Powerful number

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Divisibility-based
sets of integers
Form of factorization:
Prime number
Composite number
Powerful number
Square-free number
Achilles number
Constrained divisor sums:
Perfect number
Almost perfect number
Quasiperfect number
Multiply perfect number
Hyperperfect number
Unitary perfect number
Semiperfect number
Primitive semiperfect number
Practical number
Numbers with many divisors:
Abundant number
Highly abundant number
Superabundant number
Colossally abundant number
Highly composite number
Superior highly composite number
Other:
Deficient number
Weird number
Amicable number
Sociable number
Sublime number
Harmonic divisor number
See also:
Divisor function
Divisor
Prime factor
Factorization

A powerful number is a positive integer m that for every prime number p dividing m, p2 also divides m. Equivalently, a powerful number is the product of a square and a cube, that is, a number m of the form m = a2b3. Powerful numbers are also known as squareful, square-full, or 2-full. Paul Erdős and George Szekeres studied such numbers and Solomon W. Golomb named such numbers powerful.

The following is a list of all powerful numbers between 1 and 1000:

1, 4, 8, 9, 16, 25, 27, 32, 36, 49, 64, 72, 81, 100, 108, 121, 125, 128, 144, 169, 196, 200, 216, 225, 243, 256, 288, 289, 324, 343, 361, 392, 400, 432, 441, 484, 500, 512, 529, 576, 625, 648, 675, 676, 729, 784, 800, 841, 864, 900, 961, 968, 972, 1000. (sequence A001694 in OEIS)

Contents

If m = a2b3, then every prime in the prime factorization of a appears in the prime factorization of m with an exponent of at least two, and every prime in the prime factorization of b appears in the prime factorization of m with an exponent of at least three; therefore, m is powerful.

In the other direction, suppose that m is powerful, with prime factorization

m = \prod p_i^{\alpha_i},

where each αi ≥ 2. Define γi to be three if αi is odd, and zero otherwise, and define βi = αi - γi. Then, all values βi are nonnegative even integers, and all values γi are either zero or three, so

m = (\prod p_i^{\beta_i})(\prod p_i^{\gamma_i}) = (\prod p_i^{\beta_i/2})^2(\prod p_i^{\gamma_i/3})^3

supplies the desired representation of m as a product of a square and a cube.

The representation m = a2b3 calculated in this way has the property that b is squarefree, and is uniquely defined by this property.

The sum of reciprocals of powerful numbers converges to

\prod_p\left(1+\frac{1}{p(p-1)}\right)=\frac{\zeta(2)\zeta(3)}{\zeta(6)} = \frac{315}{2\pi^4}\zeta(3),

where p runs over all primes, ζ(s) denotes Riemann's zeta function, and ζ(3) is Apéry's constant (Golomb, 1970).

Let k(x) denote the number of powerful numbers in the interval [1,x]. Then k(x) is proportional to the square root of x. More precisely,

cx^{1/2}-3x^{1/3}\le k(x) \le cx^{1/2}, c=\zeta(3/2)/\zeta(3)=2.173\cdots

(Golomb, 1970).

The sequence of pairs of consecutive powerful numbers is given by (sequence A060355 in OEIS). The two smallest consecutive powerful numbers are 8 and 9. Since Pell's equation x2 − 8y2 = 1 has infinitely many integral solutions, there are infinitely many pairs of consecutive powerful numbers (Golomb, 1970); more generally, one can find consecutive powerful numbers by solving a similar Pell equation x2 − ny2 = ±1 for any perfect cube n. However, one of the two powerful numbers in a pair formed in this way must be a square. According to Guy, Erdős has asked whether there are infinitely many pairs of consecutive powerful numbers such as (233, 2332132) in which neither number in the pair is a square. It is a conjecture of Erdős, Mollin, and Walsh that there are no three consecutive powerful numbers; if the abc conjecture is true, it would follow that there are only finitely many triples of consecutive powerful numbers.

Any odd number is a difference of two consecutive squares: 2k + 1 = (k + 1)2 - k2. Similarly, any multiple of four is a difference of the squares of two numbers that differ by two. However, a singly even number, that is, a number divisible by two but not by four, cannot be expressed as a difference of squares. This motivates the question of determining which singly even numbers can be expressed as differences of powerful numbers. Golomb exhibited some representations of this type:

2 = 33 − 52
10 = 133 − 37
18 = 192 − 73 = 32(33 − 52).

It had been conjectured that 6 cannot be so represented, and Golomb conjectured that there are infinitely many integers which cannot be represented as a difference between two powerful numbers. However, Narkiewicz showed that 6 can be so represented in infinitely many ways such as

6 = 5473 − 4632,

and McDaniel showed that every integer has infinitely many such representations(McDaniel, 1982).

Erdős conjectured that every sufficiently large integer is a sum of at most three powerful numbers; this was proved by Roger Heath-Brown (1987).

More generally, we can consider the integers all of whose prime factors have exponents at least k. Such an integer is called a k-powerful number, k-ful number, or k-full number.

(2k+1 − 1)k,  2k(2k+1 − 1)k,   (2k+1 − 1)k+1

are k-powerful numbers in an arithmetic progression. Moreover, if a1, a2, ..., as are k-powerful in an arithmetic progression with common difference d, then

a1(as + d)k,  

a2(as + d)k, ..., as(as + d)k, (as + d)k+1

are s + 1 k-powerful numbers in an arithmetic progression.

We have an identity involving k-powerful numbers:

ak(al + ... + 1)k + ak + 1(al + ... + 1)k + ... + ak + l(al + ... + 1)k = ak(al + ... +1)k+1.

This gives infinitely many l+1-tuples of k-powerful numbers whose sum is also k-powerful. Nitaj shows there are infinitely many solutions of x+y=z in relatively prime 3-powerful numbers(Nitaj, 1995). Cohn constructs an infinite family of solutions of x+y=z in relatively prime non-cube 3-powerful numbers as follows: the triplet

X = 9712247684771506604963490444281, Y = 32295800804958334401937923416351, Z = 27474621855216870941749052236511

is a solution of the equation 32X3 + 49Y3 = 81Z3. We can construct another solution by setting X′ = X(49Y3 + 81Z3), Y′ = −Y(32X3 + 81Z3), Z′ = Z(32X3 − 49Y3) and omitting the common divisor.

  • Erdős, Paul and Szekeres, George (1934). "Über die Anzahl der Abelschen Gruppen gegebener Ordnung und über ein verwandtes zahlentheoretisches Problem". Acta Litt. Sci. Szeged 7: 95–102. 
  • Heath-Brown, Roger (1988). "Ternary quadratic forms and sums of three square-full numbers". Séminaire de Théorie des Nombres, Paris, 1986-7: 137–163, Boston: Birkhäuser. 
  • Heath-Brown, Roger (1990). "Sums of three square-full numbers". Number Theory, I (Budapest, 1987): 163–171, Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai, no. 51. 
  • McDaniel, Wayne L. (1982). "Representations of every integer as the difference of powerful numbers". Fibonacci Quarterly 20: 85–87. 
  • Nitaj, Abderrahmane (1995). "On a conjecture of Erdős on 3-powerful numbers". Bull. London Math. Soc. 27: 317–318. 

Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.