Republicanism in Canada

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Canadian republicanism)
Jump to: navigation, search

Canadian republicanism is the advocacy of constitutional change in Canada leading to the abolition of constitutional monarchy within the Commonwealth and the creation of a republic as a Commonwealth republic.

Contents

William Lyon Mackenzie advocated the creation of a "Canadian Republic" during the 1837 Upper Canada Rebellion and, after the defeat of his uprising in Toronto, established a provisional government for the Republic of Canada on Navy Island. The Patriotes Rebellion in Lower Canada is also thought to have been republican in nature. (see also Rebellions of 1837). The British government's Durham Report in the aftermath of the rebellions led to the introduction of responsible government thus quelling republican sentiment by giving settlers in what became the United Province of Canada more rights while retaining British rule and eventually leading to Canadian confederation.

Latent republican sentiment remained a factor in Quebec where Henri Bourassa and other nationalists endorsed English liberalism and liberal imperialism but opposed Tory British imperialism and advocated Canadian independence from the British Empire in response to the Boer War and, later, the Conscription Crisis of 1917 during the First World War. Republican sentiment became more prominent with the rise of the Quebec nationalist movement in the 1960s with the demands for an independent republic of Quebec put forward by both the Front de libération du Québec which advocated violent methods and the parliamentary Quebec indépendantistes who formed the Parti Québécois. Queen Elizabeth's royal visit to Quebec City in 1964 provoked a militant anti-monarchist and Quebec nationalist demonstration which was put down by police with 36 arrests and scores of injuries in what is remembered as samedi de la matraque (truncheon Saturday). Support for the monarchy remains weakest in Quebec to this day.

Simultaneously, the idea of a Canadian republic where the Queen would be replaced by an elected head of state gathered strength in English Canada among those who saw the abandonment of what was seen as the vestiges of colonialism as both a means of stengthening national unity between English and French-Canadians and as a means of asserting Canadian sovereignty and nationhood. The Toronto Star, English Canada's largest circulation daily newspaper first endorsed the creation of a Canadian republic during the Canadian centennial year of 1967, however the publication no longer supports this movement.

In 2007, Charles Roach, a member of Citizens for a Canadian Republic, was given leave by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice to proceed with a class action lawsuit to modify the Oath of Citizenship in order to remove the reference to the Monarch.[1][2] An earlier legal action by former Toronto City Councillor Tony O'Donohue to have the Act of Settlement 1701 ruled unconstitutional, also backed by Citizens for a Canadian Republic, was dismissed by the courts in 2003. Another legal battle by CCR member Pierre L. J. Vincent resulted in civil servants no longer being required to swear an oath to the Queen.

Further information: O'Donohue v. Canada

While the idea of a republic was a minor issue during the Canadian Constitutional negotiations of the 1970s, when a new Constitution was agreed to in 1982 it included a provision requiring unanimous consent of the federal government and all ten provincial governments before any change could be implemented to the status of the monarchy. As a result it is constitutionally more difficult to remove the monarchy in Canada than it is in any other Commonwealth realm including the United Kingdom. However, retired political science professor Edward McWhinney, a constitutional expert and former Member of Parliament, argues in his book The Governor General and the Prime Ministers that Canada could become a republic "quietly and without fanfare by simply failing legally to proclaim any successor to the Queen in relation to Canada." Still, this theory remains unsupported by either the Canadian government or other constitutional scholars.[3]

  1. ^ Brean, Joseph; National Post: Immigrant takes oath of allegiance to court; May 9, 2007]
  2. ^ Gombu, Phinjo; Toronto Star: Lawyer cleared to challenge loyalty oath to the Queen; May 18, 2007
  3. ^ [1]

Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.