Round-robin tournament

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Round robin tournament)
Jump to: navigation, search

A round-robin tournament or all-play-all tournament is a type of group tournament in which each participant plays every other participant an equal number of times. In a single round-robin schedule, each participant plays every other participant once. If each participant plays all others twice, this is frequently called a double round-robin. The term is rarely used when all participants play one another more than twice, and is never used when one participant plays others an unequal number of times (as is the case in all of the major United States professional sports).

The term round-robin is derived from the French term ruban, meaning "ribbon". Over a long period of time, the term was corrupted and idiomized to robin.

In sports with a large number of competitive matches per season, double round-robins are common. Almost all football (soccer) leagues in the world are organized on a double round-robin basis, in which every team plays all others in its league once at home and once away. There are also round-robin chess tournaments; the World Chess Championship was decided in 2005, and will again be decided in 2007, in an eight-player double round-robin tournament, where each player faces every other player once as white and once as black.

Group tournaments rankings usually go by number of matches won and drawn, with any of a variety of tiebreaker criteria.

Frequently, pool stages within a wider tournament are conducted on a round-robin basis. Examples with pure round-robin scheduling include the FIFA World Cup and UEFA Cup (since 200405) in football, the Super 14 of rugby union in the Southern Hemisphere, the Cricket World Cup and many American Football college conferences, such as the Mountain West Conference. The group phase of the UEFA Champions League is contested as a double round-robin, as are most basketball leagues outside the United States, including the regular-season and Top 16 phases of the Euroleague.

Contents

In a round-robin format, the element of luck is seen to be reduced, given that all competitors face the same opponents, and a few bad performances need not cripple a competitor's chances of ultimate victory. In English football, although the FA Cup was founded before the Football League, the (round-robin) League champions have always been regarded as the "best" team in the land, rather than the (knockout) Cup winners.

Disadvantages include the existence of games late in the competition between competitors with no remaining chance of success. Moreover, some later matches will pair one competitor who has something left to play for against another who does not. This asymmetry means that playing the same opponents is not necessarily equitable: the same opponents in a different order may play harder or easier matches. There is also no showcase final match. The ability to recover from defeats, while rewarding overall consistency, may also be seen as a crutch for competitors who lack the temperament to handle the pressure of a knockout tournament.

Further issues arise where a round-robin is used as a qualifying round within a larger tournament. A competitor already qualified for the next stage before its last game may either not try hard (in order to conserve resources for the next phase) or even deliberately lose (if the scheduled next-phase opponent for a lower-placed qualifier is perceived to be easier than for a higher-placed one).

Swiss system tournaments attempt to combine elements of the round-robin and elimination formats, to provide a reliable champion using fewer rounds than a round-robin, while allowing draws and losses.

If n is the number of competitors, a pure round robin tournament requires \begin{matrix} \frac{n}{2} \end{matrix}(n - 1) games. If n is even, then in each of (n − 1) rounds, \begin{matrix} \frac{n}{2} \end{matrix} games can be run in parallel, provided there exist sufficient resources (e.g. courts for a tennis tournament). If n is odd, there will be n rounds with \begin{matrix} \frac{n - 1}{2} \end{matrix} games, and one competitor having no game in that round.

The standard algorithm for round-robins is to assign each competitor a number, and pair them off in the first round …

Round 1. (1 plays 14, 2 plays 13, ... )
 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  
 14 13 12 11 10 9  8

… then fix one competitor (number one in this example) and rotate the others clockwise …

Round 2. (1 plays 13, 14 plays 12, ... )
 1  14 2  3  4  5  6
 13 12 11 10 9  8  7
Round 3. (1 plays 12, 13 plays 11, ... )
 1  13 14 2  3  4  5
 12 11 10 9  8  7  6

… until you end up almost back at the initial position

Round 13. (1 plays 2, 3 plays 14, ... )
 1  3  4  5  6  7  8
 2 14  13 12 11 10 9

If there are an odd number of competitors, a dummy competitor can be added, whose scheduled opponent in a given round does not play and has a bye. The upper and lower rows can indicate home/away in sports, white/black in chess, etc (this must alternate between rounds since competitor 1 is always on the first row). If, say, competitors 3 and 8 were unable to fulfill their fixture in the third round, it would need to be rescheduled outside the other rounds, since both competitors would already be facing other opponents in those rounds. More complex scheduling constraints may require more complex algorithms.

Let us have n competitors, and a scoring system where no ties are permitted. Let si be the number of wins scored by competitor i, and let us order them such that s_1 \le s_2 \le \cdots \le s_n. Thus we define a score vector, (s_1, s_2, \cdots, s_n), satisfying the following three conditions:

  1. 0 \le s_1 \le s_2 \le \cdots \le s_n
  2. s_1 + s_2 + \cdots + s_i \ge {i \choose 2}, \mbox{for }i = 1, 2, \cdots, n - 1
  3. s_1 + s_2 + \cdots + s_n = {n \choose 2}

Let s(n) be the number of different score vectors of size n. The sequence s(n) (sequence A000571 in OEIS) starts as:

1, 1, 1, 2, 4, 9, 22, 59, 167, 490, 1486, 4639, 14805, 48107, ...

It is possible to show that for sufficiently large n:

s(n) > c_1 4^n n^{-{5 \over 2}}

Also:

s(n) < c_2 4^n n^{-{5 \over 2}}

Where: c_1 = 0.049,\,\, c_2 < 4.858.

Together these show that:

s(n) \in \Theta (4^n n^{-{5 \over 2}}).

Here Θ signifies an asymptotically tight bound.

  • Takacs, Lajos (1991). "A Bernoulli Excursion and Its Various Applications". Advances in Applied Probability 23 (3): 557-585. 

  • SCHED link to a DOS program to quickly create round robin schedules
  • Tournament 16 link to a Windows XP program to create round robin schedules and export to HTML.
  • Round Robin Generator link to an online tool to quickly create a round robin schedule, and export to MS Excel.
  • Round Robin Discussion Board link to a discussion community and schedules (balanced,cyclic,first-fit,whist).
Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.