Stanley v. Georgia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stanley v. Georgia
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued January 14 – 15, 1969
Decided April 7, 1969
Full case name: Stanley v. Georgia
Citations: 394 U.S. 557; 89 S. Ct. 1243; 22 L. Ed. 2d 542; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 1972
Prior history: Defendant convicted; conviction affirmed, Supreme Court of Georgia, 224 Ga. 259, 161 S. E. 2d 309; certiorari granted, 393 U.S. 819
Subsequent history: Conviction reversed
Holding
The State may not prohibit mere possession of obscene matter on the ground that it may lead to antisocial conduct, or proscribe such possession on the ground that it is a necessary incident to a statutory scheme prohibiting distribution
Court membership
Chief Justice: Earl Warren
Associate Justices: Hugo Black, William O. Douglas, John Marshall Harlan II, William J. Brennan, Potter Stewart, Byron White, Abe Fortas, Thurgood Marshall
Case opinions
Majority by: Marshall
Joined by: unanimous
Concurrence by: Black
Concurrence by: Stewart
Joined by: Brennan, White
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amends. I, XIV

Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969), was a United States Supreme Court decision that helped to establish a personal "right to privacy" in U.S. law.

The Georgia home of Robert Eli Stanley, a suspected and previously-convicted bookmaker, was searched by police with a federal warrant to seize betting paraphernalia. They found none, but instead seized three reels of pornographic material from a desk drawer in an upstairs bedroom, and later charged Mr. Stanley with the possession of obscene materials, a crime under Georgia law. This conviction was upheld by the Supreme Court of Georgia.

The Court unanimously overturned the earlier decision and invalidated all state laws that forbid the private possession of materials judged obscene, on the grounds of the 1st and 14th Amendments. Justices Stewart, Brennan, and White, contributed a joint concurring opinion. Justice Hugo Black also concurred, with a separate opinion.

This article related to a U.S. Supreme Court case is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.