Sources
Help build the largest human-edited directory on the web.
Submit a site - Become an editor
Wikipedia. Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Are you an expert in this subject? Join the discussion and share your knowledge at Wikipedia.org.
Wikitruth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Wikitruth | |
|---|---|
 |
|
 Logo and main page screenshot |
|
| URL | http://www.wikitruth.info/ |
| Type of site | Wiki, database |
| Registration | currently unavailable |
| Available language(s) | English |
| Owner | Unknown |
| Created by | Unknown |
| Launched | March 20, 2006 |
Wikitruth is a website critical of the online encyclopedia project Wikipedia. It was created on March 20, 2006.
The site argues that there are fundamental problems with the structure of Wikipedia. It highlights the reported actions and statements of prominent Wikimedia Foundation members, such as Jimmy Wales, and probes the concept of vandalism, censorship of articles on Wikipedia, and other aspects of the Wikipedia culture.
Contents |
Wikitruth is run by a group of Wikipedia editors, including several administrators, who have spent hundreds of hours editing Wikipedia pages.[1] Wikipedia creator Jimmy Wales has labeled the site "a hoax", and its creators "almost certainly people who have been banned by Wikipedia".[2] Wikitruth's editors responded that current Wikipedia administrators did indeed contribute to Wikitruth, claiming that several articles could not have been written without someone having administrator status.[3]
Wikitruth runs on the MediaWiki software. However, it uses a feature which prohibits editing by anonymous users, and the site is not open for new account signups. Readers may contact the editors through e-mail.[4]
The first major media attention to Wikitruth was published on April 13, 2006, in an article in The Guardian by Andrew Orlowski, the San Francisco bureau chief for The Register, who has also written articles critical of Wikipedia.[5]
Wikitruth gained wider notice when Slashdot, a technology-related news website, posted an item on April 16, 2006 titled "Censored Wikipedia Articles Appear On Protest Site", which referenced the Guardian piece. The post specifically mentioned the deletion and significant modification by Wales and others of articles on registered Ohio sex offender Brian Peppers, former underage webcam pornographer Justin Berry, and adult-film director Paul Barresi.[6] Due in part to being mentioned in a front-page news item on Slashdot, Wikitruth's servers were overrun with a flood of attention.[7] Later, Wikitruth was mentioned on Metafilter, Digg, and various other news sites as well.[8]
The next day, Orlowski published another article, this time in The Register, titled "Wales and Sanger on Wikipedia". This article echoed several criticisms about Wikipedia from "Skip", whom Orlowski described as a Wikipedia administrator who is a part of Wikitruth. Some of the criticisms leveled by "Skip" in the article include comments about Wikipedia's lack of a CAPTCHA challenge-response test for securing registration or editing and preference for inclusion of certain kinds of articles such as Pokémon.[9]
The website levels several criticisms against Wikipedia, including exposing articles and edits that Wikipedia has censored and other “atrocities” involving administrative feuding.[10] One group of these criticism centers on Wales and WP:OFFICE, a meta page on Wikipedia set up to deal with certain legal and related issues. Wikitruth uses certain deletions carried out by Wales and others under the policy (actions that it rewords as "Office Does It, Shut Up")[11] to argue that Wikipedia content is censored. There is also a page describing Wales on the website, which contains several arguments, including the assertion that Wales rules by fiat and entices other "Wikipedians" to perform actions he wants, such as the insertion of certain website links into articles.[12] Some Wikipedia policies support Wales as the "ultimate authority on any matter."[13]
Another group of criticisms centers on specific Wikipedia processes. For example, Wikitruth criticizes Wikipedia's recent changes patrol, a group of Wikipedia editors who inspect recent changes in Wikipedia articles, calling them "a Junior Woodchuck Club" that prevents legitimate edits to Wikipedia articles.[14] Wikitruth also states that it is easy for Wikipedia editors to comply maliciously, to "game the system" by outwardly following Wikipedia protocol.[15] The only protocol they have explicitly stated is flawed to enable "gaming" is Wikipedia's limit of three reverts to an article per user per 24-hour window[16] and the use of administration in stepping in to resolve complications in such disputes. Other issues that they comment on include the concept of notability, controversy surrounding neutrality in articles, and the use of sockpuppets.
- ^ Julian Dibbell. 2006. "Turf Wars". Village Voice, May 2 issue. [1]
- ^ Gonsalves, Antone (April 17, 2006). Wikipedia Founder Calls Protest Site Wikitruth 'A Hoax'. TechWeb. Retrieved November 13, 2006.
- ^ Jimbo Calls Us A Hoax. Wikitruth. Retrieved on 2006-04-17.
- ^ Wikitruth:Magic Incantation
- ^ Andrew Orlowski. "A thirst for knowledge", The Guardian, 2006-04-13. Retrieved on 2006-04-17.
- ^ Gregory Rider. "Censored Wikipedia Articles Appear On Protest Site", Slashdot, 2006-04-17. Retrieved on 2006-04-17.
- ^ Hammered. Wikitruth. Retrieved on 2006-04-17.
- ^ PeterMcDermott. "Wikitruth, wikidare, wikikiss...", Metafilter, 2006-04-17. Retrieved on 2006-04-17.
- ^ Andrew Orlowski. "Wales and Sanger on Wikipedia", The Register, 2006-04-18. Retrieved on 2008-04-18.
- ^ Steve Smith (July, 2006). When The Wiki Hits The Fan. Computer Power User. Retrieved on 2007-10-27.
- ^ WP:OFFICE. Wikitruth. Retrieved on 2006-04-17.
- ^ Jimbo Wales. Wikitruth. Retrieved on 2006-04-17.
- ^ Foundation Issues. Wikimedia Meta. Retrieved on 2006-10-30.
- ^ RC patrollers. Wikitruth. Retrieved on 2006-04-18.
- ^ Gaming the system. Wikitruth. Retrieved on 2006-04-18.
- ^ Wikipedia:Three-revert rule. Wikipedia. Retrieved on 2007-04-07.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Main articles | Bomis · Nupedia · Wikipedia · Wikimedia Foundation · Wikimania · MediaWiki |
| People | Jimmy Wales · Larry Sanger · Tim Shell · Florence Devouard · Angela Beesley |
| Events and individuals | Blocking of Wikipedia in mainland China · Congressional staffer edits to Wikipedia · Essjay controversy · Seigenthaler controversy · WikiScanner · Chris Benoit controversy · Truth in Numbers: The Wikipedia Story |
| Wikimedia projects | Wikibooks · Wikimedia Commons · Wiktionary · Wikiquote · Wikinews |
| Related projects and forks | Citizendium · Enciclopedia Libre · Interpedia · Veropedia · WikiZnanie · Wikinfo · Wikiweise · Wikia · WikiWikiWeb |