Unified Modeling Language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from UML diagram)
Jump to: navigation, search

In the field of software engineering, the Unified Modeling Language (UML) is a standardized specification language for object modeling. UML is a general-purpose modeling language that includes a graphical notation used to create an abstract model of a system, referred to as a UML model.

Contents

UML is officially defined at the Object Management Group (OMG) by the UML metamodel, a Meta-Object Facility metamodel (MOF). Like other MOF-based specifications, the UML metamodel and UML models may be serialized in XMI. UML was designed to specify, visualize, construct, and document software-intensive systems.

UML is not restricted to modeling software. UML is also used for business process modeling, systems engineering modeling, and representing organizational structures. The Systems Modeling Language (SysML) is a Domain-Specific Modeling language for systems engineering that is defined as a UML 2.0 profile.

UML has been a catalyst for the evolution of model-driven technologies, which include model-driven development (MDD), model-driven engineering (MDE), and model-driven architecture (MDA). By establishing an industry consensus on a graphic notation to represent common concepts like classes, components, generalization, aggregation, and behaviors, UML has allowed software developers to concentrate more on design and architecture.

UML models may be automatically transformed to other representations (e.g. Java) by means of QVT-like transformation languages, supported by the OMG.

UML is extensible, offering the following mechanisms for customization: profiles and stereotype. The semantics of extension by profiles have been improved with the UML 2.0 major revision.

After Rational Software Corporation hired James Rumbaugh from General Electric in 1994, the company became the source for the two most popular object-oriented modeling approaches of the day: Rumbaugh's OMT, which was better for object-oriented analysis (OOA), and Grady Booch's Booch method, which was better for object-oriented design (OOD). Together Rumbaugh and Booch attempted to reconcile their two approaches and started work on a Unified Method.

They were soon assisted in their efforts by Ivar Jacobson, the creator of the OOSE method. Jacobson joined Rational in 1995, after his company, Objectory, was acquired by Rational. The three methodologists were collectively referred to as the Three Amigos, since they were well known to argue frequently with each other regarding methodological preferences.

In 1996 Rational concluded that the abundance of modeling languages was slowing the adoption of object technology, so repositioning the work on a Unified Method, they tasked the Three Amigos with the development of a non-proprietary Unified Modeling Language. Representatives of competing Object Technology companies were consulted during OOPSLA '96, and were won over by Rumbaugh's a cappella rendition of his version of Joni Mitchell's "Clouds",[citation needed] indicating the victory of his OMT notation of using boxes for representing classes over Grady Booch's Booch method's notation, which used cloud symbols.

Under the technical leadership of the Three Amigos, an international consortium called the UML Partners was organized in 1996 to complete the Unified Modeling Language (UML) specification, and propose it as a response to the OMG RFP. The UML Partners' UML 1.0 specification draft was proposed to the OMG in January 1997. During the same month the UML Partners formed a Semantics Task Force, chaired by Cris Kobryn and administered by Ed Eykholt, to finalize the semantics of the specification and integrate it with other standardization efforts. The result of this work, UML 1.1, was submitted to the OMG in August 1997 and adopted by the OMG in November 1997.[1]

As a modeling notation, the influence of the OMT notation dominates (e.g., using rectangles for classes and objects). Though the Booch "cloud" notation was dropped, the Booch capability to specify lower-level design detail was embraced. The use case notation from Objectory and the component notation from Booch were integrated with the rest of the notation, but the semantic integration was relatively weak in UML 1.1, and was not really fixed until the UML 2.0 major revision.

Concepts from many other OO methods were also loosely integrated with UML with the intent that UML would support all OO methods. For example CRC Cards (circa 1989 from Kent Beck and Ward Cunningham), and OORam were retained. Many others contributed too with their approaches flavoring the many models of the day including: Tony Wasserman and Peter Pircher with the "Object-Oriented Structured Design (OOSD)" notation (not a method), Ray Buhr's "Systems Design with Ada", Archie Bowen's use case and timing analysis, Paul Ward's data analysis and David Harel's "Statecharts". as the group tried to ensure broad coverage in the real-time systems domain. As a result, UML is useful in a variety of engineering problems, from single process, single user applications to concurrent, distributed systems, making UML rich but large.

The Unified Modeling Language is an international standard:

ISO/IEC 19501:2005 Information technology — Open Distributed Processing — Unified Modeling Language (UML) Version 1.4.2.

UML has matured significantly since UML 1.1. Several minor revisions (UML 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5) fixed shortcomings and bugs with the first version of UML, followed by the UML 2.0 major revision, which is the current OMG standard.

The first part of UML 2.0, the Superstructure which describes the new diagrams and modeling elements available, was adopted by the OMG in October 2004. Other parts of UML 2, notably the infrastructure, the Object Constraint Language (OCL) and the diagram interchange were yet to be completed and ratified as of November 2005.

The final UML 2.0 specification has been declared available and has been added to OMG's formal specification library. The other parts of the UML specification, the UML 2.0 infrastructure, the UML 2.0 Diagram Interchange, and UML 2.0 OCL specifications have been adopted.

The current version available is 2.1.1 (August 2007) and is available in the form of an XMI 2.1 version of the UML 2.1 version. The corresponding XMI 2.1 file is made available from the OMG. The version 2.2 is currently under development.

Most of the commercially successful UML tools now support most of UML 2.0, leaving only the rarely used features left to implement. Of course, it will take some time for the tools that are in the hands of the developers to reach this level of compliance.

UML is not a method by itself; however, it was designed to be compatible with the leading object-oriented software development methods of its time (for example OMT, Booch, Objectory). Since UML has evolved, some of these methods have been recast to take advantage of the new notation (for example OMT), and new methods have been created based on UML. The best known is Rational Unified Process (RUP). There are many other UML-based methods like Abstraction Method, Dynamic Systems Development Method, and others, designed to provide more specific solutions, or achieve different objectives.

It is very important to distinguish between the UML model and the set of diagrams of a system. A diagram is a partial graphical representation of a system's model. The model also contains a "semantic backplane" — documentation such as written use cases that drive the model elements and diagrams.

UML diagrams represent three different views of a system model:

Functional requirements view

Emphasizes the functional requirements of the system from the user's point of view.
Includes use case diagrams.

Static structural view

Emphasizes the static structure of the system using objects, attributes, operations, and relationships.
Includes class diagrams and composite structure diagrams.

Dynamic behavior view

Emphasizes the dynamic behavior of the system by showing collaborations among objects and changes to the internal states of objects.
Includes sequence diagrams, activity diagrams and state machine diagrams.

UML models can be exchanged among UML tools by using the XMI interchange format.

In UML 2.0 there are 13 types of diagrams. To understand them, it can be useful to categorize them hierarchically, as shown in the hierarchy chart below.
Hierarchy of UML 2.0 Diagrams, shown as a class diagram
Structure diagrams emphasize what things must be in the system being modeled:

Behavior diagrams emphasize what must happen in the system being modeled:

Interaction diagrams, a subset of behavior diagrams, emphasize the flow of control and data among the things in the system being modeled:

The Protocol State Machine is a sub-variant of the State Machine. It may be used to model network communication protocols.

UML does not restrict UML element types to a certain diagram type. In general, every UML element may appear on almost all types of diagrams. This flexibility has been partially restricted in UML 2.0.

In keeping with the tradition of engineering drawings, a comment or note explaining usage, constraint, or intent is always allowed in a UML diagram.

UML uses many concepts from many sources. For a definitive list, consult the glossary of Unified Modeling Language terms. Notable concepts are listed here.

For structure

Actor, attribute, class, component, interface, object, package.

For behavior

Activity, event, message, method, operation, state, use case.

For relationships

Aggregation, association, composition, dependency, generalization (or inheritance).

Other concepts

Although UML is a widely recognized and used modeling standard, it is frequently criticized for the following deficiencies:

  • Language bloat. UML is often criticized[2] as being gratuitously large and complex. It contains many diagrams and constructs that are redundant or infrequently used. This criticism is more frequently directed at UML 2.0 than UML 1.0, since newer revisions include more design-by-committee compromises.
  • Problems in learning and adopting. The problems cited above make learning and adopting UML problematic, especially when management forces UML upon engineers lacking the prerequisite skills.[3]
  • Only the code is in sync with the code. Another perspective holds that it is working systems that are important, not beautiful models. As Jack Reeves succinctly put it, "The code is the design."[4][5] Pursuing this notion leads to the need for better ways of writing software; UML has value in approaches that compile the models to generate source or executable code. This however, may still not be sufficient since it is not clear that UML 2.0's Action Semantics exhibit Turing completeness.
  • Cumulative Impedance/Impedance mismatch. As with any notational system, UML is able to represent some systems more concisely or efficiently than others. Thus a developer gravitates toward solutions that reside at the intersection of the capabilities of UML and the implementation language. This problem is particularly pronounced if the implementation language does not adhere to orthodox object-oriented doctrine, as the intersection set between UML and implementation language may be that much smaller.
  • Aesthetically inconsistent. This argument states that the adhoc mixing of abstract notation (2-D ovals, boxes), stick figures and 3-D elements make UML appear jarring. More effort could have been made to construct a uniform and aesthetically pleasing representations.
  • Tries to be all things to all people. UML is a general purpose modeling language, which tries to achieve compatibility with every possible implementation language. In the context of a specific project, the most applicable features of UML must be delimited for use by the design team to accomplish the specific goal. Additionally, the means of restricting the scope of UML to a particular domain is through a formalism that is not completely formed, and is itself the subject of criticism.

"UML: The Positive Spin", a stringent criticism of UML in the form of a parody -- a mock paper by a student who has been assigned UML as a topic and is desperately trying to find something good to say about it -- was published by Bertrand Meyer in Ed Yourdon's American Programmer magazine. It is available on Eiffel Software's archive site[2].

A paper by Brian Henderson-Sellers at the MoDELS/UML conference in Genova, Italy, October 2006 details flaws in the definition of the UML 2.0 language.

  1. ^ UML Specification v. 1.1 (OMG document ad/97-08-11)
  2. ^ a b Bertrand Meyer: UML: The Positive Spin, in American Programmer, 1997, available here
  3. ^ See the ACM article "Death by UML Fever" for an amusing account of such issues.
  4. ^ http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/01/2112257
  5. ^ Code as Design: Three Essays by Jack W. Reeves

  • Penker, Magnus; Hans-Erik Eriksson (2000). Business Modeling with UML. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-29551-5. 
  • Henderson Sellers, Brian (2006). about UML profiles. Springer Verlag. MoDELS'2006 Conference, Genova. 


This article was originally based on material from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing, which is licensed under the GFDL.


Unified Modeling Language (UML) (category) ( view • talk • edit )
Background

Organizations: Object Management Group (OMG) • UML Partners

Persons: Grady Booch • Ivar Jacobson • James Rumbaugh 
Concepts

Object oriented: programming (OOP) • analysis and design (OOAD)

Structure: Actor • Attribute • Class • Component • Interface • Object • Package 

Behavior: Activity • Event • Message • Method • Operation • State • Use case 

Relationships: Aggregation • Association • Composition • Dependency • Generalization (or Inheritance) 

Extensibility: Profile • Constraint • Stereotype • Tagged values 

Other concepts: Multiplicity • Role 
Diagrams

Structure diagrams
Class diagram • Component diagram • Composite structure diagram • Deployment diagram • Object diagram • Package diagram 

Behavior diagrams
Activity diagram • State Machine diagram • Use case diagram • Communication diagram • Interaction overview diagram • Sequence diagram • Timing diagram 
Topics

Compared to relational database model (ERD) • Glossary of UML terms • Systems Modeling Language (SysML) • UML colors:
Role Moment, Interval Description Party, place, thing
Tools(category) and Processes

List of UML tools • Rational Unified Process (RUP)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Modeling_Language"
Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.