey had the merger completely, while about 17% preserved at least some trace of the distinction.

The wine-whine merger, although apparently present in the south of England as early as the 13th century,[2] did not become acceptable in educated speech until the late 18th century. While some RP speakers still use /ʍ/, most accents of England, Wales, West Indies and the southern hemisphere have only /w/.

Phonologically, the sound of the wh in words like whine in accents without the merger is either analyzed as the consonant cluster /hw/, and it is transcribed so in most dictionaries, or as a single phoneme /ʍ/, due to the fact that phonetically it is realized as the single sound [ʍ].

  1. ^ a b Labov, William; Sharon Ash; Charles Boberg (2006). The Atlas of North American English. Berlin: Mouton-de Gruyter. ISBN 3-11-016746-8. 
  2. ^ Minkova, Donka (2004). "Philology, linguistics, and the history of /hw/~/w/.", in In Anne Curzan and Kimberly Emmons, eds.,: Studies in the History of the English language II: Unfolding Conversations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 7-46. ISBN 3-11-018097-9. 
Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.