Women in Rome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Roman women had little legal independence, and virtually no political rights except by their status as a Roman citizen woman. Most Roman women mentioned by historians come from elite groups, with very rare exceptions such as a courtesan mentioned in the scandals of the Bacchanalia, and a few maidservants who exposed misdeeds (by elite women) in great families.

Women's individual identities even are often hard for a historian to disentangle as a look at the list below confirms. Due to this background position in the society, women referred by name in the ancient sources are scarce.

Ironically, early Roman society gave much honor (in theory) to their women, possibly as a result of treaties between the Romans and the Sabines and an emphasis on child-bearing. Women had no legal or political rights, but divorce was rare and men were expected to honor women (through their speech, their clothing etc). In practice, women were made legally and financially dependent on their husbands entirely after marriage which was made a holy rite and all but indissoluble.

The first recorded Roman divorce took place in 230 BC, when one Spurius Carvilius Ruga (possibly the former consul Spurius Carvilius Maximus Ruga) divorced his wife on grounds of infertility or sterility.[1]; however, the first Roman divorces probably took place around 604 BC or earlier, according to Valerius Maximus.(see note 1 below).

While divorce was all but impossible, and marriages for elite couples were held sacred, this did grant women certain security for themselves and their children, which was wanting in the days of the Middle to Late Republic.

Contents

Under Roman law, marriages were of three kinds - sacred by the sharing of bread (conferrateo), by purchase (coemptio), and by mutual cohabitation (usus). Patricians always married conferrateo, while plebeians married by the latter two kinds. In the last type of marriage, a woman could absent herself from her husband's home for three successive nights to avoid his establishing legal control over her. Other types of marriage involved legal control (and ownership) of a woman and her dowry and inheritances passing from the father (or the pater familias, his lineal ancestor) to the husband (or his paterfamilias).[citation needed]

Women were always held to be minors in Roman law. A married woman fell under the guardianship of her husband (or his pater familias); a widow or a fatherless girl fell under the guardianship of her nearest male agnate. Under the Twelve Tables, if a man died intestate, his property passed to his nearest male agnate, and if no such agnate lived, to his nearest clansmen. However, by will, until the lex Voconia (169 BC), a man could leave property to his widow and his daughters or his granddaughters.

Most women were given dowries when they married to enable them to marry well and to compensate for their loss of rights in their natal family. However, control of the dowry usually rested with the husband (or his pater familias), although in the Late Republic, many women were able to control their dowries and inheritances on their own.


The place of the matrona (a Roman woman) in the society was taking care of the family and household. She was under the protection of the pater familias (the master of the house), either the father or the husband. She was not entitled to have any public office or to participate in any political activities. Travel, even accompanied, was all but impossible.

In the early to middle years of the Republic, women were forbidden to leave (or discouraged from leaving) the house with their heads unveiled, to attend the games without the consent of their husbands, to speak privately to any slave or freedmen, to drink wine publicly or privately. (If they did, they could be punished or even be divorced).[citation needed]

Women were not allowed to dine with their husbands; they dined alone or with other women or with their children. They attended their husbands and sons while the latter dined, but sat upright, never lying or reclining on couches. In the Late Republic, all these customs changed, although they continued to persist in more conservative families.

Women were expected to take care of the household, to spin wool and weave cloth (of wool or linen), to take care of the children, and to minister to the needs of the men in the family. In wealthier families, slaves took over the actual tasks, but women were still expected to supervise all chores.

Education of women began around 200 BC, possibly in the household of Scipio Africanus Major and his relatives. These more liberal Romans wanted their wives and daughters educated so that their moral fibre would be improved, they themselves would be better companions to their husbands, and most importantly, so that they could better supervise the education and upbringing of their children. One of the reasons that Tiberius Gracchus Major chose to marry the much younger Cornelia was that he wanted an educated wife. Within a century, the education of elite Roman women was the norm. Education meant literacy, presumably numeracy, knowledge of both Greek and Latin, and reading of the classics in both languages, and also history. Girls were educated along with boys in some households, but their lessons tended to differ as they grew older.[citation needed]

Some women (i.e. the Vestal Virgins) were able to gain respect and honor as priestesses. The primary task of the Vestal Virgins was to maintain the sacred fire of Vesta; priestesses' presence was considered necessary in certain rituals. Wealthier women could also gain respect by funding these ceremonies. (See Mary Lefkowitz's article, "A Woman's Place Was in the Temple", Wilson Quarterly, Winter '93).

Roman women kept out of the public sphere until 195 BC when women revolted against proposals to retain laws against luxuries which prevented them from wearing gold or silver or expensive clothing, or from riding in chariots or in expensive litters. These laws had been passed in 215 BC in the aftermath of Cannae, but they were no longer felt necessary. Cato the Censor chided Roman women for speaking out and congregating in public, and for their aggressiveness in what should have been left to their menfolk to decide or represent in public. Nevertheless, the laws were abolished and the women triumphant. (His opposition did not hurt Cato's political career). Much later, Roman women, led by Hortensia, would successfully protest against laws designed to tax Roman women in an early version of "No Taxation Without Representation". In both cases, elite women mingled with women from the lower classes in joint protests.[citation needed]

Other women like Livia Drusilla, (58 BC-AD 29), Augusta (honorific), was the wife of Caesar Augustus and the most powerful woman in the early Roman empire, acting several times as regent and being Augustus' faithful advisor. Several women of the Imperial family, notably Agrippina the Younger, gained political influence as well as public prominence.

Most Roman women known to us were living in the Late Republic or in Imperial Rome, partly because Roman women living in the Early to Middle Republic had little political power, virtually no legal independence (except as Vestal Virgins or in other rare cases), and were absent in official histories. However, many role models, such as Lucretia, Aemilia Paulla, and Cornelia Africana available to Roman women lived in or were born in the Early to Middle Republic.

The list below includes women who were notable for their family connections, or their sons or husbands, or their own actions. In the earlier periods, women came to the attention of (later) historians either as poisoners of their husbands (a very few cases), or as wives, daughters, and mothers of great men such as Scipio Africanus. In later periods, women exercised or tried to exercise political power either through their husbands (as did Fulvia and Livia Drusilla) or political intrigues (as did Clodia and Servilia Caepionis), or directly (as did [[[Agrippina the younger]] and later Roman empresses).

  • Aemilia Paulla (3rd century BC-2nd century BC), wife of Scipio Africanus Major and mother of Cornelia Africana (see below), noted for the unusual freedom given her by her husband, her enjoyment of luxuries, and her influence as role model for elite Roman women after the Second Punic War. Her date of birth, marriage, and death are all unknown (but then so are those for her illustrious husband whose birth and death dates are approximated!).
  • Cornelia Africana (2nd century BC), mother of Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus; virtually deified by Roman women as a model of feminine virtues and Stoicism, but never officially deified. The first Roman woman, whose approximate birth year and whose year of death is known, thanks to a law she had passed to allow her granddaughter to inherit.
  • Licinia, the name of the women of the gens Licinius. Notable members include
    • Licinia, a woman killed by her relatives in 142 BC for murdering her husband;
  • Mucia, the name of the women of the gens Mucius.
    • Licia, a woman killed by her relatives in 142 BC for murdering her husband. Both Licinia and Mucia appealed for a trial, and before they could come to trial, they were tried by their relatives and executed. This was a major scandal in the censorship of Lucius Mummius Achaius and Scipio Aemilianus.
  • Pomponia (mother of Scipio) (2nd century BC), daughter, niece, wife, and mother of consuls; born a plebeian noblewoman but married to a patrician. Mother of Scipio Africanus Major and Scipio Asiaticus. She was reportedly very religious and devout, but nothing else is known of her including the year of her marriage or death.
  • Publilia (1st century BC), the name of a woman of the gens Publilius. She was killed in 154 BC for poisoning her husband, the consul of the preceding year.



1. Timing the first Roman divorce
Dionysius of Halicarnassus in Antiquitates Romanae, 2.25 (written ca. 7 B.C.E.) wrote that "in the one hundred and thirty-seventh Olympiad, in the consulship of Marcus Pomponius [Matho] and Gaius Papirius [Maso, i.e. in 231-230 BC], Spurius Carvilius, a man of distinction, was the first to divorce his wife." The cause was her barrenness; however, this divorce did not make him popular among the people. It is ironic that this would be the first divorce (as Dionysus states, based on hearsay), since the Twelve Tables (450 BC) promulgated over two hundred years earlier did make provision for divorce. According to Dionysus, Spurius Carvilius was a man of distinction; other sources (without specific citations) claim that he was a freedman (i.e. a former slave).[3]. The Wikipedia entry on Spurius Carvilius suggests that the date given for this divorce is wrong; that the divorce probably took place well before the Twelve Tables legalized divorce, perhaps as early as 600 BC.

A Roman consul by the name of Spurius Carvilius Maximus Ruga served with Manius Pomponius Matho in 233 BC; it is possible that the historian Dionysius of Halicarnassus (writing more than 200 years later from hearsay accounts) confused the freedman Spurius Carvilius (living circa 600 BC?) with this man living in 233 BC.

Aulus Gellius in the Noctes Atticae (ca. 150 C.E.), 4.3.1 writes that "Spurius Carvilius, who was surnamed Ruga, a man of rank" [thus possibly the man who was consul] divorced his wife for barrenness in the "consulship of Marcus Atilius and Publius Valerius" (i.e. in the year 227 BC when Publius Valerius L.f. Flaccus and Marcus Atilius M.f. Regulus were consuls. However, in other accounts, Gellius varies the story in dating and is less certain of his sources. In all sources however, it is agreed that Spurius Carvilius divorced his wife for barrenness in the first recorded Roman divorce.[4] Valerius Maximus differs saying that one L. Annius divorced his wife (without consulting his friends) and was removed from the Senate by the censors in 307 BC. A modern writer suggest that divorces took place earlier, and were not properly regulated; hence the need to include a law on divorce in the Twelve Tables.[5]

Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.