Tanaka Memorial

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Tanaka Memorial is allegedly a Japanese war planning document from 1927, in which Prime Minister Tanaka Giichi supposedly laid out for the Emperor of Japan Hirohito the strategy to take over the world. Its authenticity is still a matter of dispute, although in the broad strokes, the strategy was followed by Japan during the Sino-Japanese War and World War II. Its strategy may be summarized by the lines (which do not appear literally in the document):

"Tanaka Memorial", New York, Chinese Student Patriotic Association of America, probably published between 1938-1941.
"Tanaka Memorial", New York, Chinese Student Patriotic Association of America, probably published between 1938-1941.

In order to take over the world, you need to take over China;
In order to take over China, you need to take over Manchuria (Northeastern China) and Mongolia.
If we succeed in conquering China, the rest of the Asiatic countries and the South Sea countries will fear us and surrender to us.
Then the world will realize that Eastern Asia is ours.

It was depicted by United States wartime propaganda as a sort of Japanese answer to Mein Kampf. The Battle of China, one of Frank Capra's movie series Why We Fight (given the Academy Award as a documentary), describes the Tanaka Memorial as the document that was the Japanese plan for war with the United States.

As presented in Battle of China, the four sequential steps to achieve Japan's goal of conquests are

  1. Conquest of Manchuria (North-eastern China)
  2. Conquest of China
  3. Establishment of bases in the Pacific
  4. Conquest of the United States

Even though it is now widely regarded as a fake, the memorial was believed as real in the 1930s and 40s because Japan's actions appeared to correspond to these plans. Actions such as the 1931 invasion of Manchuria, 1937 invasion of China, and the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor and the subsequent Pacific War seemed to confirm this suspicion.[1]

Contents

When the Allies searched for documents following the war, they did not find the Tanaka Memorial among them. Most academic historians regard the Memorial as a forgery and rank it somewhere between the Zinoviev letter and The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.[citation needed]

The origin of the memorial is still unknown. However, the Japanese government obtained information as early as 1929 that Chinese representatives were trying to submit a document relating to Japanese foreign policy, attributed to Tanaka, to the third meeting of Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR)[citation needed]. Upon close examination of the document, which was written in Chinese, it was revealed that the document contained a number of factual errors. For example, the memorial mentioned Yamagata Aritomo attending negotiations of the Nine Power Treaty. But he was already dead by the time that the meeting had taken place. There are numerous errors, some of which involve the career of Tanaka himself, including his trips to Europe and North America. The Japanese representative under direction of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs intended to expose the document as a forgery at the IPR. However, the Chinese representative refrained from submitting the memorial. This is the first mention of the Tanaka Memorial in official records.

The document gained its first publicity when it was published in the 1929, December edition of China Critic (Current Affair Monthly, 時事月報) in Nanking, a Nationalist Chinese publication. The English translation of this document was in circulation before February 1934, because it formed the foundation of the lead article on the front page of the first edition of The Plain Truth magazine published by Herbert W. Armstrong in February of that year. (See [1].) From the 1960s onwards, Armstrong referenced this same article in his autobiography and he did not disavow it, even though, in his book, he claims that he became friends with members of the Japanese Diet (including Prime Ministers) and established a relationship with the brother of Hirohito.

Because the initial edition of the memorial was in Chinese, the forgery is attributed to Chinese sources. However, there have been claims of forgery by the Soviet Union to encourage war between China and Japan, and so to advance Soviet interests. Some internal evidence, however, for example a reference to conspiring with Russia against Japan, does argue against its being Soviet propaganda.

School textbooks in China still mention the Memorial, without stating the document to be a forgery.[citation needed]

  1. ^ Coble, Parks M. Facing Japan: Chinese politics and Japanese imperialism, 1931-1937 page 36. Harvard University Press, 1991. ISBN 0674775309

These sources deny the authenticity of the Memorial:

These sources accept the authenticity of the Memorial:

Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.