Siege of Tobruk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Battle of Tobruk)
Jump to: navigation, search
Siege of Tobruk
Part of World War II, North African Campaign

Polish Independent Carpathian Brigade's offensive on Derna, November 12, 1941
Date April 10, 1941November 27, 1941
Location Tobruk, Libya
Result Allied victory
Combatants
Flag of Australia Australia
Flag of Czechoslovakia Czechoslovakia
Flag of Poland Poland
Flag of South Africa South Africa
Flag of the United Kingdom United Kingdom
Flag of Germany Germany
Flag of Italy Kingdom of Italy
Commanders
Flag of Australia Leslie Morshead Flag of Germany Erwin Rommel
Strength
14,000 35,000?
Casualties
Allies:
9,009 killed
941 captured
estimated 12,000 total
8,000

The Siege of Tobruk was a lengthy confrontation between Axis and Allied forces, mostly from the Australian 9th Division, in the North African Campaign of World War II. It started on 10 April 1941, when Lieutenant General Erwin Rommel's Afrika Korps attacked the fort, besieging it for 240 days.

Contents

On January 21, 1941, the Australian 6th Division made an assault to capture Tobruk from the Italian garrison, during the Allied Operation Compass, aimed at driving the Italian forces from Libya and Tunisia. It took 12 hours before the Italian commander, General Petassi Manella surrendered himself, but he refused to order the surrender of the town, which meant resistance lasted for a few more hours before the garrison was defeated. Australian casualties were 49 dead and 306 wounded, while the Italian defenders suffered 27,000 POWs.

On 24 March Rommel launched his first offensive with the newly arrived Afrika Korps, and by 10 April reconnaissance elements of the force reached Tobruk, and the roles were reversed, with the Australians being the beleaguered forces.

The Australian commander, Lieutenant General Leslie Morshead divided the 50 kilometre (30 mile) perimeter into three rough sectors. It would be the job of the three Australian brigades to ensure these were not breached. The 26th would hold the western sector, the 20th would hold the south and the 24th would hold the east. The 9th Division was reinforced by the Australian 18th Brigade (detached from the 7th Division) and British artillery units. Morshead also ordered all Italian signal cables to be re-laid. He wanted to know what was happening, and where, so he could adjust his forces accordingly. He also kept a reserve of runners in case the telephone lines were disrupted by the German attack.

At 4:00 AM on April 10, 1941, during one of the most fierce khamsin (sandstorm) in a generation, a patrol from the Australian 2/48th Battalion (9th Division) discovered that they were being trailed by a German panzer. They succeeded in losing the tank before they got back to Tobruk. This alerted the Australian forces to the threat of the coming assault.

The first shots in the defence of Tobruk were fired using captured Italian field guns, by members of the 2/28th Infantry Battalion, who had been given one week's training in the use of artillery. They observed three German armoured cars closing in on their position.

General Heinrich von Prittwitz und Gaffron was near the front line, supervising troops of the German 8th Machine Gun Battalion attacking a slope that led to a destroyed bridge. He made a good target for Australian gunners; he and his driver were among the first casualties and both were killed. The skirmish lasted for three hours until the Germans finally fell back. Australian sappers and engineers hastily laid minefields.

Rommel decided to sweep past Tobruk, cutting the main Bardia Road to Cairo and investing the city. However, because of Allied naval superiority, the Allied troops were never short of supplies, and wounded troops could be ferried out of the city. The siege of the city was done with three Italian Infantry Division and the Italian Ariete Armour Division as well as elements from the 5th Light Division , under General Kircheim, the only German division under Rommel's command.

Just after noon on 11 April 1941, the Germans and Italians positioned themselves for a concentrated attack on the city. To exaggerate the size of their force, they were ordered to make more dust than normal. The 5th Panzer Regiment of the 5th Light Division drew fire first to try to assess the defence. Within an hour, five of the German tanks were destroyed and the others pulled back. At 3:00 PM the men of the 2/13th Battalion saw about 400 German soldiers approach. The Australians defensive fire forced the Germans to retreat, carrying their dead and wounded with them.

At 4:00 PM, a platoon-sized formation from the 2/17th Battalion saw 700 Germans launching an attack on their position. The Australians were outnumbered and outgunned with only two Bren guns, a few dozen rifles and a couple of Boys anti-tank rifles. The Australian artillery opened fire and inflicted significant casualties, but the German soldiers en masse kept advancing. Several groups of Panzers and Italian M13s advanced on the Australians. As the Axis armor closed in, four British tanks arrived, firing over the head of the infantry. The Axis tanks could not hurdle the obstacles set for them and they fell back to regroup. This attack yielded only one dead on the Allied side.

Morshead's defence plan was aggressive. He ordered rigorous patrolling of the anti-tank ditches and more mines laid. The aggressive patrolling appeared to work. The 2/13th Battalion encountered a German raiding party with a large amount of explosives. The party had clearly intended to blow the sides of an anti-tank ditch, allowing easier passage for tanks to cross - but they were forced to retreat.

In cases where panzers and Italian tankettes did reach or pass the Australian lines, the infantry — ensconced in well-built strongpoints, including many installed by the original Italian garrison — simply concentrated on the German or Italian infantry, knowing that the tanks' guns could not be brought to bear on them and the Axis tanks would face anti-tank guns in the second line of defences. On the most important of these attacks on 1 May, a combined Italo-German infantry/armour force attacking, had its armour driven back and the infantry stranded behind Australian lines for quite some time before they could be extracted.

The Australians achieved a notable success in holding off the German offensive. One German POW said: "I cannot understand you Australians. In Poland, France, and Belgium, once the tanks got through the soldiers took it for granted that they were beaten. But you are like demons. The tanks break through and your infantry still keep fighting."[1] Rommel wrote of seeing "a batch of some fifty or sixty Australian prisoners [largely from C Company of the 2/24th Battalion]... marched off close behind us—immensely big and powerful men, who without question represented an elite formation of the British Empire, a fact that was also evident in battle."[1]

Rommel placed the blame for the failure of the attack on Italian units, especially the Trento Infantry Division. However, it was a battalion of German infantry reinforcements who were overwhelmed by British artillery fire on the morning of 1 May and had refused to attack the breached defences of the Australian 2/24th Battalion. The 5th Panzer regimental commander, Colonel Olbrich, had also inexplicably ordered his supporting tank battalion to withdraw on this occasion. It was a battalion of the Trento Division, according to the authors Jentz and Serle, who pressed home their attack and captured about 50 Australian prisoners. While the Germans retreated, it was left to the Italian infantry to try and deal with the Australian countermeasures, allowing the trapped machine-gunners of Lieutenant-Colonel Ponath's 8th Machine-Gun Battalion to withdraw. (Jentz, and Serle’s “2/24th: A History of the 2/24 Australian Infantry Battalion”)[citation needed]

Rommel was impressed by the conduct of the defenders. The heavy losses incurred by the attackers led the commanders of the Italian divisions and the German 5th Light Division to argue against further attacks until better preparations could be made. Rommel decided to hold off further major attacks until the end of November 1941, awaiting the arrival of more German forces and allowing more training of his forces in the art of siege warfare.

Two attempts were made before the siege was successfully lifted by allied troops:

For much of the siege, Tobruk was defended by the 9th Division under Morshead. General Archibald Wavell instructed Morshead to hold the fortress for eight weeks, but the 9th Division held it for over five months, before being gradually withdrawn during September and replaced by the British 70th Infantry Division, the Polish Carpathian Brigade and Czechoslovak 11th Infantry Battalion (East). The Royal Navy also played an important role in Tobruk's defense, providing gunfire support, supplies, fresh troops and ferrying out the wounded.

Tobruk was the longest siege in British Imperial military history, and was the first notable defeat for the Africa Corps. Rommel nonetheless captured Tobruk in a new offensive in 1942 in the Battle of Gazala. Among the prisoners were the main body of the South African 2nd Division.

  1. ^ a b Miller (1986)
Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.