Snopes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Barbara Mikkelson)
Jump to: navigation, search
Urban Legends Reference Pages (snopes.com)
Snopes logo
URL http://www.snopes.com/
Commercial? Supported by advertisements on pages and contributions from readers
Type of site Reference pages
Registration Required only on forums
Owner Barbara and David P. Mikkelson
Created by Barbara and David P. Mikkelson

Snopes (pronounced /ˈsnoʊps/) also known as the Urban Legends Reference Pages, is a website that is the most widely-known resource for validating or debunking urban legends, Internet rumors, email forwards, and other such stories of uncertain or questionable origin in popular American culture.[1] Snopes is run by Barbara and David Mikkelson, a couple from California who married after meeting on the newsgroup alt.folklore.urban. The couple also founded the San Fernando Valley Folklore Society, who were credited as the owners of the site until 2005.[2] The site is organized according to topic and includes a messageboard where questionable stories and pictures may be posted.

Contents

David Mikkelson used the username "snopes" (the name of a family of often unpleasant people in the works of William Faulkner)[3][4] in the Usenet newsgroup alt.folklore.urban.[5] Barbara Hamel was also a prolific poster. She now works on the site full-time, while David, a programmer, works on the site part-time.[4][6] The Mikkelsons created snopes.com in 1995.[6]

Snopes aims to debunk or confirm widely spread urban legends. The site is often referenced by news media and other sites, including CNN,[7] FOX news,[8] and MSNBC.[9] The site is so comprehensive that leading folklorist Jan Harold Brunvand has cited it as a reason why he has never created a website of his own.[6]

Snopes directs people to more information about various hoaxes, especially in regard to chain e-mails. Although they research their topics heavily and provide references when possible, not all of their sources (especially those which are personal interviews, phone calls, or e-mails) are fully verifiable. Where appropriate, pages are generally marked "undetermined" or "unverifiable" if the Mikkelsons feel there is not enough evidence to either support or disprove a given claim.

The site is sometimes confused with The AFU and Urban Legends Archive,[10] a similar site run by the denizens of alt.folklore.urban, which houses that newsgroup's FAQ.

The Mikkelsons have stressed the reference portion of the name Urban Legends Reference Pages, indicating that their intention is not merely to dismiss or confirm misconceptions and rumors but to provide evidence for such debunkings and confirmations as well.[11] In an attempt to demonstrate the perils of over-reliance on authority, the Mikkelsons created a series of made-up urban folklore tales which they termed The Repository of Lost Legends.[12] (The name was chosen for its acronym, T.R.O.L.L., a reference to the early 1990s definition of the word "troll" to mean an Internet prank, of which David Mikkelson was a prominent practitioner.[5]) One fictional legend averred that the children's nursery rhyme "Sing a Song of Sixpence" was really a coded reference used by pirates to recruit members. (This parodied a real false legend surrounding "Ring a Ring o' Roses"'s link to the bubonic plague.) Although the creators were sure that no one could believe a tale so ridiculous — and had added a link[13] at the bottom of the page to another page explaining the hoax, and a message with the ratings saying "Note: Any relationship between these ratings and reality is purely coincidental." — eventually the legend was featured as true on an urban legends board-game and TV show.[14] Whether this meant their plan backfired or succeeded is a matter of opinion.

A pilot based on the website called Snopes: Urban Legends was completed with Jim Davidson as host, but major networks passed on the project.[4]

  1. ^ Neil Henry, American Carnival: Journalism Under Siege in an Age of New Media (University of California Press 2007) at 285.
  2. ^ Messageboard post. snopes.com.
  3. ^ Urban Legends Reference Pages: (Frequently Asked Questions). snopes.com. Retrieved on 2006-06-09. “What are 'snopes'?”
  4. ^ a b c Paul Bond (2002-09-07). Web site separates fact from urban legend. San Francisco Chronicle.
  5. ^ a b See Michele Tepper, "Usenet Communities and the Cultural Politics of Information" in David Porter, ed., Internet Culture (1997) at 48 ("[T]he two most notorious trollers in AFU, Ted Frank and snopes, are also two of the most consistent posters of serious research.").
  6. ^ a b c Cathy Seipp (2004-07-21). Where Urban Legends Fall. National Review Online.
  7. ^ http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/10/03/rec.false.rumors/index.html
  8. ^ http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,226223,00.html
  9. ^ http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17798063/
  10. ^ http://www.tafkac.org/
  11. ^ "Urban Legends Reference Pages: (Frequently Asked Questions)". (Re "How do I know the information you've presented is accurate?") Retrieved June 9, 2006.
  12. ^ "Urban Legends Reference Page: Lost Legends". Retrieved 9 June 2006.
  13. ^ "Urban Legends Reference Page: Lost Legends (False Authority)". Retrieved 9 June 2006.
  14. ^ "Urban Legends Reference Pages: Humor (Mostly True Stories)". Retrieved 20 June 2006.

Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.