From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Saturn INT-20

INT-20 configuration
Fact sheet
Function	Manned LEO launch vehicle
Manufacturer	Boeing (S-IC) Douglas (S-IVB)
Country of origin	USA
Size
Height	85 m (281 ft)
Diameter	10 m (33 ft)
Mass	2,304,000 kg (5,070,000 lb)
Stages	2
	Capacity
Payload to LEO	max 60,500 kg
Launch History
Status	Proposal
Launch Sites	LC-39, Kennedy Space Center
First Stage - S-IC
Engines	3-5 Rocketdyne F-1
Thrust	max 34.02 MN (max 7,648,000 lbf)
Burn time	212 seconds
Fuel	RP-1/LOX
Second Stage - S-IVB
Engines	1 Rocketdyne J-2
Thrust	1 MN (225,000 lbf)
Burn time	~475 seconds
Fuel	LH2/LOX

The Saturn INT-20 was a proposed intermediate payload follow-on from the Apollo Saturn V launch vehicle. An interstage would be fitted on top of the S-IC stage to support the S-IVB stage, so it could be considered either a souped-up Saturn IB with a more powerful first stage, or a stubby, cut-down Saturn V without the S-II second stage.

Three variants were studied, one with three F-1 engines in the first stage, one with four and one with five.

Without the S-II stage, which made up a large fraction of the mass of the Saturn V, the five-engine variant of the INT-20 would be seriously overpowered and accelerate substantially faster than the Saturn V. To avoid excessive aerodynamic stress in the low atmosphere three engines would be shut down 88 seconds after launch, with the remainder of the first-stage flight flown on only two engines. As a consequence the extra payload over the four-engine variant would only have been about one thousand pounds, and the extra cost and complexity of the fifth engine was unjustified.

The four-engine variant would launch with four engines firing and shut down two engines 146 seconds after launch. The remaining two engines would burn until first-stage shutdown 212 seconds after launch. This variant could put approximately 132,000 pounds into a 100 nautical mile (185 km or 115 statute mile) orbit, versus around 250,000 pounds for the three-stage Saturn V.

The three-engine variant would burn all three engines up to first-stage shutdown at 146 seconds after launch. This variant could put approximately 78,000 pounds of payload into a 100 nautical mile (185 km) orbit, around twice the useful payload of the Saturn IB.

Both three- and four-engine variants would therefore have provided useful payload capacities intermediate between the Saturn IB and Saturn V, and re-using Saturn V components would reduce costs and simplify ground operations compared to building an entirely new launcher in that payload range.

• Final Report - Studies of Improved Saturn V Vehicles and Intermediate Payload Vehicles (PDF format), October 7th 1966
• Saturn INT-20 (Astronautix)

Saturn Family of Launch Vehicles		v • d • e
Early Proposals: Juno V | Saturn A-1 | Saturn A-2 | Saturn B-1
"C" series: Saturn C-1 | Saturn C-2 | Saturn C-3 | Saturn C-4 | Saturn C-5 | Saturn C-5N | Saturn C-8
Saturn 1 series: Saturn I | Saturn IB | Saturn IB-CE | Saturn IB-A | Saturn IB-B | Saturn IB-C | Saturn IB-D | Saturn INT-05 | Saturn INT-11 | Saturn INT-12 | Saturn INT-13 | Saturn INT-14 | Saturn INT-15 | Saturn INT-16 | Saturn INT-27 | Saturn LCB
Saturn II series: Saturn II | Saturn INT-17 | Saturn INT-18 | Saturn INT-19
Saturn V series: Saturn V | Saturn MLV | Saturn V ELV | Saturn INT-20 | Saturn INT-21 | Saturn INT-23 | Saturn INT-24 | Saturn INT-25 | Saturn-Shuttle | Saturn V-3 | Saturn V-A | Saturn V-B | Saturn V-C | Saturn V-D | Saturn V-Centaur | Jarvis