Wikipedia:Cleanup

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
 This category is used for administration of the Wikipedia project, and is not part of the encyclopedia. It contains pages which are not articles, or lists articles by status, rather than content.
Shortcuts:
WP:CU
WP:CLEAN
WP:CLEANUP
WP:QUALITY


"WP:CU" redirects here. For Check User Requests, see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser (WP:RCU). For information on changing your username, see Wikipedia:Changing username (WP:CHU). For Cleanup Templates, see Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup (WP:TC).

Welcome to the Wikipedia Cleanup project. This project is intended as a resource for Wikipedia Cleanup information and discussion. Cleanup issues that this project covers may include wikification, spelling, grammar, tone, and sourcing.

Lists of pages requiring cleanup are automatically generated from the {{cleanup}} banners placed on articles. See Category:All pages needing cleanup and Category:Cleanup by month. Older articles with issues that have not been dealt with in some time may be found at Wikipedia:BACKLOG.

Resources for maintenance and collaboration
 v • d • e 
Cleanup General - By topic - Copy to Wiktionary - Notability Sorting - English grammar - Copyediting - Spam - Cleanup Taskforce - Wikify an article - Deorphan an article - Update an article
Categories General cleanup - Articles to be categorized - Underpopulated - Undercategorized categories
Create an article Most wanted - Requests 1 year+ - Requested articles - Short pages - Missing encyclopedic topics - Review anonymous article submissions
Referencing Fact-check - Articles lacking sources - Need more references - Original research
Stubs Advice - Stubs by topic - Most wanted - Short pages - Incomplete lists
Deletion Speedy - Articles - Categories - Redirects - Templates - Misc. pages - Stub templates and categories - Log - Discussion archives - Review
Polishing Expand an article - Peer review - Featured candidates - Fill a topic list
Translation into English Wikipedia:Translation - Existing pages - Spanish trans. of the week - Interwiki link checker
Images Requested pictures - Images for cleanup - Caption review - Images with missing articles
Controversy Neutrality - Article accuracy - Statement accuracy
To-do lists Articles - Projects - Books
Disambiguation Disambiguation - Manual of Style Disambiguation - Hatnotes - Templates
More Active wiki fixup projects - Open tasks - Articles to merge - Articles to split - Copyright violations - Requests - Backlogs - Expert request sorting - Missing names

All users are welcome to help in editing or fixing any page on these lists. Please remember to take the appropriate tag(s) off the page when you have completed cleaning an article. Please also document what you have done on the article's talk page for the reference of other editors.

Information on the cleanup process may be found at Wikipedia:Cleanup process. Other resources may be found at Wikipedia: Cleanup resources and Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup, for help on posting problems with wikipedia pages, or for you to use as a guide.

As of 08:32, 28 May 2008 (UTC), 32,036 articles were tagged for cleanup, or 1.34% of the English Wikipedia's 2,390,485 articles.

Contents

[edit] Related Cleanup Pages

General Cleanup Lists:

Specific Issue Cleanup Lists:

Other Wikipedia:Cleanup related projects include:

[edit] Volunteer to help Wikipedia:Cleanup

Due to the massive backlog of listings that have ballooned the Wikipedia:Cleanup lists to include thousands of articles, Wikipedia:Cleanup needs your help!

Feel free to add your name to the list of volunteers who are actively involved in this project! Adding your name will allow other editors to know that you are actively involved in this project as well as allow for better co-ordination between cleanup editors.

[edit] The Wikipedia Cleanup Legacy List

The manually maintained lists on this page (below) have to an extent been superseded by category lists that are automatically generated from the {{cleanup}} banners placed on articles. See Category:All pages needing cleanup and Category:Cleanup by month.

You may add cleanup requests here as well if you wish (though it is not necessary); see Wikipedia:Cleanup process for further information. Please only add articles to this list that are unlikely to be fixed without the help of Wikipedia cleanup volunteers. Editors are STRONGLY encouraged to try and perform clean-up themselves before posting articles to this list. Help in cleaning articles on this list is also greatly appreciated.

Please keep in mind that the lists here constitute only a small fraction of the Wikipedia articles tagged as needing cleanup, and they may not always be maintained as new articles are tagged or old articles are fixed. The list is still active through a number of editors who do still regularly try to attend to this list. Assistance and participation of other editors is welcome.

You may report confusing/messy articles below and explain why they need to be cleaned-up (grammar, spelling, formatting, order, copyright issues, confusion, etc.). Be sure to cross post your entry on the article's own discussion page for the references of other editors who may not visit this page. Please do not add articles below simply because they are POV or are lacking sources. Make sure to sign your additions with the following format: --~~~~.

[edit] 2008

[edit] August

  • Treasury, The Treasury and The Treasury (disambiguation). Some rearrangement/merging/repartitioning of entries needed. Jackiespeel (talk) 15:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Server (computing) - Confusing definition of the term, followed by other several disorderly definitions as the bulk of the article. There has to be a more encyclopedic way to present the subject. Kreachure (talk) 23:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
    • Upon review of the article, it is suggested that an authority on the subject replace the list of unneeded "Definitions of terms" and replace it with a history of the use of servers.
  • Vasileios Spanoulis Page has been hijacked many many times by Spanoulis' fans and i couldn't keep up with all the edits. It has turned into some kind of fanpage.Plus it contains many useless information and details.Page is also very long Lacks NPOV too. Just to tell you that i had to removed links to videos in youtube one of which was called "Vassilis Spanoulis is better than Ricky Rubio and Rudy Fernandez". Sergiogr ([[User

talk:Sergiogr|talk]]) 11:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Scholastic News Kids Press corp. Needs serious improvement.--Master of Pies (talk) 22:07, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Carlo Pavesi he died. See other wikipedias --Jodo (talk) 21:31, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
  • List of disaster films Contains many films which fall outside of this category. List seems to be a list of all films which contain disasters (using a very broad definition) rather than read as a list of films from the Disaster film genre. Needs much editing. Deckchair (talk) 15:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Dominic_Carter Article reads like promotion material for Carter's book and career.
  • Paul Green - Musician/Songwriter numerous issues. Listed here as article creator has been removing cleanup tags but article remains in very unencyclopedic form.
  • Wacky Races -intermittent POV-pushing and little sourcing
  • Alphabets derived from the Latin needs to be reorganized, to be brief. I have discussed other details on the talk page. -Nameneko (talk) 02:21, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • WPYA - Needs a quick fact checking as the text seems convoluted. The station really had that many callsign changes? --Lendorien (talk) 16:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
  • The Football Factory (film) - Requires major re-write of the "Plot summary" section, which currently has poor grammar and punctuation, and incomplete/fragment sentences --Nitroblu (talk) 17:47, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
    • Cleaned up the grammar a little bit, still needs more references. SOL Basic 00:26, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Folk high school - The article -- particularly the section on France -- still needs quite a bit of sourcing. Also needs to be fact checked and possibly some text editing for normalization. --Lendorien (talk) 16:46, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Ashutosh Tewari - Has GAN potential but needs to have more specific information regarding the link between robotic surgery and the subject of the article.--Nishant M (talk) 10:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Nishant M
  • Miss Nepal 2007 -- several issues. Edited mainly by people who do not have English as their first language. I think. Kaiwhakahaere (talk)

[edit] July

  • Anton Abele, a little help with organising the references.
    • Have changed the format of the references so they are now in order and relate to the article text. Have also made various style and grammar and spelling alterations to the text. The article could do with some more references.IrishPete (talk) 19:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Vazhithala, needs to be written more clearly with some geographic context and needs wikification
    • Cleaned up grammar, trimmed down unneeded info, added stub tag still in need of a picture and political stats etc Royall (talk) 14:3619 August 2008
  • Photoanimation This article about Ken Burns Effect-ish processes needs major reworking. TMC1221 (talk)
  • Taiyuan Cites no references. I corrected some grammar errors, but I'm sure there's stil much to be done. I think that the intro should be expanded, as well. IceUnshattered (talk)
  • West View Park has no references, needs to be wikified, and definitely needs copy editing. --Ultima Designs (talk) 01:18, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Science and technology in Canada - the second biggest article on wikipedia. --Allemandtando (talk) 17:42, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Nuevo Estadio Azul has no references, it's uncategorized, and is using bad grammar. Erik93 (talk) 04:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Big Stick Diplomacy It's high importance, and not much larger than a couple paragraphs. I've already started, but it could use some outside help. Leonard(Bloom) 21:25, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Academic disciplines is in some major need of revisions. Both in terms of the current bullet format which is making additions to various sections unsymmetrical, as well as major content issues. Currently there are few cited sources, and disciplines of all stripes are being added - including those that do not even have a wiki article. OpusDiabolus (talk) 11:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Stereotype needs dire work overall, drastically lacking citations, organization, POV, balance of information, and conciseness. Concentrates too much on ethnical discrimination rather than the overall topic itself. Recommended into splitting types of discrimination into sub-articles. Zanibas (talk) 07:35, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
  • The article on The Mars Volta has sections (especially those on their various albums) that are a real mess. There are multiple references to dates with no year given; grammar is often horrible; references are most often lacking. Perhaps someone with an overall knowledge of the band's oeuvre might be able to do some work on it. --StavinChain (talk) 11:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June

[edit] May

  • Persepolis - Reads like written by someone who has English as a second language. Needs grammer checking. Lacks sources. Listed since 2006. --Lendorien (talk) 16:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Notting Hill - Seems ok, but refs are a mess and not in proper citation format. --Lendorien (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Rhyming slang could use a good re-write, also some copyediting, grammatical fixes, and general cleanup. Cheers, --Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 23:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC).
  • Web crawler - Uses several different forms of citation. Needs to be unified into one style. --Lendorien (talk) 01:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
  • John_L._Merkt I am unfamiliar with particular editing functions and would appreciate assistance in cleaning the article. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Chicken 65 The article has been edited and counter-edited by people wanting to lay claim to it's legacy or something.. and one of the references quote is a blogspot.com post.. extremely irrelevant blog.. the dish however is not.. please ask me for help if needed.. in my opinion the whole article should be flushed.. made bare.--Bijun (talk) 17:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Tremulous The article is written a lot like a game guide, and needs more sources. ۩ Dracion ۩ ✎ ✉ 11:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Foreign Office There is a link-loop on the title of the FCO's predecessor.
Can this page be divided up - it is 128 k long (it appears). Jackiespeel (talk) 17:21, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April

  • Rainbow Boys The Character Summary needs to be edited for grammar and style; it may be easier to entirely rewrite the section with new descriptions. --75.111.175.177 (talk) 23:07, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
  • James Lowther, 1st Viscount Ullswater The conference links have ceased operating - probably other links to the given site need checking. Jackiespeel (talk) 17:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Education in Bulgaria - It needs to be more organized and wikified. Splee (talk) 10:02, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Benina International Airport - The section on the new airport sounds like an advert/news article. It needs to be cleaned. Jaw101ie (talk) 19:01, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
  • World War III (section) - The premise of the section Difficulty in determining a "World War" is relevant to the page, but the arguments are confused, and it drifts off the point. Deciding what is meant by "World War" is a pre-requisite to determining what (if any) events will be labelled as "World War III". Perhaps this section should just raise the question and refer to World War, which covers the ground more coherently. Swiveler (talk) 06:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Jesse Jackson, Jr. The article is a bit of a mess -- some mis-spelled items, many POV statements, etc. Pyronite (talk) 22:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March

  • Delta Upsilon - Needs to be completely revised. Contians huge lists of members that need to be prosified (in the style used in Alpha Phi Alpha. See the talk page for suggestions for cleanup. --Lendorien (talk) 15:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Chain Reaction (film) - This article is not even fully completed. If someone who has seen the movie could clean it up. As it stands the article lacks sources or even a complete plot summary. --Black Rabite (talk) 10:13 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Forest_School,_Horsham - A complete mess. Poorly formatted. Has a broken infobox, needs rewrite and wikifying. --Lendorien (talk) 14:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Aureal Semiconductor - Article has a lot of messy external links. Needs copy editing + sourcing. Structure could use a cleanup. Tagged since 2006. Probably an easy fixer upper. --Lendorien (talk) 15:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Anna-Maria Ravnopolska-Dean - Major rewrite candidate, reads like it is a resume for the artist. --ScaldingHotSoup (talk) 18:53, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February

[edit] February 15-29

  • Rights of Man - This article is extremely cluttered, needs better segways from section to section, some rewriting and possibly expert attention. Also lacks any sources. --Lendorien (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Pancharatna Kritis - Needs to be rewritten in a more encyclopedic style, wikifying, copy editing, and a lot of work. Contains all of the lyrics of the piece. These need to be removed or moved to wikisource. POV issues as well. No sourcing and orphaned. Desperately in need of attention. I've started work on it, but help needed. --Lendorien (talk) 00:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Chinatown patterns in North America - Completely unsourced, smacks of OR. --Lendorien (talk) 23:58, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Identity (social science) - large portions are unwikified. May contain copyvio. No intext refs, confusing. --Lendorien (talk) 23:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Choctaw is in need of a "second opinion" in regards to grammar, tone, and logical unity. Any help would be appreciated. Rob (talk) 15:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  • George Seton, 5th Earl of Winton is in dire need of help from someone who is familiar with British history. Travellingcari (talk) 16:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Buddhism needs, first of all, reorganizing into a coherent structure. User:Gimme_danger & I tried a while back, but people kept simply reverting & ignored repeated requests to suggest their own arrangement. I hope people can come in & knock their heads together. Once there's a proper structure I can start seriously trying to address the imbalance in the article. Peter jackson (talk) 16:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  • List of current DC Comics publications needs updating. Cubzrule (talk) 09:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)\
  • Ben Macpherson needs cleaning up and a check of sources a lot if incorrect information

[edit] February 1-15, 2008

  • I did a little grammer checking at the start of it, but since I havent the show, someone who has may want to look at its plot {*TEE DUB*} (talk) 18:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I did a little plot work too, but I only saw up to that part.-Sakuraluver(talk)
  • Dragan Radulović, see the talk page, I've identified some sources but language is an issue. Not sure which language of the former Yugoslavia it is, however. Travellingcari (talk) 15:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC) for real!!!!!!!!!!!

[edit] January 2008

  • Simile : too big to be a stub but didn't contain enough information to be a valid encyclopedia article.
  • Paul Tillich - maximally baffling heavy theology that may be OR. Needs stiff editing to make this accessible to the lay reader. 86.145.94.229 (talk) 04:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Transcendental argument for the non-existence of God "Criticisms" section reads like a colloquial forum.
  • Equivalence principle has a section "The equivalence principle and the nature of mass" that needs to be looked at by an expert. There are no citations, the English is poor, and it's lacking in any technical information needed to explain and justify the theory that it's talking about. I'd do it myself, but I've never heard of this theory before and so have no idea where to begin. Dbutler1986 (talk) 10:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • SGML -- This article mainly describes highly specialized aspects of its associated subject. I'm contributing with the article but I would like some help. Rjgodoy (talk) 19:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
  • John Sherman Cooper Needs some work w/ style. See talk page. --Haakonsson (talk) 23:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Aang Article has serious MoS problems that have to do with writing about fiction. In addition, recent changes have cluttered the article. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 02:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Normal number - "Agafonov showed an early connection between finite-state machines and normal sequences: every subsequence selected from a normal sequence by a regular language is also normal. In other words, if one runs a finite-state machine on a normal sequence, where the finite-state machine outputs the digit it just read whenever it enters an accepting state, then the sequence it outputs will be normal." See the talk page for why I believe the statement is false as it stands; could somebody check the reference given ("Agafonov 1968") for what it actually says? - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Template:European Union Treaty Scenario is broken (at least in Mozilla Firefox); it places the images beyond the right edge of the screen (and as a result you have to scroll the article to the right to see them). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 2007

[edit] December 2007

  • Statistical survey - This page is written like class notes.
  • Mary Anderson (stage actress) - A large part of this article is taken word for word from a single source. Although the source is cited, this section should be summarized instead, especially since it is not set off in quotes and is in first person. CClio333 04:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

  • Links through Special:Linksearch/translate.google.com should probably be replaced with direct links. Language icons should be added after the links instead. Sample change: [1] -- User:Docu
  • OvBB Article needs to reflect the recent domain ownership change. It no longer is under Jonathan Freeman's ownership. (1and1 now owns it.) --Iyeru42 (talk) 12:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
    • Image Caption needs the Project forums link removed, unless you wish to change it to one of the demos. --Iyeru42 (talk) 17:04, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Falling of Blossoms is completely in Engrish. Needs proper grammar, and all that. Rogutaan (talk) 01:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance isn't that bad, but still could sound more professional. Marlith T/C 03:38, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Royal Military College of Canada needs cleanup. It used to be a good one but like any University or school article, every student adds it own little piece. It is now hard to read and confusing (i.e. languages, traditions, alumni) and there are a lot of irrelevant chapters (i.e. diversity, collectibles, ethics). Please Help!
  • Magnetosphere particle motion - Article has a discursive conversational physics textbook style, not an encyclopedia article style. It also lacks a proper time and place in order to intro to lead intot he article in a way a layman can understand. --Lendorien 19:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Businesses and organizations in Second Life - The page seems to have become a target for Second Life-related organizations to promote themselves. I have declined to speedily delete the page, as I believe it is salvageable; but it needs a severe pruning. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

[edit] September 2007

  • History of baseball in the United States - Section on Negro Leagues contains very few facts and doesn't read like an encyclopedia entry at all. Really the whole article needs a major overhaul, almost no references.--Youjane1 14:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Nomad - Article needs attention to check accuracy and possibly expand to provide more accurate definition. Also needs sources. --Lendorien 14:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Sukyo Mahikari - Religious article needs thorough cleanup to make encyclopedic. Needs wikification and copy editing for tone and pov issues. Significant sections unsourced. --Lendorien 14:31, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Arguments for and against drug prohibition - reads like a debate, some arguments are very weak e.g. Needs to be gone over for NPOV. Also contains serious sourcing issues. The article uses three different methods of sourcing. Needs to be converted to footnote intext references for entirety of article. Sections may need to be merged or reorganized. A very messy article. --Lendorien 19:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Assiti Shards series - This article has serious neutrality and OR issues. It needs to be deeply cut, perhaps even a deep revert. Completely lacks sources and has a fancruft tone. --Lendorien 19:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Lean Construction Worded like an advertisement. Deals with a specific construction technique by a limited group of firms. Promotes its superiority. Uses extensive external linking directly to for-profit organizations. 4.230.162.237 02:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Clinical_depression#Hypomania Urgent attention of an expert needed ! I (doctor) consider it factually wrong. Anxiety and panic are mostly not part of hypomania. Hypomania belongs to bipolar disorder not unipolar depression. And more and more. Chaotic written too.--jmak 08:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Hidden Mickey, This is quite possibly the worst article I ever read. It is filled with trivia, unrefernced things,indeed, but almost half asmush as the other one errors and a informal style. Marlith T/C 16:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Moisture absorber - Pooly written (informal style ...), unreferenced. - Mike Rosoft 10:54, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Translation - Has some readability issues. Also seems to be the subject of an editing skirmish between people who are in the field. The result is an article that reads like a textbook and is not very accessible to the non-expert. Man It's So Loud In Here 16:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

[edit] 11-31 August, 2007

  • Bezant Confusing and internal contradictions.
  • Irish Property Bubble - Terribly formatted and very poor writing and content.Referencing could be fixed up as well. Olockers 10:30, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Radu Duda, Prince of Hohenzollern-Veringen - Allegations of heavily POV and non-nuetrality. May need copy editing for tone and research to provide better balance. Subject of an edit war. Needs to be reviewed. Please see talk page for more details. --Lendorien 18:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Gelou - a bit more context needed. Sources lacking. --Lendorien 14:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Banasthali Vidyapith - Marked as an article which reads like an advertisement. It's based (with apparent permission) off the school's promotional brochure. Needs tone editing, wikification, cropping and possible expansion to include info usually found in university articles. --Lendorien 14:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Big Brother Australia series 3 - Needs tone checking and sourcing. --Lendorien 14:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Lalitaditya Muktapida - Article is not entirely thematically coherent at the moment. It needs to be reviewed by someone with a background in the subject to straighten things out. --Lendorien 14:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Alan Ladd - his filmography is completely unorganised. Reginmund 18:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Turned filmography into a list, titles still needs to wikified and the list needs to be pruned from non-notable entries as it is pretty long.--Sus scrofa 00:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Ferry Corsten - this is a featured-article calibre dj, but his page seems like it was made either by n00bs or his label. discography is a complete disaster and it lacks focus and background. DJRaveN4x 01:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Last Words - The article needs to be put into proper sections and some general clean up may also be needed. --Credema 17:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Book 3 (Inheritance trilogy) may need to be updated. I had heard that a release date had been released for the third book. I believe it was set for early March, 2008, unless I heard false information.
  • Campus SuperStar is too long. Too many information thrown in on the article which are not required. Please post discussion on talk page before any major cleanup is done.Cocoma 22:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Project SuperStar is too long. Too many information thrown in on the article which are not required. Cocoma 22:32, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 1-10 August, 2007

  • 2 Wheels of Enterprise needs a lot of work. It lacks wikilinking; the section titles do not conform to general practice; the sections are too brief. I don't have time to tackle it, but hopefully somebody can get it into shape. --Moonriddengirl 13:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq grammar, repeated sentences, sections read like it was written by some teenager unfamiliar with the language. As the general's place in Pakistani history is important, I would like someone with academic knowledge to review, since the article has changed since the last time I read it. Mac
  • This looks ok now, I have done a little editing and removed some of the bias.--Seth J. Frantzman 13:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Abduction phenomenon is a godawful mess; see Talk:Abduction phenomenon#Numerous massive problems Eleland 04:27, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Jealousy is based upon an inaccurate/limited definition of the word "jealousy." Does not cover any of the other meanings of the word beyond that in a romantic context. Includes poorly organized, non-encylopaedic content. Entire 3rd paragraph is such high-level summary that it reads like a elementary school project - was worse than useless, far below the quality I've come to expect from Wikipedia. Punctuation is poor -I'm sure I could go on, but overall, I felt this was a very disappointing article.
  • Feminism and the Oedipus complex - Messy stylistically; the section on Deutsch reads like it was automatically translated or translated badly, & other sections are haphazard & unclear. All sections need more detail and a generally more thorough, professional treatment to be useful. PoetrixViridis 04:07, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Emmitt Smith - completely lacking in important career milestones (such as how the Cowboys acquired him), as well as lacking all but the most basic sense of a historic overview (one game is given its own section, the rest of his career is virtually ignored). --Badger Drink 19:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Uyghur people - Sloppily written, with poor grammar and illogical constructions; some sections are written in a juvenile tone; many unsupported statements; general pov Bacrito 15:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Big Brother (UK) - Article reads like a fan site. Poor grammar, no sources. Just plain low-standards. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 18:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Had a go at this but it's such a huge subject to cover on one page... FeeelixTalk!! 12:13, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
  • I had a try at going through bits of the grammar and giving some bits references but it really needs a total rewrite! Groovychick3291 20:18, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Digital Entertainment Network - Article needs to be broken down, it is currently just a block o text. Grammar needs to be improved. Basically, the whole article needs improvement. --Credema 03:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

[edit] 21-31 July 29, 2007

  • Spa bath - article could benefit from some copy editing (grammar, style, further wikification) --Sietse 16:43, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Deathbowl '98 - Written so badly that it's nearly incoherent; completely unreferenced
  • List of colleges and universities in South Carolina - Alot of wrong information. some public colleges listed as private. Needs cleanup
  • Haifa - English could be improved, transportation section is too detailed - maybe deserves its own article, academic institution could be better ... etc. --Lendorien 21:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Amedeo Guillet needs cleanup by someone familiar with Italian military history. Some text editing, organization and sources needed. --Lendorien 21:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Perpetua: An article about an early Christian martyr that mostly just needs some improvements in readability. Sources also needed. --Lendorien 21:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Pallava: Organization is poor. English is muddled. There seems to be some original research mixed in there, although that might just be an artifact of poor composition. Probably needs a solid fact-check. Justin Bacon 15:57, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Promotional model NeedsSome text editing, wikifying + sources. --Lendorien 21:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Hollard Group - Has weird links to non-existent article, POV- seems to be a promo taken from the company literature. Frankie816 14:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Center for Talented Youth - This is terribly written, it is full of typos and has more fandom than information. It seems like someone wrote the article who did not know how to write, because of that there are no links and bad HTML. Marlith 03:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Direct-to-video - Needs copyediting and sources --Lendorien 13:26, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Brian Keenan (musician) Needs cats, some research and sources. --Lendorien 13:26, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Frame of reference - very long paragraphs, particularly in the lead. Needs fact checking and sources + probably expert attention. --Lendorien 13:26, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Nursing Informatics - needs copy editing, sources and probably expert attention. --Lendorien 13:26, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Kshatriya - needs extensive editing for grammar, to remove redundancy, and generally to make it encyclopedic. -- Whateley23 20:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Cave diving - Needs to be completely re-organised. Too much of some info, others are lacking. Lacks proper headings. History section is particularly scrappy (ricjl)

[edit] 11-20 July, 2007

  • Tejano music - Needs repair of many links, and several paragraphs are opinionated talk-page like material. --Whoistheroach 14:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Talking to Dragons - Abnormally massive paragraph with potentially useless information.
  • Steven Pienaar - Has been playground for vandals. Somebody with knowledge of subject may be needed to verify current version, which needs work even if completely accurate. Moonriddengirl 13:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • phantom voltage - Good introduction to this particular term, and is written adequately; however, formatting, citations, and organization need work to be more wiki-ish. Lots of possibly wikify-able terms, aren't. 65.112.197.16 21:23, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Tucker Max - This article has many grammatical errors and is poorly written. The article seems to be biased and makes claims that contradict the sources. 21:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Bassmasters Classic - Lack of third-party sources. Rjgodoy 08:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Nexus:_The_Kingdom_of_the_Winds - This article is poorly organized, badly written, and has a LOT of unnecessary material...lneely42
  • Deleted a LOT of material from this page following the Wikipedia Video Game Article guideline. Also spent some time rewriting several portions of the article correcting grammar, spelling, and poor writing. Some portions I have decided to leave alone for the time being, especially the Controversy section... I think it could be left, but rewritten to be neutral, as the controversy is an integral part of the game... lneely42 06:18, 14 July 2007 (CST)
  • Sardar Amir Azam - De-PoV& wikify. Half of article is unsourced. --Lendorien 18:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • John Tunnard - apart from needing wikifying, extremely subjective account that looks like original research. Needs sources and rewrite to cull out tone issues that make it read like a college textbook discussion. --Lendorien 18:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Stingless bee - Needs sources. --Lendorien 18:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Hip hop & Hip hop music - Both appear to replicate the content of each other. Hip hop music has two styles of referencing, includes a list of sources, and a limited number of Harvard refs. The article is full of opinion, not neutral and very long. Confused re-directs/merger requests. Escaper2007 11:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Vasileios Spanoulis - The formatting of this article is very sloppy and the layout makes for a very confusing read, but it has potential given the amount of quality information about this international NBA player compared to many others. MichaelProcton 04:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Hanover Shoe Farms has a cleanup tag on it but I cannot find the reason why on this page. I made recent edits to it to clean it up but I'm not sure if I fixed the problem. COuld somebody give me a hand? I'm new to wikipedia. Barn Cat 18:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
I will definitely try to help, but most of the help I can offer is to clean up the language. It currently sounds very stilted. Sean Montgomery 14:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Mitotic inhibitor - Recently I have created and expanded the stub 'mitotic inhibitor'. This article is of great importance to cancer treatment and research, but I am very inexperienced in writing for wikipedia and therefore I believe the article needs extensive rewrite, seeing as it does not meet the quality of other wikipedia pages I have seen. I would be grateful if soeone were to help me format the page and expound upon the subject. Dancanm 14:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Kentucky-Louisville rivalry - Alot of grammatical errors, along with poor layout and spelling. Kycowboyntv 23:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Quarantine - Based on the 1911 Britanica article, this article is out of date, poorly written (with too much emphasis on the 19th century) and needs sourcing. --Lendorien 15:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 1-10 July, 2007

  • Strawberry Shortcake-Majority of the article is unsourced and probably contains original research and whatever sources are there are questionable. Storm05 16:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Nihonjinron - An article that looks like it's in the middle of major editing but hasn't been edited in almost a month. It has a section named 'Comment to be repositioned' and other stuff that should've been done on the talk page. Haridan 07:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Pseudo.com - Notable internet pioneer firm, however page lacks a lead, a lot of the information is in non-encyclopedic form, and the bulk of the people mentioned are red-links. --Cerejota 03:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keith Olbermann - Poorly organized, headings not parallel. Hobo-nc 03:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Morchella - Fairly well written, but omits several very important facts: one being that eating the true morel raw will cause serious gastrointestinal distress and the other being that it must not be confused with the toxic False morel. juusan 03:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Non-synchronous transmissions - Article needs serious improvements. It repeats information, it has no illustrations to explain the text, and it is written in an unencyclopedic manner. It also promotes the American Trucker Association, & Professional Truck Driver's Association school at the Houston Community College N.E. campus in northeast Houston, TX (USA)! Why? — CZmarlin 02:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Ranger's Apprentice (series) - A large amount of spelling and grammatical errors. Way to many for me to fix on my own. The content at parts can also sound very unprofessional
  • Bob Clampett - very subjective text in the lower sections - e.g. he wrote some of the 'most outrageuous and funniest cartoons'.
  • Focus III - this reads like a review, and is incredibly positively biased.
  • Edith Pringle: Aussie pol activist. Needs sourcing. --Lendorien 16:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Mii (Jungle de Ikou!) - This article is about a cartoon featuring a ten year old girl with large breasts. The writers of this article do not deserve good faith; the depraved tone is hideously unencyclopedic. A gx7 02:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Fay B. Kaigler Children's Book Festival - Seems to me someone just typed it straight from a book or typed it. Considered deletion tag, but I think it's salvageable. Wikified a bit of it and added categories, but it's massive. Hourick 22:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Akatsuki (Naruto) - A former GA article that was demoted due to too much in-universe material and a large amount of trivia. User:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 19:40 (Eastern Standard Time), 3 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Shuriken School - It has little information, has no illustrations, and is written in an unencyclopedic manner. It needs some serious improving. Thomas Yen 16:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Ranger's Apprentice (series) - A large amount of spelling and grammatical errors. Way to many for me to fix on my own. The content at parts can also sound very unprofessional. Scabloo 04:23, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Knights of the Dinner Table - Character bios could possibly be moved to Characters from Knights of the Dinner Table to make room for info about the publication itself. Also needs sourcing. See talk page. --Lendorien 16:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

[edit] 21-30 June, 2007

  • Dead Rising - The characters' section looks like it was just ripped out of a walk through or game guide.
  • Object composition - A new section about Aggregation in COM was included, which may be confusing or unclear for some readers. Rjgodoy 05:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Valley_High_School_(Des_Moines,_Iowa) - Lots of <br> tags, inconsistent formatting. Bassgoonist 19:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Video CD - Large sections contain grammar errors as if parts were machine-translated into English. 67.66.92.222 19:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Lawrence Dimick - This article is clumsily written, with halting grammar. The headings make it unclear whether the section "fictional biography" is missing entirely (other than the heading itself) or made up of subsections that merely relate the plot of Reservoir Dogs. The entire article is written with overly basic sentences; this may seem like an odd complaint, but read the article and you'll see what I mean. Minaker 06:38, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Louis Briffa - Unwikified, possibly copied from somewhere. - Mike Rosoft 10:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Amapola Cabase - reads like a promotional, and contains many runon paragraphs with not much sense of order. Squalk25 16:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Thompson (band) - Doesn't look to be written by native English speaker. Odd grammatical mistakes littered throughout. Also may contain OR and copyright violations. Milton 22:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Children's street culture - From the first sentence to the end section is poorly written, with many off topic and lists too long.GreaterWikiholic 04:05, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Zbigniew Brzezinski - This long article has good content; it needs a serious copyeditor to lift its quality. Lightwiki 23:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC).
  • Abdul Baqi Purani - almost unreadable; possibly translated from Pakistani. David Mestel(Talk) 16:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
  • First-Person Shooter - Most of the article is pretty good, but a few sections need a bit of help. GreaterWikiholic 16:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Kumon method - Promotional - Mike Rosoft 17:33, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Gabe Saporta - Unreferenced claims. - Mike Rosoft 17:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 11-20 June, 2007

  • Chiastic_structure - Needs one or more good examples, attention from an expert. --Biggus Dictus 19:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • HSV SS Group A - Needs more wikifying and cleanup from someone who knows his/her cars. Mvuijlst 17:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Sinitta - terrible, terrible article......needs a lot of help--Paul75 00:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Des'ree - Reads like a press release--Paul75 00:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Civil War (comic book) - The Synopsis section needs cleaning up. It's really long and wordy and disorganized and is just a retelling of it all, and is not encyclopedic. It also needs extensive copyediting. --zandperl 16:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • List of Greek companies - loaded with lots of non-notables that need pruning out. Astrovega 00:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Allan Snyder - reads like an award citation and needs citations. Bakashi10 06:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Kyiv-classic - Contains no references, and appears to have been written by someone involved with the orchestra, but also appears legitimate based upon Google search. -FeralDruid 11:10, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Yoshi's Story is poorly written with an absoulutely terrible section. GreaterWikiholic 04:30, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Monoboard - Article reads like something made up in school.